Student VoicesBack to student voices archive December 17, 2015
Paris Agreement is “first step” in addressing threat of climate change
Last year, I took a course called “Humanity and the Environment” which looked at human history through the lens of the natural world. We started the semester by reading foundational texts, such as religious creation stories and important early works of philosophy, making our way from the Paleolithic Era to the Postmodern Era. I studied how the world came to be; how humans used the earth for agriculture and how overuse has led to the point where political leaders need to meet — as they did during the last two weeks in Paris, France — to discuss the threatened future of the earth and mankind.
Before the class, I would not have considered myself an environmentalist. Sure, our use of the environment was destroying the earth, but we wouldn’t see the consequences anytime soon, at least not here. Right?
I was very wrong. Our careless abuse of the earth causes literal damage (climate refugees, droughts, floods, food and water shortages and the precarious future of ice sheets) and figurative (a dangerous, anthropocentric philosophy).
The ecological root of conflict in the war in Darfur, and local stories about environmental injustice in my own community, such as a sewage plant unfairly placed in a predominantly black neighborhood, show the true impact of abusing natural resources. From Syrian refugees to American teenagers, we’re all affected.
The Paris Agreement, a climate accord among nations that aims to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, reduce emissions from deforestation and mobilize climate finance, is the first step. The future of the planet relies on individual countries’ actions. The accord addresses this fact in its pragmatic approach to holding nations accountable for their progress in emissions reduction. The summit sent a strong signal, one that will hopefully resonate with lawmakers, business people and global citizens alike.
In 2016, I will be about to vote in the U.S. presidential election. I — and many other voters — am considering candidates’ stances on climate change policy. Republican presidential candidates for the 2016 election have expressed doubts about global warming and savaged President Obama’s climate change agenda, yet the majority of Republicans recognize that climate change exists and support regulation of carbon dioxide emissions, according to a recent report by the National Surveys on Energy and the Environment. The people’s support of climate change action might shape the candidates’ platforms as their campaigns evolve here in the U.S.
The power dynamics are complicated, the national interests are conflicting and the victims (think: least developed countries) of climate change are underrepresented in the international discourse. Still, the issue is not one we can afford to ignore any longer.
Soon we will all be in the hands of a changing climate, a sobering reminder that, at one time, the climate was in ours.
Sarah Warman Hirschfield is a senior at the Ethical Culture Fieldston School in New York City.
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of related content
Tooltip of RSS content 3
Lesson Plan: How to create a balanced budget — it’s a ‘Balancing Act’
How do we know that our government is fulfilling its duties to us, the public? How do we decide what those duties are? As efforts to pass the federal budget get underway, students will have the power to re-prioritize how money is spent using the interactive tool Balancing Act. What changes will they make? Continue readingBalancing ActBudgetbusiness educationEconomicseconomyfederal budgetFederal GovernmentGovernment & CivicshistoryPresidentSocial StudiesState Governmenttaxes
Young conservatives: Climate change is an issue for all of us
There is a growing movement among young conservatives, including evangelical Christians, who support environmental regulations. They say it’s important to act as faithful stewards of the earth. One group, the Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, has grown to 10,000 members in the past five years. Continue readingcarbon taxChristianityclimate changeclimate scienceconservatismconservativeevangelicalfossil fuelsGlobal WarmingGovernment & CivicsideologyPoliticsReligionScienceSocial Studies
Should seat belts be mandatory on school buses?
School districts around the country are debating whether or not to require seat belts on school buses. Requiring seat belts comes at a high cost for school districts already struggling with tight budgets. Continue readingbusDebateenglishEnglish & Language ArtsMaking the Gradeschool busschool busesschool safetyseat beltSocial Studies
Lesson plan: What’s your “Brief but Spectacular” take?
Every Thursday night, the PBS NewsHour profiles people and their passions in the series Brief but Spectacular. Creator Steve Goldbloom and his producing partner Zach Land-Miller wanted to find a new way to share original voices the public might otherwise not see. Now you can join the fun… Continue readingbrief but spectacularELAenglishEnglish & Language ArtsEnglish language learnersfilmIdentitySocial Studiesvideo
Lesson Plan: Storm chasing reveals clues to our weather future
Storm chasing: We do not recommend you try this at home! The top 208 weather…climate changeenvironmentenvironmental scienceextreme weatherNGSSScienceSRLSTEMstorm chasingstorms