Online NewsHour Extra

Top Story


Special report: Iraq

Iraq Under Pressure Iraq asks to meet with the U.N. regarding weapons inspections. (3/7/02)

Perennial Problem
A look at the U.S. policy towards Iraq, the problem that won't go away. (2/23/01)

Outside Links:
Extra is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites.

U.S. State Department Iraq Page

United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM)

United Nations Office of the Iraq Programme

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Iraq's Nuclear Resources

Baghdad News

Debating the News: Iraq
August 7, 2002

Welcome to the first in a series of "Debating The News" where NewsHour Extra presents two main sides to an important issue and lets you make up your own mind. Let us know your opinion of this feature and of the topic.

The issue: In his State of the Union address in January 2002, President Bush called Iraq part of the world's "Axis of Evil" countries and has suggested that leader Saddam Hussein should be removed.

Iraq and its leader have had a difficult relationship with the United States ever since the Persian Gulf war in 1990-1991, when the U.S. sent thousands of military troops to the President Bush SpeakingMiddle East to stop an Iraqi invasion of the neighboring country of Kuwait.

Since then, Hussein has been accused of many different crimes including supporting terrorist organizations, developing weapons of mass destruction like nuclear bombs, and murdering its own people with poison gas.

Background: Congress holds hearings about a potential attack on Iraq.

The question: Does the U.S. have the right to go into a country and remove its government? Should the U.S. go to war with Iraq now or wait until Hussein does something against the U.S. directly?

Point of View One: The U.S. should remove Hussein soon.

People supporting the removal of Hussein believe attacking him first, called a "pre-emptive" strike, is the only way to ensure that he does not attack his own people, a neighboring country, or even the United States.

Read statements from government officials and analysts arguing that military action is important and necessary.

Point of View Two: The U.S. should consider other options before launching military action.

Saddam HusseinPeople opposed to toppling Hussein point to a lack of concrete evidence of many things he is accused of doing.

Since Hussein has refused to let United Nations weapons inspectors inside his country since 1998, exactly what kind of weapons or how many weapons are stored is unknown.

No public direct link has been drawn between Hussein and any terrorist activities in the last nine years.

Read statements from government officials and analysts arguing that there are other things the U.S. should consider first.

Speak Out! Now that you've read both sides of the argument, state your opinion in a 300-word essay and send it to us. We'll publish the best entries on the site.

 

 

-- By Samara Aberman, NewsHour Extra

 
Online NewsHour Extra NewsBank In the News The Buzz Top Story