Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
       
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page   Print This Page  
the Online NewsHour EXTRANews for Students AND Teacher Resources MAIN: ONLINE NEWSHOUR
7 - 12 grade level
SEARCH
ALL OR STUDENT VOICES LESSON PLANS VIDEO GO
Main: NewsHour ExtraU.S.WorldScienceEconomicsHealthArts and MediaStudent VoicesTeacher Center

Supreme Court Rules Age Matters in Miranda Warnings

Posted: 6.22.11
PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION: PDF
Teenagers who are removed from class for questioning by the police must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to a lawyer, according to a recent decision from the Supreme Court.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that age matters when it comes to police interrogation.

The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that law enforcement officers who remove juveniles from class must read them their Miranda Rights -- the “you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you in a court of law” speech you hear on TV and the movies.

In her majority opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated, “[C]hildren cannot be viewed simply as miniature adults” and “a reasonable child subjected to police questioning will sometimes feel pressured to submit when a reasonable adult would feel free to go.” 

In dissent, the more conservative judges said that the ruling placed an added burden on law enforcement officers and would hamper their ability to do their job in certain cases.

What are Miranda Rights?


The Miranda rights do not have to be read in any particular order, and they do not have to precisely match the language of the Miranda decision, as long as they are adequately and fully conveyed.

The Miranda Rights were put in place after the Supreme Court's landmark 5-4 decision in the case, Miranda v. Arizona, in 1966.

Miranda Rights are issued to suspects of crimes by arresting officers to let the accused know of their constitutional rights – the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney -- before they are interrogated.

Information provided by the person accused of a crime cannot be used in trial unless the prosecution can show the defendant was informed of his rights.

The question before the court in the recent case had to do with the definition of “in custody” and whether a reasonable person would have felt free to leave. The court concluded that teenagers are likely to think they are not free to leave an interrogation even if a reasonable adult would think otherwise.

J.D.B v. North Carolina


The courts have ruled that the warning must be "meaningful", so it is usually required that the suspect be asked if he understands his rights. Sometimes, firm answers of "yes" are required. Some departments and jurisdictions require that an officer ask "do you understand?" after every sentence in the warning.
In the case, J.D.B v. North Carolina, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a 13-year-old student who was removed from class for questioning by police who suspected him of two home break-ins.

A uniformed officer questioned J.D.B for 30 minutes in a closed-door conference room, along with an investigator, the assistant principle and the administrative intern.

The suspect first denied his involvement in the crimes but later confessed. Only after his confession was the student informed that he could have refused to answer any questions and was free to leave.

Two juvenile petitions were filed against the boy, charging him with breaking and entering and with larceny. His public defender appealed the case, arguing that the jury should not have been allowed to hear evidence taken from the interrogation because it was given before he was informed of his Miranda Rights.

Suspect’s age must be considered


Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Elena Kagan joined Sonia Sotomayor in the 5-4 vote.
The Supreme Court’s decision means police willneed to consider a suspect’s age.

Justice Sotomayor outlined a two-part test to determine whether a suspect is "in custody" for Miranda purposes: "[W]hat were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and…given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave."

The justices who joined Sotomayor in the majority were Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Elena Kagan.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the dissent, arguing that the decision complicates a simple task and forces police to make in-the-moment decisions that could upset the balance between society’s and a suspect’s interests. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia.
--Compiled by Brent Woodie for NewsHour Extra
Resources
Classroom Activity:
How to Use This Story in the Classroom

Student Worksheet:
Reading Comprehension and Discussion Questions

In-depth Coverage:
Supreme Court

PDF -Background information

Daily Video Clip

In the News
Nintendo Reports First Annual Losses in Decades
Nintendo Reports First Annual Losses in Decades


Blind Chinese Activist Is Center Of China-U.S. Diplomatic Crisis



Attack on Girls School Marks Pivotal Moment for Women in Afghanistan

Student Voice
MaKenzie Jones
Rising from the Ashes: A Joplin Teen Reflects
Joplin was able to rise from the ashes because of help from everyone. And I am eternally grateful to anyone who made that possible.
MaKenzie, Joplin, Mo.
Send us your essay, personal story or poem
SUBMIT

Related Coverage

Extra: News for Students
FORMATION AND FUNCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT
How the Supreme Court Affects the Lives of Teens
Court Weighs School's Right to Strip Search Students

The PBS NewsHour
Supreme Court Rules 5-4 That Age Matters in Miranda Warnings
Supreme Court Rules Suspects Must Tell Police They Wish To Remain Silent
Will High Court Tweak Well-Known Miranda Right?

SUGGESTIONS / COMMENTS
Do you have an opinion about this article? Or do you have a personal experience related to this article that you'd like to share with our readers? Submit your comments!
FRIDAY
A Timely Drop in Gas Prices for Memorial Day Trips
News Wrap: SpaceX 'Dragon' Reaches Space Station
Partial Vote Count in Egypt Reveals Public Rift
What a Muslim Brotherhood Win Might Mean for U.S.
The Legacy of Etan Patz
Are U.S. Nuclear Plants Ready for a Meltdown?
Brooks, Marcus on Coming Economic 'Chaos,' Bain
When the Ancient Past Reaches Out and Touches Us
An hour-long daily news broadcast.