Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Home
Home
Resources for Students
Arts

Science
Math and Economics

World

U.S. History

Health / Fitness
Resources for Teachers & Educators

Click here for more current events lesson plans matched to national standards.

How to use this story in a classroom...

Online NewsHour:
Vote 2004

2004 Democratic National Convention

Forum: Security vs. Civil Rights.

Report: The American Civil Liberties Union has filed suit against the city of Denver over its surveillance of community activists. 03.13.03

Report: Artists and poets find creative ways to protest a potential war with Iraq. 03.12.03

Report: The Philadelphia Police Commissioner discusses protests and the police response during the week of Republican National Convention. 06.03.00

Browse the NewsHour's coverage of law, federal agencies, terrorism.

NewsHour Extra:
Vote 2004

Student Editorial: Teens Protest Democratic Convention. 07.28.04

Lesson Plan: Your Safety or Your Civil Liberties: Which is More Important?

Update: Is the government protecting U.S. citizens from future terrorist attacks or invading their privacy. 02.12.03.

Outside Links:
Federal Bureau of Investigation

U.S. Department of Justice

American Civil Liberties Union

Extra is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

FBI Accused of Intimidating Would-be-Protesters Leading Up to Political Conventions
Posted: 08.23.04

In the run up to the Republican National Convention in New York City, local and national law enforcement are investigating people they say may be planning violent acts; protesters say that police are going too far and infringing on free speech rights.

Printer-friendly versions: HTML / PDF

Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the debate between the needs of the nation to protect its citizens from harm and the rights of citizens to express their thoughts and opinions has intensified.

Anti-war protestersThis debate has taken on a new energy recently. Leading up to the Republican National Convention in New York City starting Aug. 30, civil rights groups and members of Congress have accused the FBI of using intimidation tactics on known activists to prevent protests outside the event.

Reading and Discussion Questions

"The FBI's intimidation and interrogation of peaceful protesters brings back eerie echoes of the days of J. Edgar Hoover," said Anthony Romero, ACLU executive director, in a Web site statement. "Resources and funds established to fight terrorism should not be misused to target innocent Americans who have done nothing more than engage in lawful protest and dissent."

The FBI, however, says because it has no evidence of a "specific plot," it must be vigilant in preventing violence at all events of this scale.

Preparing security for the convention

New York City police have been preparing for the protests by shoring up their arsenal of peace-keeping paraphernalia including bomb-defending devices, bullet-proof armed personnel carriers and high-tech helicopters. The department also has infiltrated protest organizing meetings by sending police officers, disguised as young, scruffy protesters, to gather information.

New York Mayor Michael BloombergMeanwhile, the city government won a federal court battle with protesters from United for Peace and Justice over the route of protest marches on Aug. 29. Protesters wanted to use Central Park's Great Lawn for the occasion. The city has argued that the 250,000 people expected on the lawn would damage the grass and make the park unusable through the fall.

On the national level the FBI has been questioning would-be-demonstrators from around the country about potential violence at the Republican convention as the agency did before the Democratic convention held in Boston in July.

Many of those contacted and questioned are known to the FBI for having participated in past political demonstrations in at least six states: Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri and New York.

Protesters at the Democratic National ConventionNate Hoffman, a 21-year-old economics student at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, told the Associated Press that FBI agents first approached him and another student on July 23. Hoffman, who said he used to consider himself an anarchist, agreed to meet with agents at a coffee shop but wouldn't answer any questions without a lawyer.

"They told me that in their experience that when somebody didn't want to talk to them that meant they probably had something to hide," he said.

"You always hear that when you become politically active, you're put on some list. But it doesn't become real until you get a visit from the FBI," Hoffman added.

Critics respond

Critics of these tactics, including Democratic members of Congress and the American Civil Liberties Union, argue that questioning would-be demonstrators may violate the First Amendment right to free speech.

"Political interrogation without suspicion of criminal activity hearkens back to the bad old days of the McCarthy era," said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union. "The FBI does not have a right to intimidate people for criticizing the government."

Anti-war protesters in New YorkAccording to Lieberman, three Missouri activists were given subpoenas to testify before a grand jury for a domestic terrorism investigation held on the day they planned to travel to Boston to protest, preventing them from protesting.

On Aug. 17 three Democratic members of the House of Representatives wrote a letter to the Justice Department asking that it investigate the FBI's actions, writing that the inquiries seemed to represent "systematic political harassment and intimidation of legitimate antiwar protesters"

Many activists say that the mere presence of an FBI agent is intimidating.

"Just a visit by the FBI has overtones," said 68-year-old activist John Young who claims the government has been monitoring his Web site since last year. "Whether you've done anything wrong or not, you think, 'Oh no.'"

FBI /Police Response

Justice Department and FBI officials defended their efforts to question potential protesters, saying they are trying to detect Philadelphia riot policeand prevent violence at the Republican convention and other important political events.

"Violent acts are not protected by the U.S. Constitution," Cassandra Chandler, an assistant director of the bureau, said in statement on Aug. 16. "The FBI has a duty to prevent such acts and to identify and bring to justice those who commit them," she added.

-- Annie Schleicher, Online NewsHour

Daily Buzz



MaKenzie Jones
Rising from the Ashes: A Joplin Teen Reflects
Joplin was able to rise from the ashes because of help from everyone. And I am eternally grateful to anyone who made that possible.
MaKenzie, Joplin, Mo.

Debating The News
My Story
Editorial Page
Poetry


Click here to find out how your essay or poem could appear on NewsHour Extra.