Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS

a NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript
Online NewsHour Online Focus
COMPARING PATIENTS' RIGHTS

Patients Rights A comparison of two Senate bills that promote increased rights for patients enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

 

 

S 872
Sponsored By:
Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.)
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.)
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)

S 889
Sponsored By:
John Breaux (D-La.)
Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.)
Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-Vt.)
Supported by

Most Democrats, some Republicans

President Bush has threatened veto

Some Republicans, Conservative Democrats, President Bush
Right to Sue in Federal Court Patients could sue, without limit, over non-medical issues like benefits, contracts and co-payments. Damages for "willful and wanton" misconduct would be capped at $5 million. Patients could sue for an unlimited amount of economic damages and a limit of $500,000 for noneconomic damages. Punitive damages not allowed.
Right to Sue in State Courts Patients could sue in state court over denial of coverage. States can set limits. State courts are thought to be easier to access, and often grant larger awards to defendents. Patients could sue in state courts if plan was found to be medically negligent.
Emergency Room Care Patients could go to the nearest hospital emergency room.
Specialists Women could see an obstetrician-gynecologist in their health plan without a referral or pre-authorization. Children could select a pediatrician in their plan as their primary care provider.

The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.