|
|
NEWSHOUR: The Clarion-Ledger was such a divisive
force in Jackson for so long. What were your feelings walking in here
today to address the editorial board here?
MYRLIE EVERS-WILLIAMS: I had a very good feeling about it, actually.
Somewhat amused in a very positive way that I was here to address the
editorial board, knowing full well that some years ago no one would
have considered that a possibility. I have watched the growth of --
and I call it growth -- of this paper from years past and I certainly
hope and trust that the reporting will continue in a vein where it's
open and it's fair and that it's inclusive. Looking at the members of
the editorial board and just seeing the different groups represented
here was also a very good feeling.
If I go back, years ago, remembering this newspaper and a couple of
others in the state, there's such a major contrast. I remember so well,
an editorial on the first page of this paper that called for and said
that blood would flow in the streets if we continued to pursue equality
and justice in this state. It's completely different in terms of that.
So, as I walked in, I really had flashbacks to those things that we
had such difficulty with in the '50s and the '60s.
None of the news of what my people were doing in our community was available
to us. Eventually there was a little throw section that spoke specifically
to the, as we knew it then, the Negro community. But when you find a
publication that is widely read calling for threats against people who
happen to be the underdog at that time, it's just not right. And we
had no say-so, we had no voice in it.
One
of the editorial cartoons that I just recently saw from this newspaper
had in it a large volume, a book, that said "Mississippi's human
relations", or something to that fact, as though the State of Mississippi
had [made strides] in that. But on the top of that book was a pool of
blood, that had my late husband's name on it -- Medgar Evers. One had
the feeling that the editorial was saying of all the good works that
Mississippi has done, here's this bloodstain on it that says we really
shouldn't have done that, it's a shame here in Mississippi. But what
good body of work had the state really done?
After Medgar's death, almost immediately, things began to change. And
as I tell young people that I speak to, it was a significant change,
but those things were so minute. For instance, almost immediately, we
had school crossing guards. Can you envision a group of people protesting,
trying to get school crossing guards? I mean, that we take for granted
today? It's no problem whatsoever.
Shortly thereafter, a few policemen were hired who happen to have been
black, but they were restricted to their own neighborhoods. Regardless
of what crime they witness, if those who were perpetrating the crime
were Caucasian, they couldn't arrest them. Just one change after another.
Medgar often said we live behind the cotton curtain as far as the media
was concerned. At that time, without email and all of those good things
that we have now, we relied upon Western Union to get the information
in terms of murders and -- I might as well just call them what they
were -- lynchings and other disturbances out to the media beyond the
cotton curtain of Mississippi. I just feel very fortunate that I've
lived this long to see the changes and I realize, too, that, you know,
there's still work to be done. But at least people, for the most part,
seem to be open to that.
|
 |
|
NEWSHOUR: You were speaking before in the board meeting about how profoundly
pleasing it was to come back here and see how it's changed. How do those
old front-page editorials strike you now?
MYRLIE
EVERS-WILLIAMS: They strike me in a historical -- in a very strong historical
sense now. That's what it was then. Where are we now and what must we
do to keep things from ever going back to that point in our history.
However, then in '63, one was not shocked by that; by the viciousness
of the headlines; by the unfair reporting of what was happening for
inciting people to violence. And that's really what happened.
We in the black community -- and as I said, we were then called Negroes
-- we were not shocked at all by that. We hoped that one day it would
change. We also thought and worked very hard to raise funds to have
our own newspaper where we could have a voice. And in some sense that
did happen. I look now, today, at the newspapers, the magazines, the
television stations that we, as a people own and we have the ability
to tell our own story.
I just hope to see much more of it. I would love to see a major movie
studio, television studio. Well, we have television studios here in
Jackson that are managed and owned by African-Americans. But I'd love
to see a major movie studio where we could portray the likeness of our
people in a manner in which we think would be fair and right to do so.
|
|
|
NEWSHOUR: Tell me more about The Clarion-Ledger's effort
in leading the charge, in many ways, to open these old cases and [investigative
reporter] Jerry Mitchell's role in the paper's efforts.
MYRLIE EVERS-WILLIAMS: Jerry Mitchell has become a very dear friend
of mine. Through lots of hard work, his investigative expertise and
in helping us have the ammunition to have a third murder trial in Medgar's
case where there was a guilty verdict. That was something I had worked
on in my own way for years looking for information hoping that something
would come up where there could be a third trial. And eventually that
did happen.
I know the third trial, along with the work of The Clarion-Ledger,
led by Jerry said a thousand words to the national public as a whole.
That even though these murders, these lynchings, these assassinations
took place years ago, there's still time to right those wrongs. That
there is still information out there that can justify reopening these
cases and going on to a third trial. That is something I feel so very,
very good about.
And
I will not be modest here at all. I know that it was the Medgar Evers
trial, the third trial with a guilty verdict, that gave others a sense
that, perhaps, justice could be done in their case as well. I don't
believe that Jerry Mitchell always had an easy time in writing, getting
his articles approved. I suspect there was some discussion about that.
But it's something that speaks to his perseverance and to mine. And
to a fairness now in journalism that we find with The Clarion-Ledger.
I do believe that this newspaper has received awards for the role that
they played in fair reporting.
Looking at the members of the editorial board was very satisfying today.
Because it is a board that's inclusive. We never would have thought
that would have ever been possible some years ago. Perhaps it sounds
as though I'm singing the praises of the paper. I am singing the praise
of Jerry Mitchell and, perhaps, the newspaper for the distance in which
it has come. Because it's truly a leader in that sense from other newspapers
here in the state and others, particularly in the South, who still have
not met the openness, the fairness of reporting that this newspaper
has.
