|
| POLITICAL WRAP | |
| January 21, 2000 |
||
|
|
Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and Wall Street Journal columnist Paul Gigot discuss the final days of presidential campaigning in Iowa. |
|
JIM LEHRER: And to Shields and Gigot. Syndicated columnist mark Shields, and Wall Street Journal columnist Paul Gigot. They are both in Des Moines tonight. They're both in Des Moines tonight. Mark, Betty Ann says 10 percent of Iowa's registered voters are going to participate. That's only 108,000 people. How important is what they're going to do going to be?
JIM LEHRER: But, as a practical matter, Mark, let's take the Republican race first. Is anything likely to happen in Iowa Monday night that could change who is going to be the Republican nominee? MARK SHIELDS: Yes. If the margin between... You have to understand, Jim, we're going to have many winners and very few losers out of Iowa. The nice thing about the November election is that we have one winner and one loser. But candidates will claim they won the silver, second place. They won the bronze. And candidates will interpret it and so will we in the press, and so will voters look at it. If the margin is quite close in single digits between George Bush and Steve Forbes, it will be a blow to what has been the stated premise of the Bush campaign, that he is invincible. He is inevitable. And the invincibility will have been pierced and it makes New Hampshire that much more important.
MARK SHIELDS: I would say this. If it's really bad weather Monday night, if you're a Bush supporter, you get a choice. You say he's going to win. Everybody is telling us he is going to win, Shields and Gigot are telling you us he is going to win. I can sit in my own home in my own warmth and watch "Allie McBeal" or "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" because he's going to win anyway. In that case, the committed well organized on the ground campaign can make it competitive and bring the upset.
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
| Any upsets in the making? | ||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: Paul, how do you see it? Upset even possible?
JIM LEHRER: You mean nationally he is polling 40's? PAUL GIGOT: In Iowa among... and nationally it's even better. Steve Forbes in the mid-20's right now. I think you have to look at does George Bush get over 40? Does he... Is he able to get his people out? And then Steve Forbes, can he maybe break 30, and make himself, by that performance, a player in New Hampshire? Because right now he's really not a player. The traditional thinking is you get three tickets out of Iowa, three candidates can come out of Iowa, and then go to New Hampshire. Two get out of New Hampshire. It may be this time if George Bush blows away the field, you get only one out of Iowa and that means it's one-on-one against John McCain in New Hampshire. What Forbes is trying to do is to make sure he gets two out of here. To do that I think he's probably got to get close to 30. JIM LEHRER: Let's move to the Democrats. Gore as head in the polls, Paul. What is it that would have to happen Monday night in Iowa that would be anything resembling a "surprise"?
JIM LEHRER: What do you think, Mark, about the Democrats? MARK SHIELDS: I think Al Gore deserves credit for turning around his campaign. Al Gore can thank Bill Bradley... If Al Gore, the campaign of last summer and the candidate of last summer who was really dull as dishwater, uninspiring, unenergetic and totally uncharismatic... JIM LEHRER: And wearing white shirts?
JIM LEHRER: Paul, you mentioned Bill Bradley's heart fibrillation, his heart rhythm problem. The American Heart Association issued a statement today saying relax - this is not life threatening. They confirmed what Bradley has said. Politically is it a problem for Bradley? PAUL GIGOT: I don't think it's a huge problem for Bradley. The timing of it is bad just because if you have any doubts at all, it's just going to be fresh in your memory as you go to the caucuses. But I think that his bigger problems are that he just hasn't found an issue with which he can pry those Democratic regulars away from Gore. He's running a character campaign. And that isn't proving to be enough. I talked to one prominent Bradley supporter, a Democrat, and he said Bradley just wasn't willing to get into a character debate and be explicit about what he was trying to do, saying we got to separate ourselves from the Clinton problems, from the Gore ethical problems. He wanted to do it by misdirection. Without making that kind of a case, he hasn't been able to find a way to rally people here. JIM LEHRER: Mark... Go ahead.
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
| Prosperity has come to Iowa | ||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: I remember that. MARK SHIELDS: -- when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter that fall. The unemployment rate today in the state of Iowa 2.2 percent. JIM LEHRER: That's two below the national. MARK SHIELDS: Two below the national -- 1.6 percent in Des Moines. I mean it's 1 percent in Hancock county up North. These are numbers that are unbelievable. And, you know, there is an old line in politics about peace and prosperity. And Iowa has prosperity and the sense of optimism, the sense of confidence in the future here is deserved and real.
MARK SHIELDS: If you go to the last weekend of the campaign and you're Bill Bradley's campaign, they're up to 2:30 and last night getting out their precinct caucuses that Betty Ann was talking about, getting out the information, the walking lists, the names, the telephone calls to be made, and instead the news is dominated by stories of your own candidate and his health, especially when your candidate was the NBA player -- you know, you say wait a minute. Here's Gore walking around here looking like young Tarzan and, you know, it's in contrast. The other thing is Bill Bradley has run a different kind of campaign. He has been a private man. He hasn't told us about boxers and briefs. That's to his credit. But because he wouldn't tell us about his favorite movies, his favorite books, his favorite philosophers, there is a sense of privacy and it raises questions are there other things perhaps that he hasn't told us, like the health.
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
| Sen. Kerrey's announcement | ||||||||||||||
|
JIM LEHRER: Before we go, Paul, to you, not related to the presidential race, the announcement by Bob Kerrey, the senator from Nebraska, he is not going to run for reelection. How do you read that? What do you think about that?
JIM LEHRER: Mark, Bob Kerrey. MARK SHIELDS: After Paul has raised candidates and senators who defy the party orthodoxy, I assume his next editorial will be a testimony and tribute to John McCain, who has reached across the aisle to Democrats. PAUL GIGOT: I said nice things about McCain. Kosovo. MARK SHIELDS: I knew we'd find one. But I think Kathy Kiley in USA
Today put it well; she called him a charismatic iconoclast. And
that's really what he was. He is enormously appealing and attractive
figure. But for some Democrats today, they are looking upon him as a
Pied Piper. Some who urged him to run in the Senate in 1998 and now
chooses to walk away from it, which is certainly his own decision. I
talked to Chuck Hagel, his Republican colleague, who they have a remarkable
relationship, they're both Vietnam veterans from Nebraska. JIM LEHRER: All right, gentlemen, thank you both very much. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
| Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station. | ||
| PBS Online Privacy Policy Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved. | ||