House rejects ban on transgender surgery for U.S. soldiers

BY  
Army Sergeant Shane Ortega laces up boots before posing for a portrait at home at Wheeler Army Airfield on March 26, 2015 in Wahiawa, Hawaii.  (Photo by Kent Nishimura/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

A Republican proposal to bar the Pentagon from paying for gender transition surgeries drew fierce opposition Thursday from Democrats who called it mean-spirited and discriminatory. Photo by Kent Nishimura/For The Washington Post via Getty Images.

WASHINGTON —”It makes no sense to create soldiers who are unable to fight and win our nation’s wars,” Hartzler said.

But House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi called the amendment an attack on the health and dignity of thousands of U.S. service members, and Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, said Hartzler intended to “politically denigrate” transgender troops.

“Let us not sink to that level,” Hoyer said.

Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter of California said people should decide what sex they are before signing up.

“Figure out whether you’re man or a woman before you join,” Hunter said. “U.S. taxpayers shouldn’t have to foot the bill.”

READ MORE: Are military doctors trained to treat trans patients?

The close vote nonetheless underscored the zeal with which a number of Republicans are seizing opportunities to reverse what they cast as President Barack Obama’s social engineering of the armed forces. Transgender service members have been able to serve openly in the military since last year, when former Defense Secretary Ash Carter ended the ban.

Since Oct. 1, transgender troops have been able to receive medical care and start formally changing their gender identifications in the Pentagon’s personnel system. A Rand Corp. study found that there are between 2,500 and 7,000 transgender service members in the active-duty military, and another 1,500 to 4,000 in the reserves.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis decided late last month to give the military chiefs another six months to conduct a review to determine if letting transgender people enlist in the armed services will affect the “readiness or lethality” of the force. However, the delay doesn’t affect transgender troops who already are serving openly in the military.

Hartzler, a four-term congresswoman who has been mentioned as a possible 2018 challenger to Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., has suggested forcing transgender service members out of the military services. But she backed away from her plan last month, saying she would give Mattis and other senior military leaders the room to settle personnel matters internally.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declined to fully endorse Hartzler’s amendment while telling reporters it’s important for Congress and the Defense Department to work closely together on military transgender policies.

“I want to make sure what we do is in close coordination with them,” Ryan said.

READ MORE: Military chiefs have six more months to review transgender enlistments

LGBT advocacy groups condemned Hartzler’s amendment. Ashley Broadway-Mach, president of the American Military Partner Association, called the proposal a “vicious attack on service members who are sacrificing so much and putting their lives on the line for our country.”

The defense policy bill would authorize $696 billion for managing the nation’s vast military enterprise in 2018, nearly $30 billion more for core Pentagon operations than President Donald Trump requested.

The House also shot down an amendment aimed at getting the Pentagon out of having to submit a report to Congress detailing the impact of climate change on the armed forces. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., said the requirement puts an unnecessary demand on the military at a time when it should be concentrating on defeating the Islamic State group and countering other serious threats.

“Drip by drip we have watched our military’s focus eroded,” Perry said.

The House Armed Services Committee required the report, which calls for the Pentagon to list the 10 military bases most vulnerable to rising oceans, increased flooding, wildfires and other effects of climate change.

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., chairwoman of the House emerging threats subcommittee, said it’s important for Congress to know how global warming will affect the military’s long-term plans.

SHARE VIA TEXT