Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Forum
Online NewsHour
THE LAST STAND

November 24, 1998 
Back from the Brink

The IMF put together a $41.5 billion deal to help Brazil defend its economy against the spreading global economic crisis. Asia's and Russia's economies have already been crippled. Will the IMF plan work this time?

Return to this forum's introduction.

IMF/Brazil RealAudio report


Outside Links


Will the IMF plan cause a recession in Brazil?

Can the IMF restrict the way bailout funds are distributed?

Is Brazil's economic problems due to graft?

How many years will it take for Brazil to recover?

Does this plan deal with the "moral hazard" associated with international bailouts?

Viewer Comments

 

 

NewsHour Links


November 13, 1998: A detailed look at the IMF/Brazil deal.

October 27, 1998: A look at Russia's collapsing economy.

October 20, 1998: The global economic crisis is hurting U.S. companies.

October 15, 1998: The Federal Reserve cuts interest rates to fend of an economic downturn.

October 9, 1998: A discussion of the global economic crisis.

Browse the NewsHour's coverage of economic issues.

 

 

Marcus Anthony Baptista of Natick, MA, asks:

Assuming unemployment will begin to rise even more so, how many years will it take for the economy in Brazil to begin to pick up again in order for there to be less immigration to the U.S. as an option for improved living conditions?

Steven Radelet of the Harvard Institute for International Development responds:

The IMF's program in Brazil assumes that the economy will shrink by 1% in 1999 and then rebound to grow 3-4% in the following two years. This seems very optimistic, considering the program's focus on defending the exchange rate with high interest rates and sharp budget cuts. It is worth noting that at every stage of the crisis in Asia, the IMF dramatically overestimated the potential for a rapid return to growth. For example, in Korea, the IMF initially estimated that growth in 1998 would be 2.5%, whereas the actual turnout will be closer to -7%. In Mexico, following the peso crisis of late 1994, output fell 7% in 1995 before rebounding in 1996, and Mexico was buoyed by $23 billion in loans from the international community (not promises for funds, as in most of Asia, but actual delivery of funds early in the program) and a robust U.S. economy next door. Brazil may avoid a deep recession under the current program, but only through the support of generous international loans. A more growth-oriented approach that included lower interest rates, a modest exchange rate depreciation, and debt restructuring would not only moderate the immediate recession, but would help lay a stronger foundation for more sustained economic growth after the crisis passes. Improving living conditions sufficiently to slow immigration flows is a much longer term process, as with Mexico. Brazil has made remarkable progress during the last decade by implementing wide-ranging reforms including the liberalization of foreign trade and investment rules, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and a strengthening of the financial sector. With appropriate macroeconomic and exchange rate policies, careful strengthening of financial systems, and a focus on integrating its manufacturing firms with the global trading system, Brazil has the potential to grow rapidly during the next decade and raise standards of living for a broader segment of the population.

Mary Bush, former IMF executive board member, responds:

For several years, Brazil has been engaged in a program of fairly aggressively opening its markets to foreign trade, privatizing large enterprises and bringing down inflation. It has also been benefiting from large flows of foreign direct investment; it increased from approximately $2 billion in 1994 to more than $20 billion in 1998. Brazil is also undertaking some simplification of its tax system specifically the VAT. On the other hand, this new adjustment program increases the corporate turnover tax. That could be a problem for growth and I believe should be reconsidered.

Although unemployment has risen, the breadth of adjustments just mentioned, coupled with reduction of public sector spending and deficits, should give a boost to the economy sooner rather than later. In view of these factors, I do not believe that levels of immigration to the United States will be a problem.

Continue

 

    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.