Daily VideoAugust 14, 2013
Judge Rules New York’s “Stop and Frisk” Unfairly Targets Minorities
Recently, a federal judge declared that New York City’s “Stop and Frisk” policy was unconstitutional because it unfairly targets minority men. When making her decision, Judge Shira Scheindlin cited the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
The stop and frisk program allows New York Police Department officers to stop pedestrians they suspect of wrongdoing, question them and frisk them for weapons or contraband. While only a small percentage of stops result in arrests or weapons confiscations, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it is a vital part of keeping the city safe.
“Our crime strategies and tools, including stop, question, frisk, have made New York City the safest big city in America,” he said. “In fact, murders are 50 percent below the level they were 12 years ago, when we came into office, something no one thought possible back then. Stop, question, frisk, which the Supreme Court of the United States has found to be constitutional, is an important part of that record of success.”
However, the young men affected most by the policy say it is damaging the community. David Ourlicht, who says he has been stopped so many times he can’t remember the number, said, “I think that that creates distrust within the community, because I think these communities, like, yes, we all want safe things, but I also don’t want my son or my child or my uncle or my niece or my nephew or anybody in my — or family and friends to have to be abused.”
“I have pretty much lost track of how many times I have been stopped. It’s sort of like rites of passage for a lot of black and brown boys in different neighborhoods around the city,” – Nicholas Peart.
Warm up questions
1. What is the “Stop, question, and frisk” policy? How does it work? Do you have it in your state?
2. What is the 4th Amendment? Why is it important?
3. Do you think that people of color are unfairly targeted by police?
1. What are the positive effects of this policy? What are some of the negative effects?
2. Could there be other factors- besides the “Stop, question, and frisk” policy- that have led to a decrease in the crime rate in New York and other cities?
3. Do you think the Judge’s decision to challenge the policy was right or wrong? Explain and defend your answer.
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
Use this PBS NewsHour lesson plan to discuss President Trump’s comments that football players should be fired if they kneel during the national anthem. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceSocial StudiesU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Thousands of evacuees sought refuge in Houston’s convention center during Hurricane Harvey, but their pets were not allowed in with them. New emergency service groups and animal shelters in Houston are taking a step to include animals and pets in disaster planning. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceSocial StudiesU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Hillary Clinton, the former senator, secretary of state, first lady and presidential candidate published her memoir, “What Happened,” last week about the 2016 presidential election in which she lost to Donald Trump. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceSocial StudiesU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Seven million Floridians remain without power along with 1.5 million people in Georgia and millions more in the Caribbean after Hurricane Irma struck those areas over the last week. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceSocial StudiesU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Monday marks the 16th anniversary of the attacks on September 11th. Discuss with your students how the U.S. has changed over the last 16 years as a result of 9/11. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceSocial StudiesU.S.UncategorizedWorld