Daily VideoJune 23, 2015
Military conducted race-based experiments during WWII
The U.S. tested the effects of highly toxic mustard gas on troops in nonconsensual, race-based experiments during World War II, according to a new NPR investigation.
Mustard gas is a toxic agent that causes severe damage to skin and mucous membranes; it has been linked to long-term health issues like respiratory infections, burns, cancer and blindness. The experiments involved 60,000 men and at least nine of those experiments specifically tested men of color to see if their skin would react differently to the gas.
The U.S. had already admitted to the experiments, but not that some of them had been based on race. Researchers thought at the time that men of color would be more resistant to the gas, according to Susan Smith, a professor at the University of Alberta, Canada.
“The expectation was that white soldiers would have one kind of response, but African-Americans might be more resistant, Japanese Americans as well, and Puerto Ricans too, that there would be racial differences they could identify,” Smith said.
The U.S. conducted the experiments anticipating the use of chemicals in WWII, Smith said. Historical records list all participants as “volunteers,” but that is not necessarily accurate. Some men were unaware of the nature of the experiment and were simply ordered to participate, Caitlin Dickerson, who led the investigation, said.
The Nuremberg Code, a set of ethical guidelines for human research, was created in 1947 shortly after WWII ended. It states that researchers must gain informed consent from participants that are aware of the potential effects of research. Research should avoid “unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.”
Today, the Department of Defense does not conduct chemical experiments on humans, a spokesperson told NPR.
Warm up questions
- What is mustard gas?
- What does the phrase “chemical war” mean?
Critical thinking questions
- Why did scientists want to test the effects of mustard gas?
- What should the U.S. government and Veterans Administration do to compensate the veterans who participated in these experiments?
- Would you participate in medical tests if there was a chance it could adversely affect you, but help other people? What kind of information would help you make that decision?
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
There is a growing movement among young conservatives, including evangelical Christians, who support environmental regulations. They say it’s important to act as faithful stewards of the earth. One group, the Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, has grown to 10,000 members in the past five years. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceU.S.UncategorizedWorld
School districts around the country are debating whether or not to require seat belts on school buses. Requiring seat belts comes at a high cost for school districts already struggling with tight budgets. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Since the firing of FBI Director James Comey earlier this week, the White House has contradicted itself several times as to the reasoning behind President Donald Trump’s decision. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceU.S.UncategorizedWorld
In a surprising move, President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday after receiving recommendations from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceU.S.UncategorizedWorld
Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper addressed a Senate hearing on Monday over the investigation into the Trump administration’s relationship with Russia and the warnings the White House received about Gen. Michael Flynn. Continue readingArts & CultureEconomicsHealthScienceU.S.UncategorizedWorld