|
| UNDER SECRETARY CHARLOTTE BEERS | |
January 2003 |
|
|
Charlotte Beers, the under secretary of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs for the State Department, discusses her bureau's mission to improve America's image in Muslim nations. The NewsHour Media Unit is funded by a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts
|
|
TERENCE SMITH: Are you trying to change the image and
impression of the United States and, if so, among whom and to what end? CHARLOTTE BEERS: We don't view it as an image change because the connotation of image is difficult to measure and evaluate. What we are interested in doing is creating dialogue where
there's been silence, and we are very interested in changing misperceptions.
So I'd like to be more specific than say image change. The audiences that we focused on now, and we have special
funds allocated for this in the war on terrorism, would be focused on
the Muslim-majority countries, where the misperceptions are very extreme. TERENCE SMITH: Could you characterize it? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, the ones that I've been particularly
interested in, in a specific aspect -- there's a great belief that the
United States is really anti-Islam, and even though we've all heard
about it, and we've seen improvements; for instance, when President
Bush visits a mosque, it is really a sound heard around the world, but
that doesn't sustain us long enough to get into a good dialogue. So
this percentage of people who believe this is still discouragingly high. And the second thing that's a cousin to this that is important, in terms of a diagnostic of data, is that there's a great belief in Muslim countries that the whole lifestyle of our country and its way of being is decadent, faithless, and therefore not a proper environment for one who wants to practice their Islam religion. Those two things are counterpoints that we want to address. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Influencing public opinion in the Arab world | ||||||||||||||||||||
| TERENCE SMITH: So one of the vehicles that you have designed
and produced is this television ad that I have seen. What are you trying
to accomplish with that ad? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, the ultimate discipline in having someone hear you -- as opposed to talking at them -- is to talk in terms that are relevant to them. That's a discipline all marketing people had to follow
for years anyway, but it's an unusual one in the State Department because
often in the first charter, in forming, we're talking, we're telling,
we're the ones with the words and the message, and we do that clearly,
accurately and swiftly, so there are no apologies there. That's a very
important communication. And one of the stories that's very impressive in the United
States, which happens to fit right into these plans, is that the Muslim
families in this country are thriving. They have an exceptional growth
rate. They have the most beautiful mosques. They have their own schools,
as they like. They live a very typical American life, but very promising. So the question becomes: if you could put real people
on camera, talking about their lives, wouldn't that open a dialogue,
a door? And so that's why I don't call them ads, you know. They're really
documentaries, and the reason we paid for the media is to make sure
that we talked to as many people as possible. Now, this is significant because in the State Department,
we haven't had the means, nor maybe the inclination, to take our story,
our messages to mainstream people, and I, personally, am convinced we
must be about this. When you read about the degree and depth of misperception,
you can't just stay with the elites and the government officials. TERENCE SMITH: What success have you had getting this
ad or documentary on television systems that are, by and large, state-run? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, in many countries we have purchased the media with the agreement of the government -- in Malaysia, in Indonesia, in Pakistan. We have done television, and newspaper and radio. We have
significant frequency, as we would call it in the advertising world.
We have got very high awareness of this message. So point one was accomplished. We also bought pan-Arab television and pan-Arab newspapers
so that we could cross over the countries of Egypt, and Kuwait, and
Lebanon, and so on. So I would say that, point one, clear awareness
and high frequency, during Ramadan, which is a high-television viewing
period and use of newspaper and radio. What we're just learning about what we have accomplished
is interesting. The elites and the government officials were skeptical
or sometimes felt that we were talking about something that, to them,
is very obvious: that American Muslims thrive, and they do well, and
they pray without any conflicts and so on. What we need to teach them in their own countries is that their people don't believe this. Now the test is: what did people hear and what did they learn from it? And we just got back our first research in from the "man
on the street" interviews in Indonesia, and I couldn't have hoped
for a better response because in almost every interview they said that
they didn't realize that people like them could live in such a way,
as they obviously do in the United States. They were a little dubious about who's sending them this
message, a little skeptical, but basically they're relieved and pleased
to see that some of the things they heard are just stereotyping or disproportionate. Now, you could argue this might be the most favorable
country, so we'll have to see how we do in the other countries. TERENCE SMITH: Right. I was told that the only places
that you were able to run this video, get it on the television widely
seen by most of the population, was the three countries that you mentioned,
plus Kuwait. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Yes. TERENCE SMITH: And is that it so far? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, the pan-Arab television has pretty
deep penetration in all of the other Middle East countries, so I feel
like we covered them all well. TERENCE SMITH: Forgive me, but is that the formal name
of the television, the "pan-Arab television"? CHARLOTTE BEERS: No, they're MBC, and Lebanon Television,
and a couple more on the schedule... CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, we didn't ask in countries where
we thought that there would be a problem or where our own bureau recommended
that we not seek approval to run them because we felt we did have good
coverage through these other satellite channels. But, for instance, I expect that we will be taking the whole "Shared Values Initiatives" [public diplomacy campaign] into Morocco, and I think that, in some of these embassies, what's interesting is we're getting extended reach by other people coming in and ask if they can run them, and, and the affiliated coverage all around the country itself. So almost every one of the countries in the Middle East
has their own national coverage, but they also have great influence
by the satellite coverage that comes across the pan-Arab countries.