But I also happen to be a realist and I know that you cannot always
count on progress once you've seen some indication of it. You have to
continually be aware of the need to apply a little pressure to do better.
And without that there's always a chance of slipping back into some
of the same practices as we had in the past.
NEWSHOUR: Do you think that third trial would have come about without
the work of the paper?
MYRLIE EVERS-WILLIAMS: I certainly think that the possibility of the
third trial was enhanced by the paper. If I can be more specific, I
believe that the third trial was made possible by Jerry Mitchell persevering,
working, trying to change some concepts within the paper; of being strong
enough to meet the challenges from within and from without.
I also believe that the third trial came about because of a young assistant
district attorney, Bobby DeLaughter, who put himself out on the line.
And, not to be modest, I certainly think that the third trial came about
because I persevered over the years when I was told that I was being
very foolish to expect a third trial and, certainly, very foolish to
expect a conviction.
So at this point, I think it was the three of us and the paper came
along with it because it was a good thing to do. It was the expedient
thing to do because the media around the country and the world covered
this and they couldn't be left with everyone else covering [something
that was] happening right here. I also believe that finally the knowledge
of and respect of being a social conscience for the people in the state
of Mississippi kicked in and social responsibility became something
that this newspaper embraced.
|
|
|
NEWSHOUR: What do you think it's done for a paper in the city of Jackson,
and for the State of Mississippi as a whole, to bring these cases up?
MYRLIE
EVERS-WILLIAMS: I think it's a bold step for this publication to move
in the direction in which they have moved.
It's also critically
important that the public, through letters to the editor and other ways
keep the publication on the right path on which it's going.
I have certainly come across the attitude that all of the things that
happened in the '60s, the '50, the '40s, that's in the past, let it
stay there. Why bring it up again today? And those who feel strongly
about that to those who say, well, let's move forward with all force,
to those who don't care one way or the other. I speak from experience
of that in terms of what happened when we were involved with the third
murder trial. And the reporters went around in the vicinity of Jackson
and asked a similar question. Do you think that this trial should be
held? Should the case be reopened?
I was horrified when one of the persons interviewed, a young woman who
appeared to be not much more than 18 years of age said "I don't
know why she" meaning me, "would want to bring all of that
up again. The man is old, that's in the past we don't need to bother
with that." And I thought
you're the very person I want
to target to educate, because you're too young to know what happened
then, but you can't see the benefit of that knowledge and transferring
it into some kind of positive action for today, regardless of what we
are discussing. And that was the end of that story.
But, regardless of what it is that we are discussing, we're going to
always find, I think, those three components there. Those people who
say, wash it away, it's in the past, it's not relevant to today, to
those in the middle who could care less one way or the other, to those
to the other extreme who say let's go forward and do the best we can.
So, that's normal. I would hope that the percentage of people who are
positive about moving forward is much higher than those who are not.
NEWSHOUR: We were talking in the editorial board meeting about reconciliation
in Mississippi and in the United States, as a whole. What do you think
the paper's role has been in that transformation, both within Jackson
and the country?
MYRLIE
EVERS-WILLIAMS: Well, I know that the changes that have taken place,
editorially and otherwise, with this paper have played a very, very
important role in helping the population move forward. Move forward
in terms of race relations, in particular.
You know there was a time when my people were not given the courtesy
of a title. We were all boy, girl, James or Annie, regardless of our
names. I recall the time when we were not allowed to try on clothes,
shoes. Those were things that were talked about as being positive at
the time with the newspaper. There were no complaints about that. That
is correct because they belong in their place and that is their place.
The media determines to a great degree how the overall public sees anyone
and any issue. They have to set the tone.
The admiration of the Citizens' Council -- you know, they were praised
in the newspaper. We now know that that was a vicious organization that
set up many people for surveillance, incorrect reports on them. All
geared toward one thing, violence if need be to keep a certain group
of people down. That's changed with many people having paid a supreme
price to see that that was changed.
I recall at the end of Medgar's funeral here in Jackson -- and there
were reporters from around the world to cover that event. People broke
into this emotional trot and then a race through town and they all cried
out in unison one time after another "after Medgar, no more fear,
after Medgar no more fear." And it was a turning point where people
began to demand that there be changes in the media coverage. Changes
with jobs, changes with the way we were treated in the terms of our
dignity and whatnot. In a way it was forced upon these institutions
to make those changes.
They did not go quietly into the night. They were forced into change
because of the times. Hopefully, today, it's something that businesses,
corporations, newspapers, television stations do because they have a
strong sense of social responsibility. That they help to determine the
way in which this nation thinks and the way its people act.
NEWSHOUR: Do you think that with the work that Jerry's done and the
work that the paper's done on these old cases that the paper has redeemed
itself in some ways?
MYRLIE EVERS-WILLIAMS: What is redemption? Has the paper redeemed itself?
Redemption is an ongoing factor. Perhaps one should not try to sit in
judgment today. I would like to see in 30 years, if I were around, what
was happening then. What progress has been made from today to 10, 15
years from now. There's always room for improvement.
I'm not sure that anyone connected really wanted to redeem itself.
Time, people forced that. I would hope we would look at redemption now
as from this day forward. What are we doing on a volunteer basis, not
what we are doing because we have to do it. Not doing it because we
have to sell newspapers. And, of course, the business of business is
making a profit. But I would hope, and it appears that this paper has
decided, that they can make a profit by fair reporting and that all
people to some degree have dollars that they place in those containers
to get the newspapers out.
|
|