Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
The web site of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
Online NewsHour2004 CoveragePrimariesGeneral  Election
Vote 2004
Main Presidential CoverageCandidatesCampaign TrailNewsHour Analysis
General CoverageIssuesKey RacesStudents & Teachers
IssuesSocial Security
Candidate PositionsRecent DevelopmentHistory

President George W. BushPresident George W. Bush
During the 2000 presidential campaign, President Bush campaigned on a promise to allow younger workers to control how part of their Social Security taxes were invested.

The Republican Party platform stated that, "each of today's workers should be free to direct a portion of their payroll taxes to personal investments for their retirement future."

During the first presidential debate in 2000, Mr. Bush said that younger workers would welcome the plan.

"There are a lot of young workers at our rallies we go to, that when they hear that I'm going to trust them at their option to be able to manage, under certain guidelines, some of their own money to get a better rate of return so that they'll have a retirement plan in the future, they begin to nod their heads, and they want a different attitude in Washington," he said.

There has not been any significant movement toward individually controlled Social Security accounts during the president's first term, but he continues to support the proposal. His reelection campaign's Web site states:

"President Bush supports the creation of Individual Development Accounts, providing savings matches for low-income Americans to accounts that would grow tax-free. The president's Social Security framework would also give all wage earners the opportunity to invest in financial assets, an opportunity that only half of Americans can now afford."

His site also backs recommendations put forth by his Social Security Commission aimed at increasing the benefits women receive from the program. Those proposals include expanding benefits for widows, whose checks are now up to 50 percent lower than what they and their spouses had received.

Although the president does not appear to have put changing Social Security as high on his priority list as other domestic initiatives, White House statements indicate the president still supports changes to the current system.

In response to a June 2004 congressional report estimating that Social Security will exhaust its trust fund a decade later than the program's trustee's 2042 projection, White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said the report is "another important piece of information that demonstrates that while Social Security is sound today, it isn't sustainable for the long term unless it's reformed and restructured." That, she said, "is what the president believes we need to do."

Background Information

iconBush 2004: Strengthening Social Security

iconWhite House: The President's Plan to Strengthen Social Security

 

 

enator John KerrySenator John Kerry
Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry's voting record in the Senate and his public statements reflect a clear opposition to the privatization of any of the Social Security Trust Fund.

"We must uphold the promise of Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Clinton and never allow the president and his Republican friends to threaten Social Security by putting it on the Wall Street trading block," the candidate said in May at the Massachusetts Democratic Convention.

Kerry has acknowledged the Social Security program faces long-term challenges, but he has not put forth specific proposals for changing the system. Instead, he has emphasized the importance of protecting the Social Security surplus.

His Senate Web site states, "While Senator Kerry is open to considering various avenues of reform, provided they preserve and maintain benefits for recipients, he believes it is fundamental that the reform effort starts under a sound financial footing. For that to occur, Congress must resist the temptation to spend Social Security surpluses on unrelated causes."

Kerry told the Online NewsHour that he opposes raising the retirement age because "we can't ask people to contribute to Social Security throughout their entire working lives, and then change the rules as they near retirement."

The senator also said he opposes "any means testing which could dramatically cut benefits for some Americans currently receiving Social Security."

When Tim Russert of NBC's Meet the Press pressed Kerry on whether means testing or raising the retirement age would be necessary to cope with the increasing number of retirees, Kerry responded that under President Clinton "we made Social Security whole until 2037."

"Along comes George Bush," the senator continued, "we have a downturn in the economy, an increase in expenditures for the military, and a big, big, big tax cut we can't afford. And all of a sudden, you look worse for Social Security and Medicare. I'm going to put us back on the track that we were in the 1990s. We said we were going to save Social Security first, and we had the ability to do it, without doing all these terrible things that you're saying. I'm not going to do those. I'm not going to cut Social Security benefits. I'm not going to extend the retirement age. And we're not going to have to raise the premiums. We can fix Social Security beginning with a stronger economy."

