|
|
Voucher
Decision Fight
For The Pledge Spencer Michels looks at the debate over the phrase
"under God" in the pledge of allegiance. Drug
Testing School
Vouchers Cleveland
Vouchers Read
more Education
Outside
Links: The American Civil Liberties Union |
Courts
Alter Student Rights Some important legal
decisions made in the last few weeks could change life for millions
of students when they return to School administrators are already assessing what key court rulings on school vouchers, random drug testing and the possible removal of the phrase "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance will mean for public school students. Victory for Vouchers Before closing the 2001-2002 session in June, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two decisions concerning student rights. The first case involved
a program in Ohio that issued school vouchers. Vouchers are coupons
parents can use to help pay for private or religious Vouchers are usually given to student families in areas where public schools are in poor condition. The families can apply voucher money to tuition at a better school. Opponents say the
program violates the First Amendment to the Constitution, which says
government cannot establish, or support, a religion. Critics think vouchers
paid for with taxpayer money should not be used to send students to
religious schools. From Football to Flute Another Supreme Court decision on student rights involved the case of Lindsey Earls, an Oklahoma high school student who competed on an academic quiz team and sang in the school choir. She sued her school
after they asked her to take a random drug test as a requirement By one vote, the High Court said schools could test all students involved in an activity or team that may participate in any type of competition -- from the football team to the debate team. A majority of the justices said the ability of schools to discourage drug use was more important than an individual student's right to privacy. I Pledge Allegiance... Another legal decision dealing with school life came from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, California.
Like the school voucher case, he felt the pledge violated the constitutional separation of church and state and took his case to court.
After some consideration, two of the three judges on the appeals court agreed with Newdow that reciting the pledge was an unconstitutional "endorsement of religion" and therefore declared the pledge itself to be in violation of the Constitution. The court's decision was not popular. Following a wave of criticism, the judge who wrote the decision put it on hold. Many expect that the ruling will be overturned in later hearings. However, if the ruling is not thrown out, it would become unconstitutional to recite the pledge in schools in nine states.
-- Contributed by Maureen Hoch, Online NewsHour |
PBS Online Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Our Mission | FAQ Copyright © MacNeil-Lehrer Productions All Rights Reserved |