Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
The web site of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
Online NewsHour2004 CoveragePrimariesGeneral  Election
Vote 2004
Main Presidential CoverageCandidatesCampaign TrailNewsHour Analysis
General CoverageIssuesKey RacesStudents & Teachers
IssuesTrade
Candidate PositionsRecent DevelopmentHistory

President George W. BushPresident George W. Bush
President Bush, a supporter of free trade, has continued U.S. participation in the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization despite some disagreements with the WTO's decisions, including a recent ruling on U.S. steel tariffs.

The president also has negotiated free trade agreements with a number of individual nations. Recently the administration has pursued a new "Free Trade Area of the Americas" that would create a trade zone linking North America with Central and South America.

The White House Web site says "America is economically stronger when we participate fully in the worldwide economy. When 95 percent of the potential customers for American products live outside the U.S., America must reject policies that would result in economic isolationism."

The White House says that free trade helps create jobs for American workers "by opening foreign markets to American exports -- as well as by encouraging foreign companies to set up operations in the United States. Foreign-owned firms directly employ more than 6.4 million workers in the U.S. -- jobs that might otherwise go to foreign workers -- and that does not include the millions of people who work at companies that supply parts and material to foreign-owned firms."

The Bush administration also argues that free trade has been a boon to American consumers by lowering the price of goods and increasing choices in the marketplace.

"Over the past decade, NAFTA and the Uruguay Round agreements [which established the WTO] have raised the standards of living of the average American family of four by up to $2,000 a year," says the White House, citing a report issued by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

However, the president has admitted that free trade can displace American workers.

"As we recognize the benefits of free and fair trade, we also recognize that any job loss from economic change, whether arising from trade or technology or increased productivity, is painful for some workers and their families," says the White House Web site.

To provide relief for American workers displaced by free trade the Bush administration has proposed:

- $23 billion for job training and employment assistance;

- $250 million for community colleges "to train workers for industries that are creating the most new jobs, as well as funding for new secondary education programs to better prepare high school students for the jobs of the 21st century"; and

- $1.1 billion for training and cash benefits for workers dislocated by increased imports or a shift of production to certain foreign countries.

"Over the long-term, trade is the most certain path to lasting prosperity," President Bush said at the Summit of the Americas in January 2004. "The openness of our market is the key driver of growth in the region and a testament to the United States' belief in the mutual benefits of trade."

Background Information

iconBush 2004: The President's Economic Security Agenda

iconThe White House: Jobs & Economic Growth

Senator John KerrySenator John Kerry
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., has supported free trade throughout his career in the Senate. He voted for the North American Free Trade Agreement, Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China and "fast track" trade negotiating authority for the president. Kerry also has said, however, that President Bush has not done enough to enforce trade agreement rules or to protect American workers from the negative aspects of free trade.

"It would be a terrible mistake for the U.S. to suddenly try to button up and move away from globalization. It's happening, no matter what," Kerry said during a Democratic debate in South Carolina in May 2003. "We have to manage it more effectively. What we need is not to cancel NAFTA. We need trade … What's missing is a president who is prepared to negotiate to keep it from being a rush to the bottom, to raise the standards for people."

Kerry has proposed strict enforcement of existing trade agreements and environmental and worker protection guarantees for future agreements.

"Some nations have consistently violated agreements by the World Trade Organization," says Kerry's campaign Web site. "They have taken unfair actions to block U.S auto companies from selling in their markets. Many products from China are counterfeit or don't meet industry standards. While this administration has not used the remedies available under the World Trade Organization to crack down on these violations and help U.S industries, John Kerry would."

Kerry proposes a series of measures to improve trade agreements including:

- Ordering "an immediate 120-day review of all existing trade agreements to ensure that our trade partners are living up to their labor and environment obligations and that trade agreements are enforceable and are balanced for America's workers" and not signing "any new trade agreements until the review is complete and its recommendations put in place." Kerry also "believes that all new trade agreements must have strong labor and environmental standards";

- Using the World Trade Organization to stops countries like China and Japan from purposely and unfairly keeping their currency "undervalued relative to the U.S. dollar to promote exports in the United States and undermine U.S. products abroad";

- Enforcing intellectual property provisions included in current agreements in order to ensure that companies can freely enter into partnerships and "share their technology without losing control of it";

- Using WTO rules, diplomatic pressure and existing U.S. laws to stop countries from using "non-tariff barriers, such as making it difficult to access finance or have obscure investment requirements, to undermine U.S. exports. For example, auto exports to Japan are still essentially blocked by complicated rules."

