Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSTEACHER RESOURCESSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Health
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: October 30, 2007

Experts Discuss Bisphenol A

Forum Introduction
Baby bottle: Photo credit FDA The chemical bisphenol A (BPA) is used to make many plastic products used in American homes, including baby bottles. Recently, two expert panels examined whether BPA is likely to have adverse effects on human health. Two scientsts answered your questions on BPA.
QUESTIONS
Is there an online source to determine which plastics contain BPA?
Does my filtered water pitcher contain BPA?
What is my likely exposure level to BPA? What level is dangerous?
How does BPA get from a plastic water bottle into the water?
Do softer plastic bottles contain BPA?
Does BPA pose a risk to me as an adult?
Should I have my baby tested for exposure to BPA?
How may patients be exposed to BPA through dental sealants?
Does heat affect the release of BPA?
Emy Youngsmith of San Francisco, Calif., asks
What is the likely exposure level for U.S. citizens who are currently in their teens and 20s? What level is dangerous and is there anything that can be done to counteract any negative effects?
ANSWERS
Retha Newbold responds:
Retha Newbold responds:

There have been numerous attempts to estimate daily human exposure levels but each estimate requires some assumptions. To date, the best measure seems to be BPA levels in the blood (not really actual exposure levels however) which can be related to blood levels of BPA in experimental animals. For humans, levels of BPA are variable and are reported to range from about 0.2 to 4.4 ng/ml (part per billion) in fetuses, children and adults. A summary of BPA levels reported in humans can be found in Vandenberg et al., Reproductive Toxicology 24:139-177, 2007.

The important point to remember is that reported levels of BPA in humans are higher than the BPA concentrations shown to cause effects in laboratory experiments and are within an order of magnitude of the levels shown to cause effects in experimental animal models.

We do not know what level is dangerous. Another important point is that we do not know what age is the most sensitive. However, experimental animal models suggest that fetal and early childhood exposure is the most vulnerable to BPA.

Earl Gray responds:
Earl Gray responds:

The exposure levels are being determined by laboratories at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Some older data are unreliable.

A recent report from this lab stated that free BPA was not detectable in the urine of the average individual and the highest level was a little above one part per billion (PPB). Total BPA (free and inactive metabolite) levels were a little higher but still in the low PPB range. Levels in milk were about threefold higher than in urine.

The debate rages about what levels of PBA are dangerous. In a review of 700 papers, our panel did not find convincing evidence of reproducible, adverse low-dose reproductive effects. All the robust studies--ones that used a wide range of doses, enough animals to detect subtle effects, measured a wide range of reproductive endpoints, were well designed, used appropriate data analysis, and administered BPA by the oral route (how humans are exposed)--found no adverse reproductive effects.

None of these studies found reproductive malformations, cancer, alterations in puberty, infertility, hormonal changes or obesity, for example. While some of these studies were done in industry laboratories, others were done in government laboratories.

The lack of adverse findings in these large studies is seemingly in contrast to the many effects reported at low doses. However, these low dose effects are often not replicated and are from small studies--some of which injected BPA into a pregnant rat, injected rat pups or, in some cases, injected BPA directly into the brain or spinal cord.

It remains to be determined if any of these low dose effects can be replicated using the relevant route of exposure (oral) in a well-designed study and linked to any adverse reproductive effects.

Next Question and Answer

CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES
Evolving U.S.-China Relationship Holds Promise, Pitfalls

Breast Cancer Screenings Should Begin at Age 50, Panel Finds

GM Offers Signs of Progress, Despite $1.2 Billion Loss







ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.