Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourFUNDED IN PART BYChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting2
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSNEWS FOR STUDENTSSEARCH


REGION: Middle East
TOPIC: Politics
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: April 23, 2008

Mid-East Experts Answer Questions

Forum Introduction
Hamas supporters Last Friday, former President Jimmy Carter met with Khaled Meshaal, the exiled political leader of the Palestinian organization Hamas -- the group that currently controls much of the Gaza Strip. Two experts on the Middle East answered your questions.
QUESTIONS
For Mr. Satloff: You give the impression that Hamas does not have the right to exist
For Mr. Satloff: By what right does the modern state of Israel exist?
For Mr. Perry: Why are you optimistic that Hamas will actually make compromises?
For Mr. Perry: A former president is a private citizen and should not be conducting foreign negotiations or talks.
Why has Israel not been held accountable after breaking U.N. resolutions?
What new suggestions would you make to get the conversation started between Israel and Palestine?
Do you think Hamas has credibility because it was elected by Palestinians?
Tom Cook of New Baltimore, Mich., asks Rob Satloff:
There is often mentioned the issue of recognizing Israel's "right to exist." I have not heard any explanation of where this right comes from. By what right does the modern state of Israel exist? What right does it have to take Palestinian land?
ANSWERS
Rob Satloff responds:
Rob Satloff responds:

Mr. Cook,

You ask a fascinating question - it is one that could be asked, after all, of many countries around the world, including our own, huge parts of which were taken from native peoples. The reverse question is also interesting - i.e., why does Israel care so much about the opinion of its neighbors that it puts such a premium on having the neighbors recognize its very right to existence? I think the answer to that question is connected to my answer to Mr. Podesta's question, that for Israelis, security is ultimately bound up in acceptance, not military might.

As for the particulars of your question, the United Nations in 1947 authorized the partition of the British mandated territory of Palestine into two independent states - one Jewish, one Arab. On the day the British mandate ended, the local Jewish communal leadership declared independence and five neighboring Arab states attacked. The new state, Israel, defended itself and, through the fog of war, emerged larger than its original allotted boundaries. The Arab states (Egypt and Jordan) that were in possession of the remaining portions of Palestine kept them for themselves rather than establish the independent Arab state envisioned by the United Nations. Today's diplomatic effort to create an independent Arab state in Palestine is a legacy of the decision by Arab states and the then-dominant leaders of the Palestinians to reject partition 61 years ago.

Next Question and Answer

ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: Israeli - Palestinian Conflict
RESOURCES
  Map
  Peace Efforts
  Key Players
  Archive
Mid-East Experts Answer Questions
INTERACTIVE
  Two Views of West Bank Barrier
FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
  Lesson Plan
  Prospects for peace in the
  Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
  Palestinians: Fatah vs. Hamas



  MIDDLE EAST: ISRAEL
Israel
  WORLD VIEW
WORLD VIEW







ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.