ArticleJune 25th, 2013
Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 4 of the Voting Rights ActU.S.
The Supreme Court issued a ruling today that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is no longer constitutional, overriding objections from civil rights proponents who say that it is one of the most important pieces of legislation from the civil rights era.
Section 4 required nine southern states to gain approval of the Department of Justice before making any changes to voting laws in their state. The states were determined based on polls taken in the 1960s to find what areas had low minority-voter turnout.
Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision, stated, “Section 4’s formula is unconstitutional in light of current conditions.”
Court tells Congress to write a new formula
“Our decision in no way affects the permanent, nationwide ban on racial discrimination in voting found in [Section] 2. We issue no holding on [Section] 5 itself, only on the coverage formula. Congress may draft another formula based on current conditions,” he wrote, arguing that Section4 was “based on decades-old data and eradicated practices.”
However, most analysts say the issue is too controversial for the current Congress to reach agreement on a formula for where federal oversight is still required.
Southern states felt discriminated against
Many southern states felt that the act was discriminatory because it imposed rules in some states and not others. Many of those cities and towns now have equal voter turnout between minorities and whites.
The court was also expected to rule on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which allows the Justice Department to preview any changes to voting laws in areas with a history of racial discrimination. However, the court did not make a decision on Section 5, allowing it to stand.
Voter ID laws seen as new form of discrimination
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 also prohibited states from creating any voter qualifications that could make an otherwise eligible citizen unable to vote based on race. But nearly 50 years after the act was put into place, many southern states feel that is no longer needed.
While times have changed, many civil rights activists point to new Voter ID laws as evidence that they are still fighting against discriminatory voting laws. In addition, many voters in large urban areas waited hours to vote, and counties were ordered to stay open into the late hours of the 2012 election.
To see how some people reacted to the news around the country, check out these tweets on today’s decision:
Sec 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. 5-4. Per CJ Roberts.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 25, 2013
— Donna Brazile (@donnabrazile) June 25, 2013
POWER TO THE STATES http://t.co/t4eAzYogK8
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 25, 2013
— Compiled by Carrie Waltemeyer for NewsHour Extra
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of RSS content 3
Connection Challenge: Students leave social comfort zones to build stronger, safer communities
Inspired by Parkland students, schools across the U.S. participated in the Connection Challenge as a way to step out of their comfort zones and connect with other young people at school who they wouldn’t normally interact with. Continue readingactivismadvisoryApril 20th WalkoutELAempathyFlorida shootingGovernment & Civicsgun violenceGunshomeroomNational School Walkoutparklandschool communityschool shootingssnapchatSocial IssuesSocial StudiesSRLstudent protestsstudent reporting labswalkout
Ten classroom resources for teaching students about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
April 4, 2018, marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of civil rights leader Dr.…Civil Rights MovementdiscriminationGovernment & CivicsI Have A Dreamlesson planMarch on WashingtonMartin Luther King Jr.racismSocial IssuesSocial Studies
Lesson plan: Brown v. Board of Education and the story of Prince Edward County Schools
Use this lesson plan to learn more about the life of Linda Brown and the impact of the Brown v. Board of Education case in the U.S. today. Continue readingBrown v. Board of Educationcivil rightsdesegregationeducationGovernment & CivicshistoryLinda BrownNAACPPlessy v. FergusonPrince Edward CountyracismsegregationSocial IssuesSocial StudiesSRLstudent proteststudent reporting labsSupreme Court
March For Our Lives: Ways to debrief with students this week
While other events make the news headlines, the March For Our Lives is likely still playing a key part in your students’ lives, even those who may not have attended any events over the weekend. Use these videos and student voice pieces to debrief on the March and discuss next steps forward. Continue readingcivil disobedienceFlorida shootingGovernment & Civicsgun controlgun policygun reformgun violenceMarch for Our LivesMedia LiteracyNational Rifle AssociationNational Walkout DayNewsHour WeekendNRAparklandschool shootingsSecond AmendmentSocial IssuesSocial Studiesstudent proteststudent walkoutsvotingwalkout
‘We were there. We were making history.’ Students reflect on the March For Our Lives
From registering voters to student reporting, from the role of race to the underrepresentation of trans youth voices, five students share their reflections on the March For Our Lives. Continue reading#NeverAgainCongressDonald TrumpGovernment & Civicsgun controlgun violenceLGBTQMarch for Our LivesMarjory Stoneman Douglas High SchoolparklandPeople of Colorraceschool shootingsSocial IssuesSocial Studiesstudent protestStudent Voicetrans youthtransgendervoting