Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS

Program
Support
From:
ABOUT US  |  LOCAL TV LISTINGS    EMAIL   PRINT      
PBS NewsHour
TopicsVideoRecent ProgramsTeacher ResourcesThe Rundown: news blogSubscribe rss | podcast


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Law
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: November 14, 2007

Ask Questions on Waterboarding

Forum Introduction
Interrogation room The interrogation tactic known as waterboarding, or simulated drowning, has grabbed headlines in recent weeks and stirred legal and ethical debates. Malcolm Nance, a former Navy Seals instructor and Neil Livingstone, CEO of Executive Action, answered your questions on the controversial technique.
QUESTIONS
Hasn't torture historically provoked anger?
How should the U.S. respond if our service-members were subjected to waterboarding?
Have pop culture's depictions of torture influenced our view of it?
Isn't it better to have information even if it came from duress?
What is the difference between imitation torture and actual torture?
Have there been any studies on the efficacy of waterboarding to get information?
Why is waterboarding being employed now when we have faced greater threats in the past?
Are there any non-coercive means of gaining information?
Bill Bagley of Rochester Hills, Mich., asks:
You assume the information obtained under duress could be false or misleading, but what if it isn't? Isn't it better to have a lead, or should the authorities just imprison suspects and hope for a good outcome? The use of duress is useful.
ANSWERS
Malcolm Nance responds:
Malcolm Nance responds:

The effort spent to cross check large quantities of lies could have been productively spent using non-coercive techniques. Pressure can be applied without beatings, stress positions and high intensity torture. If the terrorist of the ticking bomb intends to die, as our current opposition are so committed, torturing them, even to death just meets their objectives. Tortured people learn to become convincing liars when resisting because anything that stops the pain and suffering will be used again and again, so many confessions of zero intelligence quality are produced this way.

Neil Livingstone responds:
Neil Livingstone responds:

I agree that extreme forms of duress should not be banned in the event that the president or his designated agents, assuming full responsibility, believe that special measures are justified in an attempt to prevent a catastrophe from happening.

Next Question and Answer

CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES







The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.