|
President Clinton initiated a national debate
last year when he challenged members of Congress to "Save Social
Security first" and has continued to push for such reform. Since
then, there have been numerous drafts of ways to stabilize the program,
which will no longer support itself in 2013.
Proposals being discussed include, raising the eligibility age, increasing
the Social Security payroll tax or some form of privatization, which
would allow individuals to invest their social security in the stockmarket.
Although privatization has its strongest support amongst Republican
Congressmen, two senior ranking Democrats also embraced the idea. Senators
Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) and Robert Kerrey (D-NE) have introduced
"The Social Security Solvency Act of 1998," which would cut the Social
Security payroll tax by 2 percent and allow workers to invest the tax
cut in personal savings accounts.
The idea of privatizing Social Security set off a major debate. Henry
Aaron, senior fellow at the Brookings
Institution, stated that allowing Americans to play "financial roulette
with part of their core [economic] protection would undermine" Social
Security's purpose -- ensuring a reliable income for America's retirees.
But Carolyn Weaver, resident scholar at American Enterprise and proponent
of privatization, contends "it's no longer a question of whether we
will have private investment accounts in the years ahead for all Americans
to replace a portion of Social Security, but just how quickly we'll
get to that point."
Answering your questions are Henry Aaron, senior fellow at the Brookings
Institution and Carolyn Weaver, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute and director of AEI's Social Security and Pension
Project.
|