Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS

Program
Support
From:
ABOUT US  |  LOCAL TV LISTINGS    EMAIL   PRINT      
PBS NewsHour
TopicsVideoRecent ProgramsTeacher ResourcesThe Rundown: news blogSubscribe rss | podcast


REGION: Asia-Pacific
TOPIC: Military
Online NewsHour
IN-DEPTH COVERAGE
North Korea: Nuclear Standoff
BACKGROUND REPORTUpdated: October 19, 2006     
North Korea's Nuclear Program

North Korea's role as a center for nuclear development commenced even before the official creation of the state. During the Second World War, Japanese officials reportedly based their efforts to develop an atomic weapon in a region that, after the war ended, would be within Soviet-occupied North Korea.

The region had a natural draw as a development site: geologic deposits of some 26 million tons of uranium, the elemental key to the atomic lock. After the Soviets and Americans divided the Korean peninsula along the 38th parallel -- a move that was supposed to be temporary but eventually led to the development of the two Korean states -- the Soviet Union began exporting uranium out of the area. Shipments reportedly topped 9,000 tons between 1947 and 1950.

U.S. President Harry Truman and U.S. Army General Douglas MacArthur meet on Wake Island during the Korean War.Then in 1950, the North Korean army poured across the 38th parallel into the South. At several points during the ensuing three-year war, the U.S. military considered using atomic weapons. According to historian Bruce Cumings, Gen. Douglas MacArthur told the Department of Defense that he saw "a unique use of the atomic bomb" to strike a "blocking blow" should China enter the war.

President Harry Truman also said in Nov. 1950 that, "There has always been active consideration of its [atomic bomb's] use." In the midst of the war, Kim Il Sung's government formed the Atomic Energy Research Institute to develop use of radioactivity in industry, medicine and agriculture.

A continuation of nuclear research
After the war ended, North Korea continued its nuclear efforts, beginning to train nuclear engineers and scientists in the Soviet Union. Their work focused on the development of the United Institute for Nuclear Research in the Russian city of Dubna. The center served as the international nuclear research laboratory for all communist nations.

During the 1960s and 70s, Russian scientists instructed the North Koreans on plutonium-processing methods. The work culminated in the construction of the Yongbyon Nuclear Research Complex, 60 miles north of the capital Pyongyang, in 1961-62. By 1963 the first Soviet-supplied research reactor was under construction at the site.

Research continued for nearly two decades before the efforts came to fruition. According to the Congressional Research Service, the first major atomic reactor at Yongbyon was built between 1980 and 1987. This 50-electrical megawatt reactor is reportedly capable of producing enough plutonium each year to build a single atomic weapon.

Yongbyon nuclear facility, North Korea, satellite photo, August 2002, Source: Space ImagingThe site at Yongbyon remains at the heart of North Korea's nuclear effort, also housing two significantly larger reactors onsite that have been under construction since 1984, according to former U.S. Ambassador Robert Gallucci. If completed, these sites could produce enough fissile material for some 30 atomic bombs per year.

The site also has a large plutonium processing plant. The 600-foot-long multi-story building reportedly houses the refining machinery to take reactor uranium rods and generate weapons-grade plutonium, with North Korean scientists applying training received in Soviet-era nuclear facilities.

A CRS report on the site disputed North Korea's claims that Yongbyon's main goal is electricity generation.

"Satellite photographs," Larry Niksch wrote in a Jan. 7, 2003 paper, "reportedly also show that the atomic reactors have no attached power lines, which they would have if used for electrical power generation."

By 1990, the KGB reported to the Soviet Central Committee that "development of the first nuclear device has been completed at the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea — North Korea] nuclear research center in Yongbyon." The report went on to say the North Korean government would not test the device in order to avoid international detection.

Within a year, the Bush administration made several diplomatic overtures in the hopes of bringing North Korea into line with the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT) Kim IL Sung's government had agreed to in 1985.

North Korean (in blue) and South Korean workers (in white), involved in Light Water Reactor Project by Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, Kumho, northeastern North Korea, August 2002First, the U.S. removed its nuclear weapons from South Korea in late 1991. It then urged North Korea to agree to two pacts, one a denuclearization agreement with the South, the other a so-called "safeguards agreement" with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The deal with the IAEA, which required North Korea to report all nuclear programs and make those facilities open to international monitoring, led to a series of six inspections between June 1992 and Feb. 1993.

Within months of starting the inspections, IAEA officials found evidence indicating North Korea had not fully accounted for its nuclear stockpiles. This prompted the United Nations nuclear watchdog to invoke a special inspection protocol to survey two concealed nuclear waste sites at the Yongbyon complex. North Korea rejected the IAEA request in March 1993 and promptly announced its intention to pull out of the NPT.

In 2002, President Clinton acknowledged that in the midst of this 1993-1994 standoff, the president considered a plan to bomb the Yongbyon complex. Whatever was considered, President Clinton instead responded with a diplomatic offer of high-level negotiations, a move that caused North Korea to suspend its planned departure from the proliferation treaty.

The Agreed Framework and uranium processing
After extended negotiation, North Korea and the United States entered into the "Agreed Framework" on Oct. 21, 1994. Under the deal, North Korea would suspend all work at the Yongbyon complex, end all efforts to enrich plutonium for weapons and open its facilities to international oversight. In exchange for these moves, the U.S. would supply North Korea with two light water reactors (LWRs) to generate electricity, and low-cost oil to help with energy needs until the reactors were built. The agreement also promised a lifting of most economic sanctions against North Korea, and improved diplomatic relations with the United States.

