|

|
JUST DOING IT?
CEO Phil Knight answers questions on Nike's new labor initiatives. May 22, 1998 |
|---|
Questions asked
in this forum:
Will Nike agree to the use of a 3rd party auditor? What is Nike's position on uninionization in their Asian factories? How do we know the incidents in the factories are not an uncommon practice of there culture? Do any other shoe manufacturers do it differently? Why are you defensive when you are supplying jobs to people? Are you providing a livable wage? Don't you think it's a little hypocritical to be making these changes now? How does your product get marked up so high? Do Nike critics have another agenda? ![]()
![]()
![]()
Terry Brennan of Beaverton ,OR: Do your critics have examples of your competitors here or elsewhere who handle subcontracted labor in a manner dramatically different than Nike? Isn't the very existence of the athletic shoe dependent on inexpensive hand labor? A Spokesperson from Nike responds:
We don't really know really know what our critics know about our subcontractors. But, we do know that Nike shoes and apparel are manufactured in better factory conditions than our competitors. Our critics claim that by targeting Nike, the entire industry will change. We disagree and point to the soccer ball industry as an example. Along with Saga Sports, our manufacturing partner in Pakistan, we set up an unique system to make soccer balls that basically changed the industry from a cottage industry with almost no control over who stitched the soccer balls together to a stitching center model in which we have great control. Two years later, the stitching centers are well lit and clean and no person under 16 years old manufactures soccer balls. Some our European competitors manufacture their soccer balls in Pakistan, but they have not changed the way they do business at all.
Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. PBS Online Privacy Policy
Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.