Background Information

iconKerry 2004: A Plan To Protect And Strengthen Medicare And Social Security

iconVote by Issue Democratic Primary Quiz: John Kerry on the Issues

 

 

Recent Developments

Al GoreWith the impending retirement of millions of baby boomers, politicians have been forced to debate whether and how to change Social Security to prepare for the flood of new beneficiaries.

The "Lockbox"

During the 2000 presidential election, both candidates, Vice President Al Gore and then-Texas Governor George W. Bush, pledged to protect Social Security by putting its surplus in a lockbox.

That surplus is the money left over from the program's revenues after benefits are paid out. The government buys Treasury Bonds with that surplus money -- making the surplus money IOUs from the federal government's general coffers to Social Security.

The lockbox concept meant using the surplus to reduce the national debt, so that it would be easier for the government to borrow money when Social Security had to pay out more than it received in revenue.

There have been votes in Congress on proposals mandating a Social Security lockbox in the past few years, but none has reached the president's desk.

Individual Investment Accounts

In 2001, President Bush established a commission "to study and report specific recommendations to preserve Social Security for seniors while building wealth for younger Americans." It was charged with issuing recommendations that would allow younger workers to invest in "individually controlled, voluntary personal retirement accounts" -- an idea he backed during his campaign for president.

That commission issued three proposals for changing the current Social Security system that would allow for different levels of individual investment. The proposals met with mixed reviews in Washington, and so far none of the proposals have been implemented.

Commenting on the commission's work, then White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said that overhauling Social Security remains one of the president's priorities, although it "may take more time" because of projected budget deficits.

The Boomer Flood

In February 2004 testimony before Congress, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said the baby boomers' retirement "is certain to place enormous demands on our nation's resources -- demands we almost surely will be unable to meet unless action is taken."

President Bush, responding to Greenspan's remarks, said he opposes changes to Social Security for those nearing retirement but reiterated his support for personal savings accounts for younger workers.

The Social Security Trustees Report released in March 2004 said revenues coming into the program are projected to fall below costs in 2018. At that point, the program would begin to dip into its trust fund, which would be exhausted in 2042.

Related Report
Social Security Card
Reshaping Social Security
In November 2001 President Bush's commission unanimously approved recommendations that would allow younger workers to invest a portion of their Social Security contributions in the stock market, sparking a national debate about the future of the program
HistoryTop

Social Security RecipientSocial Security retains the basic structure that it had when President Roosevelt signed the program into law in 1935: Workers pay into the system and then receive checks when they retire.

Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin told the NewsHour in May 2000 that President Roosevelt designed Social Security to decrease the chances it would be dismantled.

"[T]he interesting thing Roosevelt said was that the reason he wanted the employees to contribute was not simply for the economics, but he knew if they contributed, government could never take it away from them. If the government came along later and said, 'we don't want this program anymore,' it would be so embedded in the hearts and minds of the American people, because their own money had gone into it, and I think that's why it had become the 'third rail' for such a long period of time," she said.

In 1939, lawmakers included spouses of retired and deceased workers among those who could receive benefits. Disability insurance was added to the program in 1956.

Originally, Social Security benefits remained constant. In 1950, Congress authorized the first increase in benefits, but it was not until 1972 that legislation passed authorizing automatic cost-of-living increases.

In the early 1980s, projections of deficits for the Social Security program spurred President Reagan to appoint a panel that recommended changes to the program. Their work led to the taxation of Social Security benefits, the inclusion of federal and nonprofit employees in the program, and an increase in the age when workers could begin receiving full benefits.

-- By Karyn Schwartz, Online NewsHour

Related Report
The History of Social Security
The Social Security Act was signed into law by President Roosevelt on August 14, 1935. In addition to several provisions for general welfare, the new Act created a social insurance program designed to pay retired workers age 65 or older a continuing income after retirement.
By the People Election 2004
The Online NewsHour's Vote 2004 is a part of PBS' By the People: Election 2004
Your guide to PBS election news and resources

The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.