|
| COMPARING PATIENTS' RIGHTS | |
|
A comparison of two Senate bills that promote increased rights for patients enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs). |
|
|
S 872 |
S 889 Sponsored By: John Breaux (D-La.) Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-Vt.) |
||
| Supported by |
Most Democrats, some Republicans President Bush has threatened veto |
Some Republicans, Conservative Democrats, President Bush | ||
| Right to Sue in Federal Court | Patients could sue, without limit, over non-medical issues like benefits, contracts and co-payments. Damages for "willful and wanton" misconduct would be capped at $5 million. | Patients could sue for an unlimited amount of economic damages and a limit of $500,000 for noneconomic damages. Punitive damages not allowed. | ||
| Right to Sue in State Courts | Patients could sue in state court over denial of coverage. States can set limits. State courts are thought to be easier to access, and often grant larger awards to defendents. | Patients could sue in state courts if plan was found to be medically negligent. | ||
| Emergency Room Care | Patients could go to the nearest hospital emergency room. | |||
| Specialists | Women could see an obstetrician-gynecologist in their health plan without a referral or pre-authorization. Children could select a pediatrician in their plan as their primary care provider. | |||
| |||||
|
|||||
| |||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | |||||