That's been a great advantage for us because we easily moved into those. And what's interesting is that we have much more extended reach in some of the cities, the countries in Europe and other places around the world are now asking for use of this. In fact, the most successful part of the program has really
been this magazine, called Muslim Life in America. It's turned out to
be a best- seller at the book sales in Casablanca where there's this
huge book show. It's become the most popular piece to be distributed.
So I think we've tapped into a great interest in how people like me
are living in the United States. That's just the beginning of what will
be a much larger program. TERENCE SMITH: Take a country like Egypt, a large, powerful,
central, influential Arab country, allied in many respects with the
United States and the recipient of billions of dollars of U.S., but
they won't run it on their television. Why? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, in fact, they haven't said, no,
officially, and what we have agreed to do together, which I think is
very promising, is that there is a story untold in Egypt about how much
aid and mutual partnerships we've already built in helping that country,
and we've gotten agreement to produce those stories, and they did run
during Ramadan. There's a story of money from the American people in building
a mosque; there's a story about the water being made safe; and the most
recent one, which I just looked at this morning, is a story of the money
we funded in small business enterprises, and these are like test cases
for exactly what Secretary Powell announced this week in terms of the
Middle East Partnership Initiative. So I think that there's more than one way to communicate
the interests of the American people to the relevant audience. TERENCE SMITH: But while they may not have said, no, officially,
they certainly haven't said yes. I'm just wondering why. What seems
to be the resistance or what explanations are given? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, I'm not so sure that I can quote
any one government, but if there has been a reluctance, it's probably
based on the point that they consider it propaganda from the government,
and that line of propaganda all the way down to mutually interested
information is one we'll continue to push against. My point of view would be that this is a real person telling
their story in their own words, which is as close as you can get to
visiting with them, but here's something I'm looking forward to. We're
sending these people to the region, and they're going to be available
for people's questions and answers, and even those countries which didn't
have it on their national channel in their country will get these speakers,
and they will be covered by the local press, and they've become stars
because they have such high coverage and awareness. I think it's very impressive, that these American Muslims are willing to go to the countries and talk about their life, and that's part of the extending events and coverage, and I hope conferences and seminars will follow out of that as well. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Addressing criticism about the U.S. ad campaign | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
TERENCE SMITH: One critic we talked to said the notion
is flawed because, he argued, the idea of what we would call advertisements
or information in video like that is immediately discounted and suspect
by an Arab audience because it's state funded, and therefore, in their
mind, propaganda. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, it's a very good point. We've been very concerned about authenticity, and the reason we went to a partnership with a group called The Council on American Muslims is because not only will they help us make the right decisions, and they picked people, and they had a lot to do with what was put on and made available, but they will then take up the momentum, in terms of the dialogue. They're eager to do it. They come from very diverse backgrounds,
and they're the ones who are managing the Web site called Open Dialogue,
and the response in the Web site is fascinating. People have been encouraged
to send in their comments and their thoughts, and I think their role,
to a large extent, will help people accept the fact that these are real
stories coming from real people. TERENCE SMITH: You also have, and the State Department
I think has had actually for years, a very ambitious speakers program,
in which people go abroad, and they go to the Muslim world as well and
try to talk about American life. I have read criticisms of that program
by Robert Satloff in op-ed page pieces and others who say we're sending,
in effect, the wrong messengers with the wrong message. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, we're guided usually by the speakers
