 | |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
North
Korea Agrees to Halt Nuclear Program |
Posted:
02.14.07
|
 |
 |
North Korea has agreed to freeze its nuclear program in return
for aid, ending a long diplomatic stalemate. But the country's
record of broken promises has left the international community
skeptical that it will disarm completely.
Printer-friendly version: PDF
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
As a start, the communist nation says it will shut down its
main plutonium processing plant in Yongbyon within two months
and allow the return of United Nations arms control inspectors
who had been expelled four years ago.
"The
goal is the complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization
of the Korean peninsula. This is a good beginning to that effort,"
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told reporters.
In return for disarmament, the United States and four regional
partners -- China, Japan, South Korea and Russia -- would provide
short-term economic, energy and humanitarian assistance to help
North Korea's impoverished people. Human Rights Watch says 1 million
North Koreans died in 1990s famines and that millions are now
at risk of starvation.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Broken promises
and caution |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Negotiators are proceeding cautiously because North Korea has
reneged on similar agreements.
In
2002, North Korea began secretly enriching uranium for the purpose
of making nuclear weapons, according to the United States, violating
a 1994 agreement exchanging energy aid for disarmament.
In 2003, North Korea withdrew from the nuclear nonproliferation
treaty, an international nuclear arms control agreement administered
by the International Atomic Energy Agency. And in 2005, the government
announced it possessed weapons-grade plutonium.
The chance for negotiation reached a low in October 2006, when
North Korea detonated a nuclear weapon, leading the United Nations
to vote unanimously to impose wide-ranging economic and diplomatic
sanctions.
Now, four months after the nuclear test, U.S. Assistant Secretary
of State Christopher Hill, the top American official at the recent
round of negotiations, said a step-by-step approach would be best
for building trust with North Korea.
"It's certainly not the end of the process, it's really
just the end of the beginning of the process," Hill told
reporters, according to the Associated Press.
|
 |
 |
 |
Energy aid
for North Korea |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
As a first step, the cooperating nations have promised North
Korea 5 percent of an aid package that could include 1 million
tons of fuel oil (worth about $250 million), which would represent
about two-thirds of the country's yearly consumption.
The
five countries are expected to share the costs, though Japan is
abstaining until North Korea accounts for Japanese citizens kidnapped
in the late 1970s and 1980s and the U.S. Congress would have to
approve the American contributions.
The deal could provide twice the amount of oil that was outlined
in the failed 1994 agreement, leading to criticism from analysts.
Nicholas Eberstadt, a North Korea expert from the American Enterprise
Institute, told the NewsHour the deal "only freezes part,
at most, of North Korea's nuclear activities, for a much higher
price than the earlier agreement, with a regime that we now know
operates in bad faith on nuclear deals."
Rice said this plan differs from the 1994 agreement because it
includes North Korea's main trading partners, Russia and China,
who have the power "not only to make a deal to but to make
sure one sticks."
|
 |
 |
 |
No deadlines
for future diplomacy |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
If North Korea successfully dismantles its program -- no deadlines
have yet been set -- it could lead to the removal of North Korea
from the list of terror-sponsoring states.
Diplomats hope it could also lead to a peace agreement to replace
the 1953 Korean War-ending cease-fire that created the heavily
armed Demilitarized Zone currently separating the two Koreas.
Rice told reporters successful diplomacy with North Korea could
lead to a similar agreement with Iran, which has refused to stop
its nuclear program.
But
John Bolton, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations,
disapproved of the plan, telling CNN, "It sends exactly the
wrong signal to would-be proliferators around the world."
Bolton said the deal was flawed because it doesn't ask North
Korea to give up its stock of nuclear arms and plutonium.
The Institute for Science and International Security estimates
that North Korea could have enough plutonium to build as many
as 13 nuclear weapons now and 17 by mid-2008.
And questions remain whether North Korean leader Kim Jong Il
will completely turn over his country's nuclear weapons, his primary
international bargaining chip.
Though Rice told reporters, "The joint statement covers
the fact that North Korea must declare and abandon all of its
nuclear programs, and everybody understands what 'all' means,"
North Korea's state-run media interpreted the statement as asking
for a "temporary" suspension of its nuclear program.
--Compiled
by Adnaan Wasey for NewsHour Extra
Do you have an opinion about this article? Or do you have
a personal experience related to this article that you'd like
to share with our readers? Click
here to submit your story.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|