A crane lowers a bucket containing concrete into the foundation of a reactor during the first concrete pouring for the Light Water Reactor Project by Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, Kumho, northeastern North Korea, August 2002The main goal in offering North Korea LWRs was to eliminate the output of plutonium that could be used for weapons.

Although the sanctions against North Korea were largely lifted and oil deliveries began in early 1995, the development of the LWRs became more complex. The U.S., South Korea, Japan and several other countries came together to form the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) to build the reactors. KEDO soon pushed back the deadline for completing the reactors from 2003 to 2007. Bureaucratic wrangling over contracts and the establishment of KEDO slowed the process even more so that the foundations for the two reactors were not poured until August 2002.

Even as the nations were debating implementation of the Agreed Framework, North Korea, the United States argued, was breaking the spirit, if not the letter, of the pact. Within months of signing the framework, North Korea and Pakistan reportedly cut a deal to trade missile technology for Pakistan's uranium enrichment techniques — the Agreed Framework had banned plutonium enrichment programs.

For more than three years, the North Koreans worked quietly on their uranium project while urging the United States to fully implement the Agreed Framework. The Clinton administration apparently learned of the secret program in late 1998 or early 1999, and by March 2000, President Clinton informed Congress he could no longer certify that "North Korea is not seeking to develop or acquire the capability to enrich uranium."

Heightened tensions in the peninsula
Over the next two years, the United States continued to compile evidence on North Korea's uranium project. It was this evidence that prompted President Bush to label the Kim Jong Il government part of the "axis of evil" in his 2002 State of the Union address.

President Bush delivers the 2002 State of the Union Address"Some of these regimes have been pretty quiet since September 11th. But we know their true nature. North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens," the president said.

"States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger," Mr. Bush added. "They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic."

In October 2002, Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly confronted officials in Pyongyang with U.S. evidence of the uranium project. North Korea admitted it was pursuing the program, and in December 2002 the Central Intelligence Agency reported North Korea could develop an atomic weapon by 2004.

North Korea said it would continue the program unless the United States agreed to enter into bilateral talks to draft a nonaggression pact. The United States has rejected all calls for such an agreement since it does not include South Korea and could compromise the South's future security.

In December 2002, KEDO moved to cut off the supply of fuel oil to North Korea, citing the North's violation of the Agreed Framework.

In a quick and surprising response, North Korea moved to restart the nuclear facilities at Yongbyon that were shut down under the Agreed Framework. It also expelled officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency and resumed construction of two large reactors that were frozen under the agreement.

Spent nuclear fuel rods in a cooling pond, Yongbyon, North Korea, June 15, 1996

After the Agreed Framework crumbled, North Korea also followed through with threats to withdraw from the NPT in January 2003, releasing it from the obligation to follow international law. By February, the official Korean Central News Agency, or KCNA, claimed that it had restarted its nuclear power facilities.

This reactivation of the Yongbyon complex, coupled with the uncertain status of the uranium enrichment facility, left North Korea with a fully mobilized nuclear research and potential weapons development center. These reactors also increased the potential atomic weapons output five- to eight-fold, meaning Kim Jong Il's government could produce more than a dozen atomic bombs a year.

Facing this threat, the United States, South Korea, China, Japan and Russia opened six-party talks with North Korea in an attempt to draw Kim Jong IL's government back into diplomatic negotiations. The talks began in August 2003 and aimed to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program. In February 2005, with little headway made, North Korea admitted for the first time to possessing nuclear weapons. The admission was not verified by outside governments and without a nuclear test, North Korea could not prove these claims.

Further admissions came in June 2005 when North Korea said it had a stockpile of nuclear weapons and was in the process of building more -- even as the six-party talks continued. Negotiations came to a halt in November 2005 over a dispute with the United States concerning sanctions against North Korea.

On July 5, 2006, North Korea fired six ballistic missiles, one of which, the Taepondong-2, was thought to have the capability to reach the western United States and carry a nuclear weapon. Though the Taepondong-2 failed after 40 seconds, the other, short-range missiles, fired successfully. A U.N. Security Council Resolution condemned the move and demanded that North Korea suspend its ballistic missile program.

Confirmation of the existence of completed nuclear weapons remained uncertain without a test. A statement by the KCNA in early October said, "The U.S. extreme threat of a nuclear war and sanctions and pressure compel the DPRK to conduct a nuclear test, an essential process for bolstering nuclear deterrent, as a corresponding measure for defense."

On Oct. 9, 2006, the KCNA announced that it had successfully conducted an underground nuclear test that will "contribute to defending the peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the area around it."

The test was immediately denounced by the international community and it refocused attention on the country's nuclear program, especially U.S. concerns that North Korea would share nuclear information with other countries.

A unanimous Security Council vote condemned the test and imposed sanctions aimed at restraining its nuclear weapons program. The move prompted North Korea's ambassador to the U.N. Pak Gil Yon to walk out of the Security Council chambers. The resolution called the test "a clear threat to international peace and security."


-- Compiled by Lee Banville for the Online NewsHour

ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: North Korea: Nuclear Standoff
REPORTS
  U.S. Relations
  Nuclear Program
  The Demilitarized Zone
  Profiles
  Kim Jong Il
  Kim Il Sung
RESOURCES
  Historical Overview
  Archive
INTERACTIVE
  Map
FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
  Lesson Plan
  Why is North Korea Going it Alone?
REGIONAL LOOK
Map of North Korea
ALSO ON THE NEWSHOUR
Tracking Nuclear Proliferation
Reports on efforts to limit the spread of nuclear weapons technology
The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.