|
| POLITICAL WRAP | |
February 18, 2000 |
|
|
End-of-the-week political analysis of the South Carolina primary from syndicated columnist Mark Shields and Wall Street Journal columnist Paul Gigot, who are in Columbia, S.C. |
|
Paul, is the race as exciting down there as it appears to be from here?
|
![]() |
|||||||||
| An exciting race | |||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: Have you found the same thing, Mark?
JIM LEHRER: And, Paul, how would you lay that out as to what is at stake tomorrow?
On the other hand, if George W. Bush can stop McCain here, he might be able then to win in Michigan, and he'll have demonstrated that he -- that he can dust himself off from that pasting he took in New Hampshire, and revive his campaign and come back, much as Al Gore did somewhat when he was down in the polls two or three months ago. And that's a much better story line than -- geez, what happened to George Bush, the all conquering nominee? JIM LEHRER: What would you add to that, Mark? MARK SHIELDS: I would just say, Jim, that Governor Bush, I think, has more riding on it right now. I thought for the longest time that John McCain was going right into the -- into the hammers of hell here in South Carolina, because George Bush had it lined up. He had overwhelming support; it was a good fit for him with this state. His father had done well here in the past and was still a widely admired and almost revered figure in the Republican circles. And McCain kept saying, 'I have to win New Hampshire and I have to win South Carolina.' You don't hear him saying that now.
|
![]() |
||||||||||
| McCain could bounce back from loss | |||||||||||
|
PAUL GIGOT: Well, we're going to be in for a lot of spin, but I think that coming close is better for McCain, because he can bounce back, I think, more easily from that in Michigan -- JIM LEHRER: Why is that? Why is that? PAUL GIGOT: Well, because he's ahead right now, and because George W. Bush has got to win in a state like this. I mean, it is lined up for him -- I mean particularly with the last two weeks, what he's been doing to -- you had McCain coming in on that great wave of enthusiasm, biography, and character, and it's a very powerful message for Republicans and independents. It's -- Lindsey Graham says he was his supporter and impeachment manager who introduces him everywhere -- he was the anti-Clinton -- and he stole that character appeal from George W. Bush. now, George W. Bush has fought back by using philosophy and issues and trying to say 'I'm the conservative in the race,' appealing to the Republican electorate. There's no better state to make that kind of conservative case than South Carolina. And if he can't do it here, even if he -- even if he wins by -- you know -- 1 percent -- it's going to be a big sigh of relief. But I think McCain is better prepared to bounce back. JIM LEHRER: Do you agree, Mark?
Now, McCain gave a great opening to George Bush when the McCain campaign pulled a real gaffe by doing that Bill Clinton ad. That legitimized to a considerable degree the negative attacks upon McCain to the point where George Bush could still brandish that one Xerox copy of a leaflet as sort of the justification for another $600,000 television buy. But I mean that's -- in that case if he does lose, having run that kind of a campaign, then it's really a kick in the teeth, and I don't think -- I don't think Governor Bush can recover from a loss after this campaign, where he has made McCain the issue.
JIM LEHRER: Paul, speaking of -- yeah, go ahead. MARK SHIELDS: I just -- he's winning with a pretty -- if he wins, there are some people here that aren't going to be on Christmas card list. I mean, the Bob Jones folks -- these are people that George W. Bush did not associate with for 10 or 11 months. That's why winning is so urgent and so central to his candidacy here. If he loses ugly, it's going to be an awful, sickening and really depressing feeling. |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Smelling the money | |||||||||||
| JIM LEHRER: Paul, talking about the TV and radio ads, much
has been made in the last few days about all the money that's been spent
and that George Bush has now spent $50 million, not in South Carolina,
but he's spent $50 million. Can you smell the money down there?
PAUL GIGOT: Well, I'll tell you if it's available, George W. Bush is buying it. JIM LEHRER: Like what? What's he spending it on? MARK SHIELDS: Gardening shows. (laughing)
JIM LEHRER: How do you smell the money, Mark? MARK SHIELDS: Well, it is. I mean, there's collateral material. There is no gimmick that's ever been used in a campaign that's been passed up here. It's cassettes. It is -- Paul is right -- it's direct mail. It's recorded telephone calls. And McCain is not been bashful in this area. They're spending as well. But I mean, it has ginned up interest in this state like it's never been before in any presidential campaign. Remember, South Carolina has been crucial in the past. Bob Dole did not win -- he won the Iowa caucuses in 1996. He lost Alaska, he lost Louisiana, he lost Delaware, he lost New Hampshire. He came in here and won in South Carolina and he never lost again. So I mean South Carolina is, I mean, boy, this is a central, central place. PAUL GIGOT: Jim, McCain has an awful lot of direct mail, too. All of his isn't exactly St. Francis of Assisi stuff. I mean, he's attacking George W. Bush, for example, one of his flyers, for trying to nationalize education, which is simply not true. He's attacked him on Social Security pretty hard as well. JIM LEHRER: Yeah. Meanwhile and before we go, there's been this campaign between Al Gore and Bill Bradley going on at the same time, and nobody has paid any attention to it. What have we missed, Paul?
The problem, the frustration that Bill Bradley has is John McCain sucked all the oxygen out of the -- out of this race, all the news coverage for him. But I think the Bradley people -- they are rooting for John McCain here Saturday. They'd like him to win because they figure if he wins, they can start using the argument against Al Gore in the next two weeks that if John McCain wins the Republican nominee, he's going to go right at Al Gore on the campaign finance stuff and on character and ethics and truthfulness and maybe Al Gore can't win. Bill Bradley is a better candidate. JIM LEHRER: How do you see the Democrats this week, Mark? MARK SHIELDS: Well, Jim, there was a rather poignant report in the New York Times about Bill Bradley traveling in a bus with three staff members in the bus and traveling bus behind him with just a handful of reporters. I mean, it's a terrible thing about the -- this business. I mean, politics is a very, very cruel and publicly painful business for those in it. You lose and you lose the crowd. You lose the attendance. There's no question McCain is the story. I mean, McCain is the story to the point where George W. Bush this week was billing himself as a reformer and talking about, you know, a soft money bill which would, you know, was immediately attacked by Russ Feingold and a bunch of other people. I mean, this has been McCain's campaign in setting the style, the tone and the direction as well as the format. JIM LEHRER: OK. Well, we'll leave it there and we'll see what happens tomorrow. We'll see you all here Monday night to talk about it. Thank you. MARK SHIELDS: OK, thank you. |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||