 | |  |
 |
|
|
|
Bridge
Collapse May Be Warning Signal of U.S. Infrastructure |
Posted:
08.08.07
|
|
|
With the collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge in Minnesota,
transportation regulators and civil engineers are examining the
systems that build and inspect the hundreds of thousands of bridges
across the country.
Printer-friendly version: PDF
|
|
|
|
|
 The
eight-lane Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed Aug.
1 during evening rush hour traffic, falling more than 60 feet
into the Mississippi River. Five people are known dead, nearly
100 were injured and eight people remain missing nearly a week
later.
Officials at the National Transportation and Safety Board, the
federal agency charged with regulating America's civil transportation
safety issues, have not determined the cause of the collapse and
the investigation could take up to 18 months.
Constructed between 1964-1967, the I-35W bridge is considered
a truss arch bridge. The truss is a simple skeletal structure
with no piers built into the river bed and a single steel arch
over the 390-foot wide expanse of water. Before the collapse,
up to 144,000 vehicles used the bridge each day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating bridges |
|
|
|
|
|
The I-35W bridge, along with other U.S. bridges, had been inspected
and rated by transportation officials. The Minneapolis bridge
had been rated "structurally deficient" in 1990.
According to the Department of Transportation, such bridges need
"significant maintenance attention, rehabilitation or replacement."
But the agency considers them safe for use. Over 70,000 other
U.S. bridges have this classification.
 The
National Bridge Inspection Program rates bridges so that states
can prioritize money for bridge repair and replacement.
However, states often use transportation funds to build highways
and bridges instead of fixing the ones they have.
According to Minnesota transportation officials, the I-35W's
low rating was due to corrosion in the bridge's bearings and steel
end joints as well as fatigue cracks, but that recent inspections,
in 2005 and 2006, had not shown an increase in any of the cracks.
"We thought we had done all we could, but obviously something
went terribly wrong," said Dan Dorgan, state bridge engineer
for the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
|
|
|
|
Evaluating
the inspection system |
|
|
|
|
|
"They may well have been doing everything that has been
prescribed in the national bridge inspection program. That may
well not be enough," Mark Rosenker, NTSB chairman told reporters
last week, TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press reported .
"There may be some failures in the reporting system that
was done here in Minneapolis."
Federal officials have said the program will be reviewed, "top-to-bottom."
But, Rosenker added, Americans should be confident that U.S.
bridges are safe.
"I don't believe that they should be worried at all,"
said Rosenker, the Associated Press reported.
|
|
|
|
The way we
build bridges |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes may occur in bridge inspection but some civil engineers,
like Stephen Kurtz, assistant professor at Lafayette College in
Pennsylvania, don't believe that the tragic accident in Minnesota
will radically change the way we build bridges.
Structural design, since 1967 when the I-35W opened, has not
changed much, Kurtz said, but computers have radically changed
the ways engineers analyze the impact of traffic, snow, wind and
other factors.
"Before you had hand calculations and approximations. Now,
using a computer, you have fewer approximations," Kurtz said.
Kurtz has also said that new technologies, such as ultrasonic
sound waves to detect fatigue cracks, are improving bridge inspections.
Not all civil engineers agree with Kurtz.
Duke University professor Henry Petroski argues that the computers
still use the same formulas.
 "Mostly
the analytical tools that are used and the way the stresses and
strains are calculated are really old. We may use computers that
seem to be doing things better, but they're really only doing
the old stuff faster," Petroski told Discover Magazine.
But the biggest change in bridge design, according to Kurtz,
is economics. Complicated designs, like those seen in truss bridges,
are often too expensive to build now with the rising cost of labor
in the United States.
"Every bridge in the 1930s was a truss bridge and it was economics.
Metal was expensive then and they are very efficient in terms
of materials. Materials have gotten cheaper adjusted for inflation
but that's not the case for labor costs, which have gone up, even
adjusted for inflation," Kurtz said.
So now, many U.S. bridges are designed to be more efficient to
build, such as box girder bridges, whose supports are shaped like
hollow boxes, and cable bridges such as suspension and cable-stayed
bridges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
Compiled by Annie Schleicher for NewsHour Extra
Do you have an opinion about this article? Or do you have
a personal experience related to this article that you'd like
to share with our readers? Click
here to submit your story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It makes me want to come to school every day, and it has given me something that I’m really good at.