Background Information

iconKerry 2004: Restoring Jobs & Rebuilding Our Economy

iconVote by Issue Democratic Primary Quiz: John Kerry on the Issues

Recent Developments

End of trade talks in Cancun, MexicoThe Steel Tarriff Dispute
In December 2003 President Bush announced he would repeal tariffs on foreign steel imposed in March 2002. The move avoided a threatened trade war with Europe and Asia.

The tariffs, covering a wide range of steel products from several Asian and European nations, were originally scheduled to remain in effect for three years, until 2005, to give U.S. steelmakers time to modernize their facilities to better compete against intense foreign competitors.

President Bush's decision came weeks after the World Trade Organization's highest court ruled that the U.S. steel tariffs violated global trade laws, opening the way for member nations to retaliate with billions of dollars in punitive tariffs against U.S. products.

Some of the president's critics said the original imposition of the tariffs were politically motivated and designed to win the president support in steel-producing states. The administration has said the tariffs were designed to give the U.S. steel industry needed respite in order to prepare to compete with international producers and that by the time the WTO ruled the tariffs had served their purpose.

The European Union had warned it would slap $2.2 billion in sanctions on American products, starting in mid-December 2003, unless the United States ended the duties on steel imports. Japan and South Korea -- other major steel exporting nations targeted by the U.S. tariffs -- also said they were considering retaliation.


WTO Talks Break Down
In September of 2003, long-standing tension between industrial and developing nations came to a head at the World Trade Organization meeting in Cancun, Mexico. Talks collapsed after a group of developing countries banded together despite differences in their own agendas and demanded large concessions from richer nations, including the slashing of farm subsidies. Experts have said the collapse of the talks jeopardizes the WTO's goal of a comprehensive global trade agreement by 2005.

Related Report
Cargo Ship
The WTO & World Trade
While the World Trade Organization's mandate is to foster and regulate trade, protesters accuse the body of benefiting developed nations at the expense of poorer ones.
HistoryTop

President Bill ClintonNAFTA
When President Clinton and Congress enacted the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1992, over the objections of labor and environmental groups, it spawned what the PBS documentary "Commanding Heights" called a "decade of free-trade activism."


Many trade agreements with individual nations have followed the enactment of NAFTA.

NAFTA proponents have said the agreement has raised the standard of living for consumers and workers in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Opponents have said the agreement has led to U.S. companies relocating jobs and factories to Mexico where they exploit cheaper labor and operate under lax environmental laws.

GATT & the WTO
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was established in the United Nations at the behest of the United States and the United Kingdom during the post- World War II period of rebuilding. This period of international trade consideration by the war's victors also produced the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which were specifically aimed at reconstruction and economic development.

The purpose of GATT was to liberalize world trade by reducing tariffs and quotas and to lay the foundation for an international free trade agency. GATT introduced a "most-favored nation" philosophy that said a particular country's trade agreements with its top trading partner would automatically be extended to its other trading partners.

The establishment of an international trade body was postponed because of concerns by some GATT member nations over concerns that it would reduce their sovereignty and ability to control their own labor and economic policies. The U.S. Congress, for example, refused to support the original charter for an "International Trade Organization." As a result, GATT continued in effect for nearly 50 years and eventually included 125 nations. GATT's provisions also eventually covered an estimated 90 percent of world trade. Between 1947 and 1995 the agreement's signatories completed eight "rounds" of major international trade negotiations under GATT provisions.

The World Trade Organization, which grew out of the "eighth round" of GATT negotiations, was established in 1995 and now includes some 146 countries whose stated goal is to "help producers of goods and services, exporters, and importers conduct their business."

The WTO's function is to "to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible."

Opponents of the WTO accuse the body of benefiting developed nations at the expense of poorer ones. As the WTO continues to negotiate regulations and mediate disputes, public opinion of the organization remains deeply divided.

Opponents of free trade and globalization have targeted meetings of the WTO with protests, some of which have turned violent, as with the 1999 WTO meeting in Seattle that resulted in 500 arrests, an estimated $17 million in lost shopping revenue and nearly $3 million in property damage.

-- By Jason Manning, Online NewsHour

Also on PBS.org
Factory Laborers
Commanding Heights
A look at globalization, world trade and economic developmentm -- including the forces, values, events, and ideas that have shaped the present global economic system.
By the People Election 2004
The Online NewsHour's Vote 2004 is a part of PBS' By the People: Election 2004
Your guide to PBS election news and resources

The PBS NewsHour is Funded in part by: The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Additional Foundation and Corporate Sponsors
Program
Support
From:
Copyright © 1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.