|

|
CORRECTING THE CURRICULUM
What should be done to improve our students' education? March 24, 1998 |
|---|
Questions asked
in this forum:
Why are students going downhill as they enter high school? What are the pros and cons of a national curriculum? What can or what should we do to make education more relevant to our students? How important are math and science scores? Wouldn't reducing class size and teacher workloads improve the situation? Is it a question of not holding students to high enough standards or a lack of parental involvement? Are there better teaching techniques, such as Montessori? Tom Butler of St. Ann, MO asks: As a classroom teacher of 20 years and now a curriculum coordinator, I see a system that is increasingly irrelevant to students. It is not that what we teach is not useful, students just don't see the use for it immediately and thus regard it as irrelevant. What can or what should we do to make education more relevant to our students?
Marc S. Tucker, president of the National Center of Education and Economy, responds:
What our students have learned is that it is possible to go to something called college (actually a majority of the places called "college") or to get a job with only a high school diploma. In most school districts, only an eighth grade level of literacy is needed to get a high school diploma, and most students who stay in high school have that when they arrive in high school. So what is the point of taking a tough course or studying hard? Only those planning to go to a selective college have any incentive to take tough courses or work hard in high school. In other nations, most high school students work much harder because there is a point to it. One cannot get into college without passing exams that are intended to determine whether the student can actually do college level work. And, in many nations, access to good jobs requiring only a high school diploma is determined by the courses the student took, the grades that were earned, the marks on national exams and the recommendations of the student's teachers. No wonder high school is seen by these students as more relevant and they are willing to work hard in high school. They see how they do in high school as directly related to what they want for themselves when they leave high school.
Gerry Wheeler, the executive director of the National Science Teachers Association, responds:
No matter the subject, the issue of relevance is a responsibility and a challenge for every teacher. These are being met in classrooms across the country by women and men who love the subject they teach and, by their example, inspire their students to feel the same.
Science teachers invite students to explore the world around them. Involving young people actively in hands-on learning and in helping them to understand a limited number of topics that are relevant to their everyday lives makes the question "Is it relevant?" non-relevant.
The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.