A
look at the rhetoric, returns and network retractions that made covering
Election Day 2000 an all-night affair.
|
EARLY
RETURNS
By 7 p.m., polls had closed in 11 states, with
Bush picking up an early electoral lead. The Associated Press and
the networks called Kentucky and Indiana in Bush's favor, giving the
Texas governor a total of 20 electoral votes.
And
as the networks revved up their coverage, CBS's Dan Rather summed
up television's great expectations: "We would rather be last than
be wrong," Rather said, "If we say somebody's carried a state, you
can pretty much take it to the bank."
|
Nov.
7
(All times EST)
7:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
|

FLORIDA
IN FOCUS
7:30 p.m. -- The networks trained their eyes
on a state that had been a battleground throughout the campaign -- Florida.
An electoral powerhouse with 25 votes, the state governed by George
W. Bush's brother Jeb looked like it could become Gore territory.
|
GORE
TAKES FLORIDA
Florida
became the big story at 8 p.m. as the Voter News Service --
a group pooling the resources of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Fox and the AP
-- called the state for Gore. All of the networks and the AP followed
suit.
"Al
Gore wins the state of Florida and its 25 electoral votes," Peter
Jennings of ABC announced. "It gives him the first big-state
momentum of the evening."
|
8:00 p.m.
8:30 p.m.
|

A
QUICK WIN FOR GORE?
8:30 p.m. -- With Florida ostensibly in Gore's
grasp, the focus shifted to Pennsylvania and Michigan -- key battleground
states with 41 electoral votes between them. Analysts discussed a possible
early victory should Gore carry the two states.
Bush, meanwhile,
was completing a near electoral sweep of the South, picking up Virginia,
Georgia, the Carolinas and his home state of Texas. But NBC's Tim Russert
said the governor would have to "run the table" of remaining
states to win the election.
The
same sentiment reigned at CBS. Anchor Dan Rather said Bush's prospects
were "shakier than cafeteria Jell-O."
|
GORE'S
MOMENTUM
By 9 p.m., many network pundits predicted continued
momentum for Gore. TV broadcasts and the AP placed New York in the
vice president's column shortly after polls closed, and Pennsylvania
and Michigan also fell into Gore's hands.
"Things
are looking good for Gore this hour," Fox News Channel's Brit
Hume said shortly before the top of the hour.
With Gore taking
such an early lead, questions about Bush's continued viability fed
analysts' discussions. For some, the vice president's push meant Election
Night could end early.
|
9:00 p.m.
9:30 p.m.
|

BUSH
CAMP RESPONDS
9:30
p.m. -- Florida
was still the big story for the Bush campaign. At about 9:45,
the Texas governor told members of the press he thought the media had
spoken too soon.
"The networks
called this thing awfully early," Bush said, "but the people
actually counting the votes are coming up with a different perspective.
So we're pretty darn upbeat about things."
As the hour
wore on, those watching the numbers pour in at the networks were getting
a lot less upbeat about their calls in Florida. With the margin between
Bush and Gore growing slimmer by the minute, the
Voter News Service canceled the vote in one Florida county at 9:38,
finally retracting its call in the entire state at 10:13.
|
|
BY
THE NUMBERS
By
the time the VNS advisory came out, though, the networks had already
changed their tune about Florida's status. CNN moved the state back
into the undecided column shortly before 10 p.m., with the other
networks and the AP quickly following.
Red
faces abounded.
"Could
you pass the crow?" CNN's
Judy Woodruff asked colleague Bernard Shaw.
At
CBS, Dan Rather blamed the reversed call on bad data.
"To
err is human," Rather said, "but to really foul up requires
a computer... If you're disgusted with us, frankly, I don't blame you."
|
10:00 p.m.
11:00 p.m.
|

TOO
CLOSE TO CALL
11 p.m. -- Another big break for Al Gore, as
the networks called California, and its 54 electoral votes, for the
vice president.
After their change
of heart on Florida, the networks' coverage centered -- as it would
for much of the remainder of the evening -- on electoral math. CBS's
Rather turned to a miniature election map attached to his desk, while
NBC's Russert kept track of the various
electoral scenarios using a wipe-away marker board -- pointing out the
growing possibility of a 269 - 269 tie in the electoral college between
the two candidates.
"The thing
about tonight is, we don't know who the next president of the United
States will be," Russert said. "This electoral map is as unpredictable
now as it was two weeks ago."
Said CBS's Rather,
"It's cardiac arrest time in the presidential campaign."
|
|
HOLDOUT
STATES
By
12 a.m., many experts thought Election Night would have been
over -- including the Bush campaign, which had scheduled the governor's
victory speech for 11:39 to 11:51 p.m.
But
with both candidates stuck near the 245-vote mark in the electoral college,
it was still anybody's election. With Alaska going quickly for Bush
and Hawaii swiftly for Gore, it all came down to eight states: Arkansas,
Iowa, Wisconsin, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington and a still-deadlocked
Florida.
Oregon
and Washington, both of which use mail-in balloting, became central
to network punditry, since it was becoming more and more likely the
two states would play an important role in determining a winner.
As
the night wore on, the networks stepped up footage of crowds assembled
in Nashville, Tenn. and Austin, Texas, all hoping to be part of a victory
party.

