|
"Your deeds, Mr. President -- neglecting the needy to coddle
the rich, desecrating the environment and misleading the country
into war -- do not exemplify the faith we live by," stated
a letter of protest signed by over 800 students, faculty members
and alumni at the conservative Christian Calvin College in Grand
Rapids, Mich., objecting to the commencement address given by
President Bush in May 2005.
Twenty-two-year-old biology major Nathan Haan was a junior when
the protests erupted on his campus. As the co-chairman of Calvin's
Environmental Stewardship Coalition, Haan felt strongly that the
president was not living up to his responsibilities as an evangelical
Christian.
"The two primary tenants of the Christian faith are to care
for the poor, and to care for the earth. The Bush administration
wasn't doing a good job on either" Haan said.
Although
few Christian leaders today would disagree that charity and stewardship
are important religious values, the question of priority is another
issue. According to Paul Froese, a sociologist of religion at
Baylor University, such disagreements are threatening to divide
the Bush administration's evangelical base.
"There is tremendous strife within evangelical groups in
terms of what issues should be collectively prioritized,"
Froese said. "I've been to evangelical conferences where
the speaker insists that poverty is all evangelicals should care
about, and I've seen some in the congregation nod their heads
in agreement, while other members of the audience walk out in
protest."
And according to data provided by the religious research and
advocacy organization, The Barna Group, it may be young evangelicals
who are leading this challenge to the current conservative politics
of their religious elders.
Not only are they more liberal on several of the hot button issues
currently driving conservative politics, many evangelicals in
Generation Next want to change the conversation all together,
putting traditionally left-leaning concerns such as the environment
and social justice to the forefront of the evangelical movement.
Cooling hot-button issues
According to experts, there is a notable generational difference
at play between how younger and older evangelicals approach the
controversial issues of abortion or gay marriage. For Froese,
the reason is simple: exposure.
"I've been to so many churches where a preacher will say
something about homosexuality, and all these young people will
get upset about it," said Brandon Rhodes, a 22-year-old evangelical
from Portland, Ore. "We have a much more nuanced and compassionate
view. When your sister or your friend is out of the closet, you
can't just say, 'Oh you sinner.'"
According to "The New Gay Teenager," a book published
by Harvard University Press last year, the average gay person
now comes out just before or after graduating high school.
The chances of a young evangelical making it through their teens
or their early 20s without befriending someone of a different
religious background or sexual orientation are getting remarkably
small -- and, experts agree, this new reality is beginning to
change a generation's approach to these issues.
According to preliminary studies by The Barna Group, 18-29-year-old,
born-again Christians are some 15 percent more likely to find
homosexuality morally acceptable than their religious elders.
Further, less than half of them favor a constitutional amendment
banning gay marriage.
"They care about losing marriage, but they aren't going
to scapegoat gays and lesbians for the breakdown of the American
family," explained Jim Wallis, left-leaning Evangelical leader
and author of "God's Politics."
According to research by The Barna Group, born-again Christians
actually have a higher divorce rate than non-born-again Christians,
and this reality has influenced a generation's view on the problems
facing marriage today, said Wallis.
"They know from experience that divorce is the far deeper
cause of the breakdown, and they are frustrated that their leaders
aren't speaking out against it. Young people have gay friends,
and that proximity brings compassion and understanding,"
Wallis said.
Although young evangelicals generally oppose abortion rights,
their views on the issue are often similarly nuanced. Nick Price,
a 22 year old who lives in Chicago, believes that better health
care, rather than criminalization, should be the Christian response
to the problem of abortion.
"I would love to see a government that makes abortion obsolete,"
Price said. "Criminalizing abortion doesn't get to the heart
of the matter. Instead we need public policies that support women
and children."
Rhodes, the young evangelical from Portland, agreed. "We
are becoming politically ambidextrous," he said, referencing
a quote by Christian activist Brian Mclaren. "We'll be pro-life,
but we'll be pro-circle-of-life as well. ... After all, family
values means taking care of future generations."
For Rhodes, this concern for the future has turned into a mission
to turn the attention of his evangelical peers away from such
issues and toward the problems of social and environmental injustice.
