Student VoicesBack to student voices archive August 23, 2012
What is the Russian Punk Rocker Trial Really About?
The trial of three women in a feminist punk rock band named Pussy Riot has captured the attention of the world. The three women were sentenced to two years in jail for hooliganism after a performance inside an Orthodox church.
This trial has highlighted the lack of free speech rights in Russia, and has caused many youth to speak out in solidarity with the band. Eugenia from Youth Journalism International wants other young people to understand what’s at stake in the Pussy Riot trial, and why they should care.
Pussy Riot could be just the name of a Russian punk rock girl band, but it has become the flag of a battle against injustice.
Pussy Riot is a punk rock group open to everybody. Its members invite Russian people to wear balaclavas as a form of protest against President Vladimir Putin’s repression, but that is not all. Three of its members were jailed after performing a controversial, anti-Putin song inside Moscow’s Orthodox Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
The performance was held against the Russian Orthodox Church leader after his support to Putin and was a sort of prayer to the Virgin Mary to free Russia from Putin’s destructive power. What happened to be a questionable but harmless protest cost the three young women two years of jail for “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred,” as the court stated.
With their protest, Maria Alyokhina, 24, Yekaterina Samutsevich, 29, and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, “undermined social order” and were blasphemous enough to deserve spending two years in prison, according to Judge Marina Syrova.
Pussy Riot, which began immediately before Putin’s re-election, is nothing but a group of young women wearing fluorescent balaclavas who decided to stand up for women’s rights and the freedom of expression. But standing up for gay and transsexual rights, gender equality and freedom of speech is a dangerous thing in Russia as the three of them have learned.
I believe in common respect, which includes religious respect. But I also believe the three members of Pussy Riot weren’t addressing their provocative performance towards Orthodox believers.
What is happening in Russia is nothing but another cover-up by the Russian government against its opposition. It is not very different from what had happened the day after Putin’s re-election: scores of protesters jailed for trying to state their opinion.
Russia is a country with a deep and intricate history, a huge land which is part of the European Union but with ties to the Middle East, strongly involved with both European and Asiatic matters.
Its power is silent but strong. For many European countries, Russia is the main (and only) source of gas, and Putin knows it well. With his puzzling grin, Putin holds his grip on international affairs and still plays a massive role in the Syrian matter. While standing with China in unshakably stating his support for Bashar al-Assad’s regime, he forces all nations to walk on eggshells.
The internal situation is not going any better, as proved by the Pussy Riot affair. Tolerance against the regime’s opponents is near zero, although the foreign press does not speak about it that much.
I believe in peaceful protest. But I also think that sometimes a strong and provocative protest is needed in order to gain the visibility it deserves.
The global reaction to the Pussy Riot affair proves I am not totally wrong. Global organizations, musicians, politicians and much more decided to stand up against the Russian court in support of the three young women.
This is immediately reassuring but still scares me a lot. This is our modern society: you have to be jailed in order to gain other people’s attention. People’s attention generates outrage. But what does outrage lead to?
We are a generation of outraged people who are still too lazy to stand up, take the remote control and switch channels. We are glad world leaders declare their indignation against injustice in the world, but then we forget it. Or, worse, we condemn a protest for not being politically-correct without asking ourselves why.
If we do not change, there will be more Putins re-elected in the world, more Syrias and an endless line of beautiful girls eager to undress to support an idea of power. But we will still have our outrage to console ourselves with.
Tooltip of related stories
Tooltip of more video block
Submit Your Student Voice
Tooltip of related content
Tooltip of RSS content 3
Trump and Clinton on race and police in first presidential debate
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump faced off Monday night in the first of three presidential debates leading up to this year’s election on Nov. 8. Continue readingCivicsDonald TrumpElection 2016Hillary ClintonpolicePresidential Debateraceracial divide
Student Reporting Labs STEM Lesson Plan: Climate Change, Salmon and NOAA
In this PBS Student Reporting Labs video, Oregon teens consult government agencies on the consequences of unchecked human actions on the natural environment. Students are exposed to the work of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the research and resources they provide. Continue readingagricultureartbiologychemistrydroughtearth scienceecologyenvironmental sciencefishNOAAoceanographysalmonScienceSocial StudiesSRLstudent reporting labs
Gerrymandering and partisan politics in the U.S.
The practice of drawing congressional district lines to benefit one political party over another is known as gerrymandering and dates back to the 19th century. Continue readingCivicsDemocratic PartyDemocratsElection 2016gerrymandergerrymanderingGovernmentRepublican PartyRepublicansSocial Studiesstate legislature
Debating Our Destiny: Do Presidential Debates Matter? – Lesson Plan
The presidential debates have been an important part of the U.S. election process for decades, but how much do they really influence voters? In this lesson, students will watch video clips from PBS NewsHour’s “Debating Our Destiny” with Jim Lehrer, which includes famous debate moments as well as interviews with the candidates themselves. Continue readingCivicsdebatingDonald TrumpElection 2016Hillary ClintonJim LehrerLee Banvillepresidential debatesPresidential ElectionSocial Studies
Where do the presidential candidates stand on education?
As Election Day approached, the candidates running for president have made and effort to appeal to parents, teachers and students by showing them where they stand on education.CampaignDonald TrumpeducationElection 2016Hillary Clinton