Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Program
Support
From:
ABOUT US  |  LOCAL TV LISTINGS    E-MAIL   PRINT      
PBS NewsHour
TopicsVideoRecent ProgramsTeacher ResourcesThe Rundown: news blogSubscribe rss | podcast


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Education
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: August 21, 2007

Teachers Address Education Law

Forum Introduction
Student at chalkboard Three 2007 Teacher of the Year awardees answered your questions about how No Child Left Behind has affected their classrooms, as Congress considers renewing the law.
QUESTIONS
Has NCLB affected your ability to teach creatively and to deal with students individually?
How do you suggest that students be given the attention they need?
What are the consequences in this law for the student who refuses to make an effort to learn?
What is your approach to dealing with English language learners?
Do you agree with the need for accountability by schools?
What advice to you have for aspiring teachers and those just starting out?
Are there any positive aspects of this law?
How has this law affected students with language or math learning disabilities?
Long of Houston asks:
How do you suggest that every opportunity be given to the student that needs just a little more attentiveness to reach their goals?
ANSWERS
Alan Lawrence Sitomer of Lynwood High School in Lynwood, Calif., responds:

Thanks for the question, it's a great one. And a question that, while simple, really necessitates me beginning by saying that there are no simple answers with which I can respond.

To begin, when you use the word "every opportunity" you must realize that I, being the perpetual optimist, want to take you literally and really deliver "every" opportunity. I therefore think you can see where it's most logical to begin: money.

First off, I teach in a Title I school that is hardly swimming in cash and still I do not believe that money is the ultimate cure to all our problems but if we as a society want to be honest with ourselves we have to realize that we are spending approximately $7,300.00 per year per pupil (at least in California) to educate a child while we are commensurately spending about $48,000.00 per year to incarcerate a juvenile delinquent. I think one can easily see that financially our priorities are askew. More money would provide better resources, smaller classes and more personnel. Basically, I am saying that if we infuse a horde of cash, we'll get better results. Heck, just look at the amount of kids in our classes. Our students to teacher ratios are brutally excessive (many, many classrooms this year across the nation will average a 37 to 1 student to teacher ratio). I'm no rocket scientist but it doesn't take a genius to see that if there were only 20 kids per class as opposed to 37, a teacher would have a far better chance of being more effective. Smaller classroom sizes bring more opportunity for learning.

And the reason we do not have smaller classroom sizes is because of money.

However, as I said, money is by no means the only thing we need so that every opportunity is given to students who need just a little more attentiveness to reach their goals. As a matter of fact, if we simply throw money at schools we are certainly not going to reap the benefits we want. We need other things.

First, we need better support in the home. Year after year the students who consistently excel in my class come from the group of people that have the best support from their families. It's not race, socio-economic status or whether or not there are two parents in the home. It boils down to support. Kids who get it on the home front have adults in their life who know how to get what their kids need from the schools and, much like a self-fulfilling prophesy, these kids get a taste of the "every opportunity" scenario which you mention. The little push comes from people outside of school pushing in consort with the people who are already pushing in school.

I also feel that to expand the opportunities we need to reinvent our education system. It was built for a prior era. An 11 week summer vacation is far too much time off. Kids regress tremendously in both their academic skills and their work habits and my feeling is that we'd be better able to provide more opportunities to all students if we expanded the school year. Kids need more time in the classroom if they are going to be successful and have all their needs met. Yes, I believe in vacations but these are sabbaticals we are providing and they do a lot more harm than good in my opinion.

Additionally, I feel that the community needs to become better partners with our schools. The business world does not partner enough with public education which is a bit ironic because at the same time they do not support our schools well they are commensurately dependent on the quality of the kids our nation's schools produce. Everyone knows we need help and yet very few folks actually reach out and give back to our schools in a way that has real substance. More people are starting to recognize this and take ownership of about this matter but not enough people are actually doing something right now. One does not need to be Bill Gates to make a difference. More people should get involved. Everyone has something to offer. That's where more attentiveness comes from. Asking our schools to do more is not going to be nearly as effective as asking our citizens to do more. We need much more help than our current education system can handle all by itself.


Josh Anderson of Olathe Northwest High School in Olathe, Kan., responds:

Excellent question! It is difficult to imagine that our current national school system is capable of preparing all children for their future. It is an antiquated factory model that belongs in the century in which it was created, and our nation needs to begin working aggressively to develop a new national school system.

Until we reach a national consensus that a new system is needed, we will continue to fix and repair our pioneer wagon with spaceship wing solutions and then wonder why we aren't flying faster.

The great news is that there is no shortage of opportunities to radically rethink and redesign our national school system. One proposal that has gained substantial traction is the "Tough Choices or Tough Times" report released in December of 2006. Few who read this report will remain unconvinced that our system needs to change and that the changes proposed in the report wouldn't be substantially better than the system we have now.


Julie Caccamise of Woodrow Wilson High School in Washington, D.C. responds:

Provide as many after school/before school opportunities for students to work with resources. I also find that it is important to create time for classroom conferencing and student self-reflection.

Next Question and Answer

ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: No Child Left Behind
Reports
  NCLB Basics
  Standardized Testing
  Teacher Accountability
  Federal vs. State Control
  of Education
  Impact on Special Needs Students
  Education Policy before NCLB
  Tales from the Frontlines
Resources
  Map: State-by-State Performance
  Take a Test
  Archive
Teachers Address Education Law



CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES







The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.