 | |  |
 |
|
|
|
U.S.
Central Bank Lowers Key Interest Rates to Boost Economy |
Posted:
09.19.07
|
|
|
The Federal Reserve, the nation's central bank, lowered two key
interest rates to prevent problems in the housing market from
seeping into the U.S. economy and causing a recession.
Printer-friendly versions: PDF
|
|
|
|
|
The Federal Reserve cut the federal funds rate, the amount of
interest that banks pay other banks to borrow money overnight,
by half a percentage point from 5.25 percent to 4.75 percent.
The Fed also cut the discount rate, the amount charged on loans
to banks, by the same amount, dropping it to 5.25 percent.
In a statement, the Federal Reserve said, "The tightening
of credit conditions has the potential to intensify the housing
correction and to restrain economic growth more generally."
This is the first cut in this interest rate in four years and
economists hope that by making it cheaper for banks to borrow
money they will be more likely to lend money to consumers for
such things as cars, homes or small businesses.
And when consumers can more easily borrow money, the overall
economy is stimulated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled
housing market |
|
|
|
|
|
Economists say that the rate cut was a response to a drop in
housing prices and trouble in the mortgage and lending industries.
Over the past year, many people who borrowed money to purchase
homes have seen the interest rates on their loans rise. At the
same time, the price of the average house dropped. In some cities,
homes have fallen by hundreds of  thousands
of dollars since 2005.
As payments each month get more expensive and houses are worth
less, many people who are unable to pay their mortgages -- or
home loans -- are losing their homes to the bank in foreclosure.
Many of these people were what are called subprime borrowers.
They were given expensive home loans even if they did not necessarily
have the money to continue to pay their monthly bills when the
interest rates increased.
When this happens to a lot of people at the same time the people
and financial institutions who lend this money in the first place
are more reluctant to do so and it's harder for most people to
borrow money.
|
|
|
|
The fed says
'we're on top of things' |
|
|
|
|
|
But the rate
cut is a way for the federal government to respond to this crisis
and keep it from creating a recession-a period of economic slowdown.
"What it does is it sends a very strong signal to markets
that  the
fed is on top of things, that the fed does not want this crunch
to become anything worse, and especially not to spill over to
the rest of the economy," economist Nariman Behravesh from
Global insight told National Public Radio.
"So it's a way of signaling to the market, 'we know there's
a problem, we're doing something about it. Don't worry, don't
panic,'" he added.
|
|
|
|
A bigger
cut |
|
|
|
|
|
Market analysts expected the cut to be smaller, only a quarter
of a percentage point, and in response to the bigger cut, the
stock market rose. On Tuesday the Dow Jones Industrials rose by
336 points, its biggest one-day point gain in five years.
 "I
think they're trying to shock the patient back to life,"
Ethan Harris, chief economist of Lehman Brothers, told the Washington
Post.
"Instead of a series of measured, modest steps to they and
keep the economy growing, the Fed appeared inclined to take bold
action that might calm financial markets and abruptly halt any
further slide in economic growth," he added.
|
|
|
|
Finding a
balance |
|
|
|
|
|
But some economists think the rate cut was a mistake and that
the Federal Reserve, led by economist Ben Bernanke, should be
concerned more about inflation fears.
Inflation is when there is too much money in the system and the
prices of everyday items rises.
"If we get a few decent economic numbers in the next couple
of months and some signs of inflation, all of a sudden Bernanke
has put himself in a tough spot," Richard Yamarone, chief
economist of Argus Research, told the Washington Post.
--
Compiled by Annie Schleicher for NewsHour Extra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both performances were incredibly underwhelming, and offered no real reason for Americans to change their votes. Neither candidate seemed willing to go out on a limb to garner support.
