Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourFUNDED IN PART BYChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting2
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSNEWS FOR STUDENTSSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Law
Online NewsHour
UPDATE Posted: June 19, 2008, 12:45 PM ET   

Court Rules for Workers in Age Bias Lawsuit

In a 7-1 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that when older workers are disproportionately affected by an employment decision, the employer bears the burden of explaining whether there was a reasonable explanation other than age for the action.
Supreme Court; file photo

The case involves workers over age 40 who challenged their dismissals from the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in upstate New York.

Thirty of the 31 workers laid off by the lab in 1996 were over 40. Twenty-six of those employees sued Knolls claiming that the layoffs violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

In a separate decision that favors companies, the court also ruled that states cannot prohibit employers from using state money to influence union-organizing drives. The court ruled 7-2 on California's first-in-the-nation law that bars employers from using state money to influence employees' views on unions in their workplace, the Associated Press reported.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, backed by the Bush administration, said the state was trying to silence employers from weighing in on organizing efforts. Federal labor law allows employers to be involved as long as they don't threaten reprisals.

And in another decision, the court ruled that criminal defendants with a history of mental illness do not always have the right to represent themselves, even though they have been judged competent to stand trial.

The justices, by a 7-2 vote, say states can give trial judges discretion to prevent someone from acting as his own lawyer if they are concerned that the trial could turn into a farce.

The decision comes in the case of an Indiana man who was convicted of attempted murder and other charges in 2005 for a shooting six years earlier at an Indianapolis department store.


---- Compiled from wire reports and other media sources

ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: Supreme Court Watch
RESOURCES
  Profiles of the Justices
  Court History
  Archive
Court Rules for Workers in Age Bias Lawsuit
FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
  News and Lesson Plan Archive



CURRENT NEWSHOUR HEADLINES
U.S., European Stocks Soar in Response to Government Rescue Plans

North Korea to Resume Dismantling Nuclear Plant

Economic, Cultural Concerns Highlight New Mexico Town Hall







LATEST LAW HEADLINES
Connecticut High Court Rules Gay Couples Can Wed
Justices Mull Environmental Law, Job Discrimination
Justices to Weigh Free Speech, Environment in New Term
ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.