programs, in terms of what the embassy has assessed on the ground there
that would be needed, and so to some extent, it moves like that. These
speakers that we're sending over are part of a direct communications
plan to talk about these peoples and this issue. So I don't agree with
them at all. The other thing that some of the critics talk about is
that religious tolerance is a soft subject. I can't think of anything
less soft than religious tolerance, and I think it's very much in the
charter of the U.S. government to discuss religious tolerance with the
peoples that we're bringing this message to. TERENCE SMITH: Well, Satloff, of course, argues that some
of the individuals, and he names them, have been critical of the United
States or of U.S. policies in Web sites, writings or speeches of their
own. In other words, he's saying we're sending people abroad who are
actually quite critical of the U.S. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, there's a thin line here between 'someone you believe' and 'someone that might be just perfectly in tune with the government.' I know that when I spoke to Egyptian journalists off the record, they said, "She speaks just like President Bush," and I said, "Yes, I do." But what we need to do is walk that line between someone
who has their own opinions, we tolerate great diversity of opinion in
our country, and that's one way of demonstrating it. We would never deliberately send someone out who was antagonizing
some of the major goals of the U.S. Government, and any time we get
a criticism like that, we need to go back and look at our speaker list
and see if we've got the best and the most persuasive people on hand.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Radio Sawa and other efforts | ||||||||||||||||||||
| TERENCE SMITH: Another big effort, Radio Sawa. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Yes. TERENCE SMITH: I've talked to Norman Pattiz about it on
camera, and we'll include his comments in it, but I wonder what you
think of it as an effort that, of course, is still evolving and still
developing, and what you think it's accomplished so far. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, I sit on the board of the [Broadcasting Board of Governors] as Secretary Powell's representative, so I've been participating in terms of supporting Radio Sawa's launch. I think it's particularly admirable that this group of
people started this project two or three years ago, and it took that
long to move it through the process. So just when we just most need
it, it is available, and it is building rapidly an audience that's very
impressive. Now they're in that test-out stage, and they seem, to
me, to be making very impressive progress of putting the meat in with
the charm and the entertainment aspect, but this discipline of having
to be entertaining and relevant is one I'm accustomed to myself. And
now, once we get these audiences which are bumped up as high in some
places of 50 or 60 percent of the target market, then we can begin to
talk about many things. I think Radio Sawa is moving swiftly to broaden the news,
have interaction, have questions handled. So I'm very grateful that
we have a distribution channel like that that's mainstream because one
of our frustrations is that we can't readily meet the mainstream as
much as we need to. There's an information revolution going on all around
us, and it's not just happening in the government halls. TERENCE SMITH: I talked to two Arab-American professors
who have traveled in the Gulf, Jordan and Egypt recently, and they said,
yes, Radio Sawa is being listened to. It is quite popular among younger
Arab listeners for its music, but they dismiss the news because, again,
they see it as propaganda. CHARLOTTE BEERS: I don't think human beings are so able
to compartmentalize their way of receiving information. For instance,
you referred to the fact that some of the people who see these Muslim
life in America stories will be cynical about who brought them. They're
still hearing the story. It still raises a question. It has a moment
of communication and connection that's very valuable. I think the same thing is true of Radio Sawa. No doubt,
there are some people listening to that who are just charmed by the
music, but if you get the news, and it's honest, and it's straightforward,
it's still the truth, and in many cases, we haven't had the truth going
into those homes. I think that makes it powerful. TERENCE SMITH: You used an interesting phrase there. You
said "when people see it or hear it," thinking, again, about
the ads and running them -- CHARLOTTE BEERS: The initiatives. They're not ads. TERENCE SMITH: How many people have seen them? CHARLOTTE BEERS: The reach of this program is really astonishing.
