Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Program
Support
From:
ABOUT US  |  LOCAL TV LISTINGS    E-MAIL   PRINT      
PBS NewsHour
TopicsVideoRecent ProgramsTeacher ResourcesThe Rundown: news blogSubscribe rss | podcast


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Politics
Online NewsHour
FORUM
Posted: October 16, 2007

Authors Debate Israeli Lobby's Role

Forum Introduction
Condoleezza Rice and Ehud Olmert Abraham Foxman, Director of the Anti-Defamation League and author of "The Deadliest Lies" and John Mearsheimer, a professor at the University of Chicago and co-author of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" answered your questions on the influence of the Israeli lobby in the United States.
QUESTIONS
What if the Palestinian Authority renounced claims on Jerusalem?
Why is any criticism of Israel a criticism of the Jewish people?
Isn't it the fault of the American system if the Israel lobby has too much influence?
Would the US have voted differently in the United Nations if not for Israel?
Do the views of the Jewish leaders reflect that of the Jewish people?
Why should the US pay $3 billion a year to Israel it has a high standard of living?
Tim Archer of Bend, Ore., asks:
Why does it seem that any criticism of Israel and the United States' policies toward Israel is seen as criticism of Jewish people and not that of a country's policies?
ANSWERS
Abraham Foxman responds:
Abraham Foxman responds:

It is not true that I or other leaders in the Jewish community see any criticism of Israel as anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic.

Israel, like any other country, has good policies and bad and is subject to legitimate criticism. I may agree or disagree with such criticisms, but there is nothing anti-Jewish about them.

It is another thing when the criticisms of Israel go beyond the normal. Sometimes it takes the form of using anti-Semitic images such as accusing Israel of drinking the blood of Palestinians (which is the classic blood libel against Jews) or comparing Israeli behavior to the crucifixion of Jesus or saying the Israelis are worse that the Nazis. All of these suggest a form of criticism that is reminiscent of classic anti-Semitism.

In addition, when Israel is not merely criticized for a particular practice or policy but is deemed as a unique violator of human rights while the far greater violators in the Middle East, countries like Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran and others are ignored, something is at work that is not simply legitimate criticism.

And, if comments are made suggesting that Israel has not right to exist, that too suggests an anti-Jewish component.

So to be clear: everyday there are comments in the Israeli press and around the world raising questions about certain Israeli policies. No one says that is anti-Jewish. Anti-Semitism comes into play when we are talking about something very different.

John Mearsheimer responds:
John Mearsheimer responds:

Many defenders of Israel label anyone who criticizes Israel as an anti-Semite because it has been a very effective weapon for marginalizing and silencing critics of Israeli policy and the U.S.-Israeli relationship. No respectable person wants to be called an anti-Semite, as it is an odious label that can damage both a person's career and his or her personal life. Thus, many people who would otherwise criticize Israel or talk about the lobby's influence on U.S. Middle East policy remain silent.

Next Question and Answer

CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES







The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.