|
Nov.
8
12:00 a.m.
1:00 a.m.

|

THE
NUMBER CRUNCH
As the night rolled on to 1 a.m., it looked like
the party was nearing an end for Al Gore. Wisconsin, Oregon, Florida
and Iowa were the only states left in play, since the networks called
Nevada and Arkansas for Bush and Washington and New Mexico for Gore.
Notably, the Associated Press didn't follow its broadcast colleagues
on the New
Mexico call, and that state did not finally certify its results -- a
squeaker for Gore -- until November 30.
By
now, fatigue and frustration were creeping onto the network airwaves.
Entering his eighth hour on the air, CNN's Jeff Greenfield summed up
some of his colleagues' feelings.
"At
the start of this race, we all thought Florida was securely in Bush's
camp. We all thought the Dukakis states were clearly in Gore's camp,"
he said. "Neither of those things have been true, and that's why
we're here at 1 o'clock in the morning wondering who the president is
going to be."
|
|
ALL
EYES ON FLORIDA
By 2 a.m., the
Sunshine state was all that stood between either candidate and the presidency.
As
with the several preceding hours spent in electoral limbo, the pundits
reigned supreme on the networks. ABC's George Stephanopolous worked
the numbers, NBC's Tim Russert scribbled madly on his marker board.
CNN oscillated between its Capital Gang and Crossfire's Mary Matalin
and Mike McCurry. The NewsHour cameras panned between expert panels
and political commentators Mark Shields and Paul Gigot.
Amid
all the talk was a continuous underscoring of Florida's importance.
"The
key here," CNN's Greenfield said "is, Oregon and Wisconsin
-- no offense to those good people -- are now irrelevant. ... This thing
literally could not be any closer. Florida is the ballgame."
|
2:00 a.m.
2:15 a.m.
|
PRESIDENT
BUSH?
Ten
minutes after the top of the hour, network excitement was again beginning
to build. At 2:16 a.m., the call was made: Fox News Channel,
with Bush's first cousin John Ellis running its election desk, was the
first to project Florida -- and the presidency -- for the Texas governor.
Within
minutes, the other networks followed suit.
"George
Bush, Governor of Texas will become the 43rd President of the United
States," CNN's Bernard Shaw announced atop a graphic montage of
a smiling Bush. "At 18 minutes past two o'clock Eastern time, CNN
declares that George Walker Bush has won Florida's 25 electoral votes
and this should put him over the top."
At
2:20 a.m., ABC's Peter Jennings was less enthusiastic in his
network's presidential call.
"Unless
there is a terrible calamity, George W. Bush, by our projections, is
going to be the next president of the United States."
|
|
TO
CONCEDE OR NOT TO CONCEDE...
At 2:30 a.m., amid television talk of George
W. Bush's quick political rise and references to John Quincy Adams --
the last man to follow his father into the presidency -- Al Gore called
it quits.
In
a concession phone call to Bush, Gore congratulated the governor on
his win and wished him the best. According to his campaign staff, the
vice president left his hotel in Nashville to address a rain-soaked
crowd in the city's War Memorial Plaza.
But
a funny thing happened on the way to Gore's concession. The 50,000-vote
margin between Bush and Gore shrank to thousands. Then, to just hundreds.
While
the networks continued to forecast what a Bush administration might
bring, Gore campaign staff sent their candidate an urgent page: the
fight's not over yet.
|
2:30 a.m.
3:00 a.m.
|

