Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
       
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page   Print This Page  
the Online NewsHour EXTRANews for Students AND Teacher Resources MAIN: ONLINE NEWSHOUR
7 - 12 grade level
SEARCH
ALL OR STUDENT VOICES LESSON PLANS VIDEO GO
Main: NewsHour ExtraU.S.WorldScienceEconomicsHealthArts and MediaStudent VoicesTeacher Center

Lesson Plan
CORRELATION TO NATIONAL STANDARDS

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE CONFIRMATION SIMULATION

Background, Activities and Critical Analysis
By Greg Timmons, teacher and executive director of The Constitution Project in Portland
Subject(s)
Civics, current events, government, social studies
Estimated Time
2 class periods
Grade Level
Grades 9-12
Objective

Students will:

1. Understand the fundamental roles of the Executive Branch and the Senate in the judicial selection process.
2. Understand that the process of selecting and confirming a Supreme Court justice is political in nature and that different groups will see the same nominee differently.
3. Consult and collaborate with fellow students on the merits of Supreme Court nominees.
4. Research and evaluate nominees to the Supreme Court.

Overview
This lesson is designed to be conducted in two days. The first day is for students to understand their roles in a mock-judicial hearing and some background on the president's nominee for the Supreme Court. It allows students to assume some of the main political positions held on a Senate Judiciary Committee conducting the hearings.

In this simulation, students will work in groups, assuming one of these positions, and will evaluate the candidate's qualifications and possible political persuasions. Since the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings may go on for many weeks, the teacher can extend the lesson to include student debates between the different Senate subcommittees or revisit the lesson when it is more convenient.

Due to the potential controversial nature of many of the topics discussed during the nomination hearings the teacher might want to review the materials and resources beforehand.

Although this lesson is designed to be completed in two class periods, class time may vary. It is suggested that students be given time in class and at home (if necessary) to prepare for the simulation on the first day and then conduct their evaluations of the candidates on the second day.

Background
With the retirement of Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, President Obama will nominate his second member to the Supreme Court in as many years. Justice Stevens was a mainstay of the Supreme Court's liberal wing.

Since the early days of the republic, the Senate has considered a nominees qualifications, the importance of the position and the prevailing political climate in providing advice and consent to the President on his nomination. Your sub-committee's task is to consider the nominee's qualifications and opinions on various issues and determine whether he should be approved by the Senate.

Procedure
1. Divide the class into four subcommittees each representing one of the different positions on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and pass out their respective student handouts. (With larger classes the teacher might want to create more than one subcommittee of each category to allow for smaller discussion groups. The teacher can also decide whether to place students in groups that are similar or different to their own personal views on the issues discussed in the subcommittee role descriptions.)

2. Give students time to review the history of judicial nominations and the role descriptions of their respective subcommittees. Answer any questions students might have before they begin their research.

3. Have students work in their subcommittees to research the president's nominee. They can go to the NewsHour special report on the Supreme Court at or any of the other major news outlets and/or interest groups' websites listed on their handout (and on the right navigation bar) for information. They should understand that the interest groups have specific agendas and might be favorable or unfavorable toward a specific candidate and that information from these sites should be taken in that context. If necessary, have students extend their research as a homework assignment.

4. On the second day, have students meet in their groups to briefly (10 minutes) discuss their findings from the day before. They have the option of coming to a consensus on the nominee or "agreeing to disagree" within their group. If this is the case, different members of each subcommittee should be allowed to present their views.

5. The teacher should then introduce the nominee or have one of the groups introduce the nominee with a brief biography.

6. Then have each group introduce themselves to the class by reviewing the role description on their student handout. After discussing their findings on the nominee using their research guide, the subcommittees should then vote on whether to accept or reject the nominee.

7. Have students do the follow up questions in either small group or general class discussion or as a written paper.

Follow-up questions:

  • What did you learn about the nominee you researched in class?
  • What is your personal opinion on whether or not you support this nominee as a replacement and why?
  • What challenges do you see to your nominee's appointment to the Court and from whom or where might these challenges arise?
  • Of all the people mentioned as potential nominees, who do you think would best fill Justice Stevens' position and why?
  • In what direction do you think the nominee would lead the country? What is your opinion on that?

Extension Activities
If time allows or at the teacher's discretion, students can extend the activity by asking the other groups clarification questions on their conclusions (assuming one group differs from another). They can also send up challenging statements that reflect their subcommittee's convictions on the various topics and try to convince the subcommittees of the merits of their decision. This can culminate in a class vote (or filibuster and the threat of the "nuclear option").

Last Updated: April, 2010

About the Author

Greg Timmons is a teacher, curriculum writer and executive director of The Constitution Project in Portland. He has taught middle school and secondary social studies for over 30 years, wrote lessons, and directed institutes on U.S. Constitution-related issues. He is a member of the board of directors of the Oregon Council for the Social Studies.


Additional Lesson Plans

Extra: News for Students
President Obama Nominates New Supreme Court Justice
Lesson Plan: The Supreme Court's Role in American Society
Supreme Court Justice Retiring; Obama Will Help Shape High Court
Court Weighs School's Right to Strip Search Students
Supreme Court Considers First Amendment, Sherman Act

The Online NewsHour
NewsHour Supreme Court Watch

To find out more about opportunities to contribute to this site, contact us.

The Materials You Need


Additional Resources for Teachers
NewsHour Supreme Court Watch
U.S. Senate Reference Site on Nominations
U.S. Supreme Court
The White House
Alliance for Justice
American Center for Law and Justice
People for the American Way
Progress for America

Send Us Your Feedback
Write Lesson Plans for ExtraContact Us
National Standards

McRel K-12 Standards Addressed:

Civics
-
Standard 5: Understands the major characteristics of systems of shared powers and of parliamentary systems
- Standard 15: Understands how the U.S. Constitution grants and distributes power and responsibilities to national and state government and how it seeks to prevent the abuse of power
- Standard 20: Understands the roles of political parties, campaigns, elections, and associations and groups in American politics

Language Arts (Reading)
Standard 7: Uses reading skills and strategies to understand and interpret a variety of informational texts
- Listening and Speaking
Standard 8: Uses listening and speaking strategies for different purposes
- Viewing
Standard 9: Uses viewing skills and strategies to understand and interpret visual media
- Working with Others
Standard 1: Contributes to the overall effort of a group
Standard 4: Displays effective interpersonal communication skills



FRIDAY
What's Next for the U.S. Drone Campaign?
News Wrap: Syria Is Said to Agree to Peace Summit
Oklahomans Help Each Other to Rebuild and Recover
New 'Development' for Delivering Entertainment
Political Wrap With Brooks and Marcus
A Look Inside the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy
An hour-long daily news broadcast.