Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSTEACHER RESOURCESSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Military
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: July 25, 2007

Pilots Discuss Use of Osprey

Forum Introduction
V-22 Osprey The V-22 Osprey, an airplane that can land and take off like a helicopter, is expected to deploy to Iraq in September, although critics contend it has design flaws. Two pilots answered your questions about the aircraft.
QUESTIONS
What does the Osprey do better than other aircraft that makes it worth the cost?
How intense is the rotor downwash with respect to the expected need to swoop in and pick up ground troops?
How prevalent is "vortex ring state" in landing?
With no auto-rotation landing, what does the pilot do if both engines fail?
What happens if one engine fails?
What would the pilots do to survive a plane in vertical mode dropping like a rock?
Were helicopter problems in the past mostly due to human error?
Is it important for military operations to have one aircraft be a helicopter and airplane?
What role would the Osprey perform in Iraq?
Tom McConnel of Palo Cedro, Calif., asks:
For Jim: Helicopters have a deadly early history, but mostly it was human error. I've practiced thousands of auto-rotations in over forty years of flying and never had to perform a real one. Very few of my comrades have. Can you comment?
ANSWERS
Jim Furman responds:

I was an SIP (standardization instructor pilot) and an IP (instructor pilot) in helicopters. I, like you, practiced thousands of auto-rotations to touch down. I never had a complete engine failure either. Modern gas turbine engines are very reliable. However, it has happened. Enough so that every civilian helicopter and every military helicopter, before the Osprey, had to demonstrate an auto-rotative capability. The original specifications for the Osprey also required an auto-rotational capability. This requirement was waived when the Navy determined that it could not auto-rotate. The FAA and the military services maintain records on complete engine out auto-rotational events. It is more than a statistical anomaly. To certify a civilian helicopter, the FAA requires that the manufacturer demonstrate that the helicopters can auto-rotate. Even though you have never had to do a real one, I am pretty sure that you would not fly one of your helicopters if the "free wheeling" unit (this is what disengages the rotors from the engine in the event of an engine failure) was not working.

Next Question and Answer

CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES
Evolving U.S.-China Relationship Holds Promise, Pitfalls

Breast Cancer Screenings Should Begin at Age 50, Panel Finds

GM Offers Signs of Progress, Despite $1.2 Billion Loss







ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.