"If you love the Creator, take care of creation"
In November, a few dozen young religious leaders from around
the country descended on Washington, D.C. to present the federal
government with a statement on global warming signed by over 1,250
evangelical college students. Brandon Rhodes was part of this
Evangelical Youth Climate Initiative.
"We want politicians to know that the next generation of
Christians considers dealing with climate change to be a moral
and biblical mandate," Rhodes said.
"We'd like to speak with [incoming House] Speaker [Nancy]
Pelosi, and I think she might
let us in.
But I don't know about George [Bush]."
According to preliminary data from the 2006 Baylor Survey on
Religion, over 80 percent of 18-25-year-old white evangelicals
believe that the federal government should do more to protect
the environment.
For Peter Illyn, founder and president of the nonprofit group
Restoring Eden, this position emerges naturally from a post-modern
world view that worries about the environmental costs of contemporary
living.
"Environmental stewardship resonates very strongly with
this generation. It goes hand-in-hand with their faith. Removing
it seems artificial," Illyn noted.
The struggle ahead, Illyn said, is not in convincing young people
to recognize the environmental problems we are facing, but rather
to persuade their religious elders that it's an issue worth prioritizing.
"I really believe that this is not just a fad or a phase.
I honestly think that there are enough of them that they are going
to change the conversation significantly."
Bucking the status quo
For many young evangelicals, the complex realities of poverty
and disease often lead them to challenge -- if not repudiate --
the moral conservatism of their religious elders.
According to Nick Price, evangelicals have a special calling
to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic both in the United States and
abroad. From his point of view, that call is not exclusively for
abstinence-only education.
"People are dying, we have to deal with that issue first.
Teaching about condom use is necessary, and it definitely helps,"
Price said. "If you want to argue about it, go to your own
corner and argue. But don't get in the way of those of us trying
to stop this disease."
Amy Jonason, 20-year-old co-chairwoman of Calvin College's Social
Justice Committee, agreed.
"Having a personal relationship with God mandates a critical
engagement with the world. Where we choose to live, what we choose
to buy and how we tend to vote are all things we should be thinking
about as Christians," Jonason said.
Global poverty has been the central focus of her student committee,
with an emphasis on fair trade and labor practices. Her group
also educates the student community about the genocides in Darfur
and northern Uganda, and raises money for Christian world hunger
relief organizations.
Although some of her more conservative peers accuse her group
of trying to convert students to the Democratic Party, such liberal
opinions among young evangelicals are
more common than many people assume.
For instance, the 2006 Baylor Survey on religion found that approximately
60 percent of young people affiliated with an evangelical church
believe that the federal government should work to redistribute
wealth more evenly. An equal percentage also agreed that the government
should regulate business practices more closely.
Taking "liberal" stances on the issues of poverty or
the degradation of the environment, however, is a distant cry
from actually voting that way. It is this discrepancy that leaves
open the question: Just what political impact will young left-leaning
evangelicals to have?
Will they mobilize?
Young evangelicals, like many of their elders, are looking to
politics and the government as a way to implement their religious
beliefs. According to the Baylor study, nearly 70 percent of them
believe that the federal government should advocate and defend
Christian values.
Although the Republican Party lost votes across all age brackets
in November, it was the youngest voters who registered the most
dramatic shift to the left. According to the Pew Research Center,
support for Democratic candidates jumped from 16 percent to 26
percent for 18-29-year-old white evangelicals between the 2004
and 2006 elections.
Yet, thus far, social justice or environmental concerns aren't
driving voting patters, according to sociologist Paul Froese.
Nathan Haan, the student from Calvin College, isn't convinced
that this is going to change anytime soon.
"It is something that worries me," Haan admitted. "I
don't think that care for the environment is going to trump abortion
for mainstream evangelicals."
Brandon Rhodes from Portland, however, remains hopeful -- and
angry. "The pro-life platform is total lip-service from the
Republicans. Evangelicals are starting to realize this, and that
should scare the hell out of every Republican in office."
-- By Venessa Mendenhall, Generation
Next
|