|
Using
NewsHour Extra Feature Stories
Overview:
NewsHour Extra features stories can help students identify and interpret
key issues in current events. This activity anticipates one class period,
but the follow-up essay might be assigned as homework, or in another period.
Warm Up: Use
initiating questions to introduce the topic and find out how much your
students know.
Main Activity:
Have students read NewsHour Extra's feature story and answer the questions
on the reading comprehension handout.
Discussion:
Use discussion questions to encourage students to think about how the
issues outlined in the story affect their lives and express and debate
different opinions.
Follow-up: Students
can write an 500-word editorial on the topic expressing their views and
send it to NewsHour Extra [extra@newshour.org]
for possible publication.
Evaluation:
Students are graded on their answers to reading comprehension questions
and/or their editorial.
Story: Supreme
Court Decides to Hear D.C. Gun Law Case, 11/26/07
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec07/gunlaw_11-21.html
Initiating Questions:
1. If you wanted
to go out and buy a gun, could you? What are the laws regarding gun ownership?
2 What is the Second Amendment? What does it say?
3. What is the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding laws?
Reading Comprehension
Questions: (click
here for printout)
1. What has the U.S.
Supreme Court agreed to do about the ban of handguns in Washington, D.C?
The U.S. Supreme
Court has decided to rule on whether Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban
is legal, setting the stage for a showdown over gun control laws that
could affect the 2008 presidential election.
The Supreme Court has decided to consider a petition filed in September
by the city of Washington, D.C., which asked the court to reverse a
lower court's decision to strike down the city's ban on handgun ownership.
2. What is the specific
law in question?
The 30-year-old
law in question makes it illegal to posses a handgun inside the city
but allows citizens to own shotguns or rifles. Most of the shootings
in the city are committed with handguns.
3. How did the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rule on the D.C. handgun ban? On
what did it base its conclusions?
The U.S. Court
of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in March 2007 ruled the ban violates
the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which states: "A
well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The appeals judges
decided in a 2-1 vote that the Second Amendment "protects an individual
right to keep and bear arms" and "once it is determined --
as we have done -- that handguns are 'arms' referred to in the Second
Amendment, it is not open to the District to ban them."
4. When did the Supreme
Court last hear a big gun rights case?
It will be the
first time the highest court in the land considers an important gun
rights case since 1939, according to the Washington Post.
5. Explain the difference
between the "individual" interpretation of the Second Amendment
and the "collective" interpretation.
A decision would
clarify whether the Second Amendment protects private gun ownership
(the "individual" interpretation) or only imparts a civic
right related to maintaining state militias (the "collective"
interpretation).
6. Explain the positions
of gun control advocates and gun rights advocates. How might a decision
impact each group's viewpoint?
Gun control advocates
want the government to be able to regulate weapons to protect innocent
people, while gun rights proponents argue that the Second Amendment
guarantees citizens a right to own weapons, primarily so that they can
protect themselves.
If the Supreme
Court sides with Washington, D.C. and upholds the handgun ban, it would
validate the legal arguments of the gun control camp.
If the court
sides with the appeals court and declares the D.C. ban unconstitutional,
it could become difficult, but not impossible, for the government to
regulate ownership and use of guns, according to the Legal Times.
7. How might the makeup
of the Supreme Court impact this case?
President Bush
recently replaced the conservative Chief Justice William Rehnquist and
the more moderate Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor with two solidly
conservative justices: Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice
Samuel Alito.
The court now
has four conservative-leaning justices and four liberal-leaning justices,
with Justice Anthony Kennedy straddling the middle.
This new lineup
gives conservative judicial decisions, like the D.C. court of appeals'
overturning of the handgun ban, a greater chance of becoming the law
of the land.
Discussion
Activity (more research might be needed):
1. Pretend you are
a member of the U.S. Supreme Court. Research the specific D.C. law and
arguments both for and against the handgun ban. What do you think? How
would you decide this case? In which camp does your opinion fall?
2. What are the gun
laws in your city or state? How do they compare to the D.C. law?
3. Looking to the
history of the United States, why do you think the issue of gun control
is so important to so many Americans? Cite specific historical references
in your answer.
4. What is the international
perspective on this issue? Where are there similar debates over gun ownership?
Write a 300-500 word
essay on any of these topics providing clear examples. Send your completed
editorial to NewsHour Extra (extra@newshour.org).
Exceptional essays might be published on our Web site.
|