Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSTEACHER RESOURCESSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Law
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: November 14, 2007

Ask Questions on Waterboarding

Forum Introduction
Interrogation room The interrogation tactic known as waterboarding, or simulated drowning, has grabbed headlines in recent weeks and stirred legal and ethical debates. Malcolm Nance, a former Navy Seals instructor and Neil Livingstone, CEO of Executive Action, answered your questions on the controversial technique.
QUESTIONS
Hasn't torture historically provoked anger?
How should the U.S. respond if our service-members were subjected to waterboarding?
Have pop culture's depictions of torture influenced our view of it?
Isn't it better to have information even if it came from duress?
What is the difference between imitation torture and actual torture?
Have there been any studies on the efficacy of waterboarding to get information?
Why is waterboarding being employed now when we have faced greater threats in the past?
Are there any non-coercive means of gaining information?
James O'Donnell of Columbia, Mo., asks:
Aside from the question of whether you get reliable information from torture, hasn't it historically provoked waves of anger and hatred that virtually guarentees more bloodshed and death?
ANSWERS
Malcolm Nance responds:
Malcolm Nance responds:

Absolutely. It has proven to be a vehicle for outrage and disgust. This is what we taught our students to understand that world disgust at any torture they would experience would lessen the torture as news filtered out. Those days may be over as a defense for our soldiers unless we turn around and renounce it at all levels and convince the world to believe us.

Neil Livingstone responds:
Neil Livingstone responds:

Mr. O'Donnell is correct that torture has provoked anger when used against the troops of a country that is a signatory to the Geneva conventions. Terrorists are not signatories nor are they recognized combatants. They kill the innocent, often in very gruesome ways; think Daniel Pearl. They have already tortured our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, thus if we use extreme forms of duress, which I am not necessarily recommending, it is unlikely to provoke any additional problems that we do not already have.

Next Question and Answer

CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES
Holder: 9/11 Trials Will Weigh 'Crime of the Century'

Shields and Brooks Gauge 9/11 Trials, Afghan Troop Decision

Business Desk: Seven Questions for FDIC Chief Sheila Bair







ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.