The interrogation tactic known as waterboarding, or simulated drowning, has grabbed headlines in recent weeks and stirred legal and ethical debates. Malcolm Nance, a former Navy Seals instructor and Neil Livingstone, CEO of Executive Action, answered your questions on the controversial technique.
Aside from the question of whether you get reliable information from torture, hasn't it historically provoked waves of anger and hatred that virtually guarentees more bloodshed and death?
Malcolm Nance responds:
Absolutely. It has proven to be a vehicle for outrage and disgust. This is what we taught our students to understand that world disgust at any torture they would experience would lessen the torture as news filtered out. Those days may be over as a defense for our soldiers unless we turn around and renounce it at all levels and convince the world to believe us.
Neil Livingstone responds:
Mr. O'Donnell is correct that torture has provoked anger when used against the troops of a country that is a signatory to the Geneva conventions. Terrorists are not signatories nor are they recognized combatants. They kill the innocent, often in very gruesome ways; think Daniel Pearl. They have already tortured our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, thus if we use extreme forms of duress, which I am not necessarily recommending, it is unlikely to provoke any additional problems that we do not already have.