THE
WAITING GAME
The networks
carried news of the Gore-Bush phone call, announcing victory and concession
speeches would follow shortly.
Reports
from each campaign's gathering sites reflected the night's events: An
ecstatic Austin crowd erupted into cheers with each live report chronicling
Bush's win, while a somber mood enveloped Gore supporters, huddled together
in a cold, ironic rain.
The
stages were set, the mood at each location clear. Everything was ready
to go. But nothing happened.
At
3 a.m., with still no solid speech time in sight, the NewsHour
signed off. Eleven minutes later, the AP worked up a press advisory:
Bush's lead had dwindled to 6,000 votes, with counts still forthcoming
from two heavily Democratic counties.
"That
would be something if the networks managed to blow it twice in one night,"
NBC's Tom Brokaw said. Just minutes later, he'd find out that they had.
|
GORE
TO BUSH: NEVER MIND
While
the networks filled time, the campaigns were abuzz with news of Florida's
narrowing vote margin.
Then
at around 3:30 a.m., another call came in to Bush's aides.
It was Gore. In what press reports say was a heated 90-second exchange,
the vice president retracted his earlier concession, saying the vote
margin was too close for either candidate to declare victory.
By
this time, CNN reports from Florida said the margin separating the
two candidates had dropped to 1,300 votes.
Facing
yet another electoral turnaround, CNN's Judy Woodruff admitted she
was stumped.
"I
don't think I have the vocabulary to describe what we have witnessed
tonight," she said.
But
it wasn't just the broadcast journalists who found the election had
again thrown a wrench in their works.
For
print reporters, it meant listening to the sounds of presses screeching
to a halt -- sometimes more than once.
The
Austin-American Statesman was one newspaper lured into a "Bush!"
banner headline -- one that eventually morphed into a more indecisive
"History on Hold." But that meant recalling as many as 59,000
copies of the paper.
The
same calamity hit The New York Times, which ended up shelving 115,000
papers declaring a Bush win at 4 a.m., and The Boston Globe,
which pulled 20,000 faulty copies from its loading docks.
|
3:30 a.m.
4:00 a.m.
|

PRESIDENTIAL
RETRACTIONS
Judy Woodruff
wasn't the only network anchor searching for an explanation when the
networks one by one returned Florida to the undecided column.
CBS
and NBC made their retractions at 3:59 a.m., with the other networks
following soon thereafter.
"We're
not absolutely sure quite what to do next," said Jennings on ABC.
Each
network continued to flash scenes from the crowds waiting in Austin
and Nashville, as faces turned from the joy of victory and the anger
of defeat to a general consternation and confusion.
Just
after 4 a.m., Gore campaign chairman William Daley was the first
to appear on stage in Nashville.
"Without
being certain of the results in Florida," he said, "we simply
cannot be certain of the results of this election."
Don
Evans of the Bush campaign spoke in Austin minutes later.
"We
hope and believe we have elected the next president of the United States,"
he said. "I'm confident when all is said and done, we will prevail."
|
|
A
NIGHT OF INDECISION
"We
don't just have egg on our face," NBC's Brokaw said at 4:45
a.m., " -- we have an omelet on our suits."
The
networks lamented the night's biggest turnabout, but the continually
shrinking margin between the two men remained the early morning mantra.
"Two
hundred twenty-four votes separate these two candidates," CNN's
Greenfield said. "...At this juncture, with a reported 100 percent
reporting, [224 votes] separate George Bush from Al Gore, and separate
both these men from the presidency of the United States."
Shortly
before 5 a.m., Gore had captured the lead in the national popular
vote -- a lead he held onto as counts continued in several states.
Florida
Attorney General Bob Butterworth told a local Florida station shortly
after the top of the hour that an automatic recount of Florida's
votes would begin a few hours later -- and that the count could be completed
as early as 5 p.m.
ABC
signed off shortly afterward, but not before a hot night on the air
got a little bit hotter when a studio light burst into flame. The fire
was put out by a staffer.
|
5:00 a.m.
7:00 a.m.
|

THE
MORNING AFTER
"Good
morning, we do not have a winner," Katie Couric said as NBC's Today
began its usual 7 a.m. broadcast.
But
it was a thoroughly unusual morning. The election day anchor teams had
stayed up into the wee hours, with some, like the NBC and CBS teams,
broadcasting on into their morning programs.
Election
returns had slowed to a trickle as sunrise approached on the East Coast.
But at 6:24 a.m., the Associated Press called the state of Wisconsin
-- and its 11 electoral votes -- for Gore.
Several
morning newspapers -- including The Tampa Tribune, The Orlando Sentinel,
and recalled editions of The New York Post -- echoed their broadcast
colleagues' mistakes, issuing editions with "Bush Wins" headlines
-- yet another goof the media would find themselves apologizing for
soon thereafter.
Some
in the media blamed returns from the Voter News Service. Others blamed
computer data mix-ups. But many in the public -- and in the media --
placed the blame for a night of network retractions square on the shoulders
of the journalists themselves.
"Boy,
they've [the networks] got some explaining to do," former CBS newsman
Walter Cronkite told The Los Angeles Times. "They bear all the responsibility."
|