Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Home
Resources for StudentsExtra: Vote 2004
Arts

Science
Math and Economics

World

U.S. History

Health / Fitness
Resources for Teachers & Educators

Click here for more current events lesson plans matched to national standards.

Online NewsHour Special Reports:

Vote 2004: Presidential Debates

Debating Our Destiny

Columnists discuss the final presidential debate. 10.14.04

Columnists discuss the second presidential debate. 10.08.04

Voters, Political Pundits Split on Vice Presidential Debate. 10.06.04

Political analysts offer instant assessment of night's clash. 10.05.04

Political operatives discuss what Vice President Cheney and Senator Edwards each did to boost their parties run for the White House. 10.05.04

A group of likely voters critique the presidential debate between President Bush and John Kerry. 10.01.04

A discussion about the debating styles of President Bush and John Kerry. 10.01.04

An historical look at presidential elections. 09.28.04.

Browse the NewsHour's coverage of Politics & Campaigns and the White House.

NewsHour Extra:
Vote 2004

Lesson Plan: Watching the Presidential Debates

Lesson Plan: Hold an In-Class Post-Presidential Debate

Outside Links:
White House

Bush-Cheney

Kerry-Edwards

Library of Congress

Extra is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Student Debater Analyzes Final Presidential Debate
Posted: 10.14.04

President Bush and Senator Kerry met Wednesday for the third and final debate of the 2004 presidential election. The debate, from Tempe, Ariz., focused exclusively on domestic issues and ranged from homeland security and the shortage of flu vaccines to gun control, abortion and religion. Dan Boada, a top student debater, assesses their matchup.

Click here to read Dan's bio.

Evaluating the winner of the third 2004 presidential debate depends on evaluating the goals of the competitors trying to "win." Unfortunately, the realization of those goals depends more on post-debate spin than anything else, but it's still worthwhile to evaluate the performances themselves.

Senator Kerry, Bob Shieffer and President BushPolitically, if the Kerry campaign is looking to accelerate further as a result of this debate, it probably won't happen; his performance was little, if at all, stronger than last Friday's, and the polls were barely effected by that round. In terms of holding momentum though, Senator Kerry certainly did not falter, and that should cause the Bush camp some concern.

President Bush, for his part, made ground on several arguments and solidified his image as clear and principled, while opening a new front on some of Mr. Kerry's statistics that the senator did not have time to fully cover.

The thing we can't forget though is that the debates are dubious thermometers of the political climate; after the media reshaped the public's image of the debates in 2000, President Bush "won" and shot up from four to nine points in most polls, although he lost the popular vote by half a million ballots.

Style and argument

The most obvious development in style was behind Senator Kerry's podium. Earlier in the debate he was slightly personal in his description of his Roman Catholic upbringing, his Senator John Kerrydisagreements with the archbishop and his stance on homosexuality. He opened a completely new horizon, though, in his response to the final question on the effect of strong women on his life. Beginning with an open jab at his own marriage to billionaire Teresa Heinz Kerry, he then moved to describe the death of his mother, bringing up the "Integrity, integrity, integrity" quote he utilized in the early campaign. Both the incipient comedy and the dramatic personal reference were uncharacteristic of Mr. Kerry's prosecutorial mien, and revealed a dynamic in his person that voters had never before seen.

President Bush, for his part, opened the debate with strong attacks and empirical evidence against Senator Kerry's fiscal responsibility, in a very Kerry-like manner. His new elaboration of Mr. Kerry's senate voting record numbers, the over 1 trillion dollar tax gap in the senator's plan (which Mr. Kerry never defended), and his dichotomy of Senator Kerry's plans as either complaint lists or unfunded "bait and switch" politics made his opening attacks seem much like the aggressive, warranted speeches that won the first two debates for Mr. Kerry. The fresh attack settled down quickly though, and as the questions moved through outsourcing, health insurance and social security, Senator Kerry moved back onto the attack.

All things considered, the president tended to have stronger stances and a more fitting style for the value oriented President George Busharguments: faith, abortion, and gay marriage. The dramatic pauses and charisma in his speeches naturally beat out Senator Kerry's formal, surgical approach to his speeches, shown in responses on questions like the influence of faith on his leadership. Mr. Kerry stood stronger on policy issues such as immigration or the minimum wage, and his capacity for summoning statistics and explaining them well outmatched Mr. Bush's.

One of the best examples of the senator's familiarity with the numbers is the dispute over educational Pell grants. Mr. Kerry opened by assaulting the president for weakening the grants; Mr. Bush responded by calling Kerry's attacks "misstatements" and citing the 1.1 million dollar grant increase under his administration. The senator came back strong in his rebuttal, explaining that the reason the number of grant applicants that were accepted increased was because the president's poor economy increased the number of students poor enough to be eligible. Mr. Kerry went on to explain that those receiving the grants were not getting their promised $5,100 because of the president's cuts in funding. President Bush never responded to this argument, and later in the debate summoned the same 1.1 million dollar new grant number, ignoring Senator Kerry's earlier comment. While certainly not a "knock out punch," small clashes like this evidenced Mr. Kerry's strength in policy issues.

Leading to the final stretch

The third presidential debate, of course, fell victim to the one thing it could scarcely avoid: recycling. With moderator Bob Schieffer being left with few new avenues of debate for the candidates to explore, the candidates were siphoned into what Bob SchiefferLynn Elber of the Miami Herald described as "familiar answers and edited stump speeches." Familiar sound bytes like "the liberal senator from Massachusetts," the "global test" (now Senator Kerry's revamped quotation, the "truth standard"), and "1.6 million jobs lost" reminded voters of how well our nation's candidates practiced for these performances, without really providing them with many new reasons to make up or change their minds.

Of the three, this debate will probably have the smallest influence on the voters, but it does mark the last 30 million viewer audience either candidate will see until Inauguration Day. With less than three weeks remaining before Decision 2004, the candidates left the podium with handshakes and smiles, and the voters with a final reiteration of what it is they will be voting for.

-- Daniel Boada, a senior at North Allegheny Senior High School in Wexford, Pa.

Daily Buzz



Emily
McCain, Obama Play it Safe in Second Debate
Both performances were incredibly underwhelming, and offered no real reason for Americans to change their votes. Neither candidate seemed willing to go out on a limb to garner support.
Emily, Woodstock, Georgia

Debating The News
My Story
Editorial Page
Poetry


Click here to find out how your essay or poem could appear on NewsHour Extra.