I would say our estimate is over 400 million. TERENCE SMITH: Is it the entire audience? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Yeah. Well, you have to estimate what
the audience is of the various television channels, the newspaper, in
the radio, and then you estimate how often -- and most of the people
have seen these messages ten times in the period of Ramadan, and every
single person we've interviewed so far was deeply aware of them, could
recite the individual what they heard, what they saw, what the young
Indonesian girl did, what kind of work she did. So we verified that we have what we would call very deep
awareness, and that comes from that kind of schedule. You could never
get that in a traditional embassy program. TERENCE SMITH: The 400 million refers to the potential
audience, say, between Indonesia and Morocco... Is that what that number
represents? CHARLOTTE BEERS: That number refers to Malaysia, Indonesia,
some numbers from Pakistan, Kuwait and pan-Arab. So it could be 450
million to 500 million, for example. TERENCE SMITH: Right. But what I'm asking is of that audience..
How do you have a ballpark figure for the number who have seen this
video? CHARLOTTE BEERS: The only way I can measure that for you
or otherwise I'd spent as much money measuring it as we did running
it, is, is to take these samplings country-by-country, and we've just
come out of a sampling of Indonesia, and every single person we interviewed
was not only aware of it, but could repeat the message. So that's a
very high penetration of awareness. Now we'll see how it works in the other countries. Indonesia
is the largest Muslim country, and so that was a very tough test, and,
also, I don't know what kind of penetration we got in more rural communities.
I wouldn't be able to tell you that, and it's a good question. TERENCE SMITH: You suggested yourself earlier that the
Arab countries may be a tougher market, a tougher sell. CHARLOTTE BEERS: They're going to be tougher because they
come in with more cynicism. I think much more dangerous than trying
this, and evaluating it, and giving it to our own team as something
else to study, learn and move on with is silence. That's much more dangerous. TERENCE SMITH: But is there any way, and this is the last
time I'll ask this, is there any way to calculate, from the surveys
that you have and the estimates you may have, as to how many people
have seen it in a rough number? CHARLOTTE BEERS: I'm going to estimate this because I
don't know that number, and I think what we should do, since this is
an important question for you, but it has to be over half the people
who have a satellite or are receiving television in the home. TERENCE SMITH: Right, and that, of course, right away
separates -- into two audiences. CHARLOTTE BEERS: It does. TERENCE SMITH: Because that tends to be the more affluent
people. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, that's why the rural communities
-- well, the penetration of pan-Arab television in the Arab world is
very extensive, and so if we bought a spot on MBC, for instance, a two-minute
documentary, then we can tell you what percent of the population we
went into. And, for instance, those would have gone into in the homes
in Egypt about 30 or 40 percent of the people in that country because
the satellite penetration there is very good, but it's not as true in
other countries. In some cases, these numbers aren't as easy to rank because
we don't have the data that we have so readily in the United States. TERENCE SMITH: Right. The reason I'm pressing you on this
is, is that the critics we've talked to, including some on camera, have
said, 'it's not being seen. It's simply not appearing. It's not being
run by the state-run televisions, and they are the bulk of the audience
and what most of them watch, and therefore it doesn't matter whether
it's any good or not, it's not being seen.' CHARLOTTE BEERS: Actually, that couldn't be less true.
I mean, we have very hard data that Indonesia is deeply aware and has
high awareness. Now that's the only place I've gotten the study results
from, so I can't speak for the others yet, and there is no question
that in a country like Lebanon we're probably talking to 30 percent
of the population, as opposed to a larger number if we had a local television
system, but-- TERENCE SMITH: And in Egypt you would -- CHARLOTTE BEERS: And in Egypt, I think, I think we would probably, because of the newspaper that's run and the radio, and then the pan-Arab television that comes into there, I think we have to be talking to 30 percent of the population as well. That's still about -- many more people than we normally have a conversation with..
