Daily VideoNovember 22, 2013
Senate Democrats Invoke “Nuclear Option” for Judicial Nominees
Democrats in the Senate have invoked the so-called “nuclear option,” allowing them to confirm the president’s nominations for judgeships with a simple majority vote, overturning decades of Senate precedent that required 60 votes to overcome a filibuster on nominees. A filibuster is a prolonged speech that can continue until “three-fifths” of the senators vote to end it. It is a rule that the party in the minority can use to block laws or votes supported by only a “simply majority” of 51 votes.
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid blamed the action on Republicans, who he said have abused the confirmation process.
“The American people are fed up with this kind of obstruction and gridlock. In the history of our country, some 230-plus years, there have been 168 filibusters of executive and judicial nominations. Half of them have occurred during the Obama administration,” he said.
The rule change passed by a vote of 52 to 48, with all Republican senators and three Democrats opposed.
“This was nothing more than a power grab in order to try to advance the Obama administration’s regulatory agenda, and they just broke the Senate rules in order to exercise the power grab,” said Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
President Obama praised the vote, saying that both parties have misused filibusters, but that Republicans have been using them in an especially reckless and relentless way.
“Today’s pattern of obstruction, it just isn’t normal. It’s not what our founders envisioned,” he said. “A deliberate and determined effort to obstruct everything, no matter what the merits, just to refight the results of the election is not normal, and for the sake of future generations, we can’t let it become normal.”
Warm up questions
- How many senators are there in the U.S. Senate?
- Why is 51 an important number in the Senate? Why is 60 an important number?
- What is a filibuster?
- Why does the Senate need to confirm the people that the president nominates to be judges?
- Do you agree with the Senate’s vote to change the rules to make it easier to confirm presidential appointments? Why or why not?
- Why do you think Republicans have filibustered so many of the president’s nominees?
- Republicans argue that the filibuster rules are necessary to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. What does that mean? Do you think it is necessary?
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
Over three million people have commented online to the Federal Communications Commission on the net neutrality debate, the results of which could have drastic effects on how we use the Internet. Continue reading
Scotland voted against splitting from the United Kingdom in a historic referendum that could have granted the country independence. Continue reading
Scientists are developing a new breed of rice that could help improve public health in the Philippines, but some say it will harm the environment. Continue reading
President Obama announced the U.S. will scale its efforts to combat the Ebola virus in West Africa, which has spread exponentially throughout the region in recent months. Continue reading
“I’m hopeful that the dreams which I have now to see every child going to school, to see equal rights for women, I think, soon…I will see those dreams becoming a reality.” Continue reading