Online NewsHour Extra NEWSHOUR EXTRA A NewsHour with Jim Lehrer special for students Search For Teachers Daily Buzz Top Story

Top Story

 



NewsHour Extra:

Middle East: A Daring Time To Be Young (10/25/00)

Anything But Normal: Trade Relations Between the U.S. and China (5/25/00)

Clinton Goes To India (3/29/00)

The G-8 Economic Summit in Japan
(7/19/00)

Streaming Video:

Click here to Play

NewsHour segment on international issues facing President-elect Bush

Click here to Play

NewsHour segment on President-elect Bush's National Security Team


Outside Links:
Extra is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites.

Central Intelligence Agency

Global Trends 2015

The President's Cabinet

 

 

Creating the Future Through Foreign Policy
(January 10, 2001)

When President-elect Bush settles into the Oval Office, one of the first things he'll probably have to deal with is the messy situation in the Middle East. It's just one of the trouble spots around the world that the United States is involved in. There's also Kosovo, Northern Ireland, and North Korea, just to name a few.

To help plan his foreign affairs strategy, the new president will turn to some of his most trusted advisors, some of whom worked for Bush's father when he was president from 1988-1992. But the Bush team is facing a world that has changed a lot in those eight years.

The U.S. vs. the USSR

The most dramatic change in recent world history has been the collapse of the Soviet Union, which for decades was America's number one enemy.

During the 1950's and 60s, most of the world seemed to be divided into two teams, with the U.S. and Western Europe on one side, and the Soviets, Eastern Europe and China on the other. In exchange for their allegiance, smaller countries received military protection and economic support from one of the "superpowers."

The U.S. team formed a military alliance known as NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). The Soviets made a similar agreement with their allies, known as The Warsaw Pact. For decades, these two teams, led by the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., faced off in what became known as the Cold War. Each side spied on the other, and tried to beat them in creating new weapons and spying equipment.

During this time, the threat of nuclear war between the two empires was like a shadow over the entire world. Diplomatic tensions were high, but neither nation pushed the "nuclear button." That's why the war was called "cold," because there were no actual battles. The real skirmishes were behind the scenes races to get information first and to keep the other side from finding out.

But in the late 1980's, something happened that few people expected. After 72 years of Communist rule, the Soviet Union collapsed. Its leaders declared that Communism hadn't really worked, and the union dissolved into nearly a dozen separate countries that didn't necessarily see the U.S. as an enemy any more.

The Cold War was over. But the relationships among the many different allies changed. Instead of two arch-rival teams, there was one team and a bunch of free agents. For the past several years, experts have been trying to sort out these changes, and predict how they relate to new developments in science, technology and population.

Recently the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) released a public report about what it thinks the world will be like in the year 2015. The report, called "Global Trends 2015," could help Bush and his cabinet make important decisions on how the U.S. interacts with other countries.

"Global Trends 2015" makes a lot of general predictions. Pollution, for example, will continue to be a problem. And a shortage of water will CIAthreaten some places. Terrorism, both within the U.S. and in other countries, will likely increase. And the threat of nuclear war will be replaced with growing concerns about chemical and biological weapons. Advances in medicine will help people live longer but these people will also need support as they grow old. The report doesn't offer specific solutions to these problems. But it provides information to help Bush and his advisers figure out some answers.

Here's the CIA's take on some hot spots around the world:

The Middle East

The CIA thinks the hostile standoff between Israel Middle East mapand the Palestinians in the Middle East won't get any better. In order for this region's outlook to improve, the governments must make some basic changes -- like improving education. But the CIA doubts these kinds of improvements will happen.

China

The CIA isn't sure what's going to happen in China. It thinks that the kind of government China has -- a communist one -- won't be very good at handling the economic changes the country needs to make in order to trade with other nations. But the CIA also knows that China can bounce back because it's done it in the past. A very weak or very strong China could be a "security risk" for the U.S. if it decided that war, not peace, was the best way to act.

Russia

The "Great Bear" is in big trouble. It isn't as strong as it used to be, and the country may not be able to adjust to having very little power among other nations. The government may have trouble keeping control, if poverty, unemployment and ethnic conflict get out of hand. Unfortunately there isn't much that either the U.S. or its allies in Europe can do about it. Russia has to solve its internal problems by itself, the CIA says.

Japan

Japan lost a lot of money in the mid-1990s and it still hasn't completely recovered. Compared to China, its economy is growing much more slowly. Japan may decide to have a stronger military than it does now, and this will change its relationship with both the U.S. and China. Like Russia, these decisions are up to the Japanese government.

India

The CIA thinks we should watch India very closely. Its population, economy, and technological development are growing very fast, and so is theIndia gap between its rich and poor people. India is an ambitious country, and this ambition may not be good for its relations with its neighbors China and Russia, as well as Japan and the West. India will probably continue its own Cold War with Pakistan as the two countries keep their nuclear missiles aimed at each other.

When to get involved

President Bush and his advisers will be keeping an eye on many countries at once. But they also will likely be less involved in international disputes than President Clinton was. Several key Bush advisers have said they think the U.S. is over-involved in other countries and should focus more attention on developments within the United States.

At the same time, they realize that the world is more connected than ever before and what happens in once place can send ripples around the world. When things get bad in the Middle East, for example, gas prices go up in the U.S. And there are times when the U.S. intervenes in other countries to try to protect innocent people -- like ethnic minorities -- from being hurt or killed. Sometimes people in other countries ask the U.S. for help. But it's often hard to decide when to step in and when the U.S. should mind its own business. It's now up to the Bush team to make those tough calls.

What do you think?What foreign policy advice would you give President Bush? When should the U.S. get involved in other countries? What obligations does the U.S. have to its friends? When should the U.S. take action against its enemies?

-Contributed by Alexander S. Houston