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Funding the public outreach campaign | ||||||||||||||||||||
| TERENCE SMITH: What's the budget of all of this? What are
we spending on these efforts that you're just now describing? CHARLOTTE BEERS: We have a certain amount of money that Congress allotted us for these efforts -- basically, under the heading of "War on Terrorism." We've spent about $8 million to this point, which includes
media time, the development of the materials and substantial events
that surround the television, and newspaper and radio. Those would be
things like a digital video conference with some of the Council on American
Muslim People and the people in the countries. There are going to be many more follow-up events, when
we send speakers over, and we organize meetings, and then Muslim life
in America is part of that budget, and that's a 30-page magazine that
we put out, and we've made available in very many languages, and now
we're getting requests from that in countries all over the world. So that's a lot to get done for $8 million. TERENCE SMITH: Eight million spent so far out of a budget
of -- CHARLOTTE BEERS: Fifteen. TERENCE SMITH: Fifteen million? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Yes, and we'll probably spend some more
of that money as we go forward into countries that will be taking the
schedule later, not necessarily tied to Ramadan. TERENCE SMITH: How do you measure success of this? It's
so hard, first of all, to even measure attitude and opinion. How do
you do that? CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, it's an important question how
do we measure it. We have back these smaller samples of people in-country
who are telling us what they saw and what they felt about it, and those
become a lighted path for what we might choose to do next. So they're
diagnostic, they're more in-depth, but they're very essential. We will also learn what kind of awareness we got in a
general way, country-by-country, but I think that our overall goal is
to create dialogue, and so we will measure this a year from now by what
we can read as the consequences of opening up these doors. For example, when a person sends a note in to the Open
Dialogue Web site, the Council of American Muslims for Understanding
people will then create a kind of a dialogue with them. That won't be
on our initiative, but we'll be able to ask them how it's going. When
they arrange a seminar, a conference, a follow-up meeting, the distribution
of the booklet, then we'll find out what kind of extended reach we had. But in the overall, I think we just have to measure it
in terms of have we improved the dialogue, have we started one, and
have we approved the communication ability between us? TERENCE SMITH: The comment I hear again and again is,
well, actually, these countries and these peoples are not anti-American,
they're anti-American policy on specific issues, notably the Israel-Palestinian
issue and until that changes, you can't change attitudes. CHARLOTTE BEERS: Well, fortunately, we don't feel that way or we would have a great deal of silence in what is the middle of a huge information revolution. It's not that we diminish the importance of policy. Every person in the embassy, and every day of Secretary Powell's life is about communicating clearly the policy, as is the case for many officials in the U.S. Government, but we really do have to have conversations with people beyond the policy itself and I completely disagree with people that the number one issue is the Israeli-Palestinian issue, though it is crucial. And the reason for that is several studies we've had back [say] "What are the main concerns in your life?" And foreign policy ends up eight or nine. It's not surprising. It's intuitively obvious, but we communicate on many levels. If we weren't talking policy to the elite in the governments,
we would be missing our first charter, but if we don't understand that
people are concerned about their family, their health, and their faith,
we would be missing an opportunity to have conversations on that level. The Middle East Partnership Initiative is about recognizing
that these things are important. In fact, in the Pew study it talks
about what is the number one concern all over the world, and it's not
foreign policy, even though foreign policy is a very crucial factor,
it is, in fact, the economy, and their role in it, and their ability
to earn a living. TERENCE SMITH: But that same Pew study shows a rising
tide of very critical attitudes towards the United States in most of
the 44 countries that he surveyed. CHARLOTTE BEERS: That's absolutely true. I mean, that
study, and I'm glad to have these studies because they deal not just
with the narrow upper echelon of the countries, but mainstream. We're
doing more of that kind of work ourselves. They're not diagnostic in
the sense that they just tell you what the problem is. They don't tell
you how to solve it. But, clearly, a number of the issues have to do with the
perception of the United States as unilateral, and it's interesting
how quick countries are to say that we don't consider their country
when we're making our policies, and if you ask them the reverse, they'd
have to agree that they often need the freedom to develop their policies
and then present them to the world. But some of this comes with a halo of being a superpower.
That's not to dismiss it; that's just to recognize that those are some
of the underlying reasons. TERENCE SMITH: So you would argue that even with the policies
being what they are, since they are not going to change, there's progress
that can be made in terms of people's attitude. CHARLOTTE BEERS: We're betting every day on that. Every
exchange we do in this country that has been managed for years in such
a successful way, we've just had a group of Afghan women here who witnessed
the election, learned immense amounts and went back home to try to incorporate
that. We also had a group of Afghan women come in for teachers, and then we paired them with teachers. We had a group of women from the Baltic states who came here. Every single time we have a conversation like that, and we send them home enlightened and many times inspired, and we help them with programs that follow up. |
||||||||||||||||||||
The NewsHour Media Unit, including this site, is funded by grants from: |
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||