Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
The web site of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
Online NewsHour2004 CoveragePrimariesGeneral  Election
Vote 2004
Main Presidential CoverageCandidatesCampaign TrailNewsHour Analysis
General CoverageIssuesKey RacesStudents & Teachers
Key RacesMissouri Governor
State Profile
Posted: September 24, 2004
In the 2004 presidential election, Missouri appears to be living up to its legacy as a national battleground state and political hotbed, where elections are tightly contested and neither Republicans nor Democrats ever seem to maintain the upper hand.

Born amid one of the nation's earliest and bloodiest political battles, the Show Me State has been plagued by discord for much of its 183-year existence. From its beginnings, divisions based on geography, economics and race have created a state that is not quite Republican, not quite Democrat, and has shifted often in its political preference.

A Bellwether State, with Republican Tendencies

Despite its political pendulum tendencies, Missouri has been consistently recognized as a bellwether state. In fact, Missouri voters have correctly selected every U.S. president in the 20th century except one (backing Adlai Stevenson instead of Dwight Eisenhower in 1956). Even the state's voting results in 2000 mirrored the national electorate, with 50 percent for George W. Bush and 47 percent for Al Gore. Given this track record, many political pundits consider Missouri a "microcosm of America."

Jim TalentWithin the state itself, political seats are relatively evenly divided between Democrats, who largely enjoy their strongest support in urban areas, and Republicans, who receive their greatest backing from rural areas and suburbs.

Outgoing Democratic Gov. Bob Holden in 2000 eked out a victory with little more than 21,000 votes against Republican Jim Talent -- who two years later won the Senate race against Democratic incumbent Sen. Jean Carnahan by an equally slim margin. In 1996, Missourians also elected another Democrat, Mel Carnahan, as their governor -- this time by a wider lead against his Republican competitor.

On the federal level, the state's senators are also Republican: Sen. Christopher Bond, who is battling to keep his seat this year, and Talent, elected in 2002. Representatives for the state's nine congressional districts are split with five Republicans and four Democrats. Yet, this slight majority suggests a gradual predilection for the GOP -- for this year at least.

The Missouri Senate has been predominantly Republican since 1998, and the House gained a Republican majority after the 2002 election for the first time since 1954. Several political reporters and analysts attribute the Republicans' recent ascendancy to a rise of conservative social values.

David Webber, associate professor of political science from the University of Missouri in Columbia, explained the slight shift in voters' attitudes: "Missouri was always a conservative Democrat state -- but it's gradually become more Republican in recent years -- in the last 10 years. I attribute that to guns, abortion, and I think state Republicans have been better organized than state Democrats."

Foundations of a Battleground State

Today's political debates are tame compared to those that helped form the state in the 19th century. The United States acquired Missouri from France as part of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, but the question of whether to admit the pro-slavery territory into the union played into the highly charged national debate between slavery supporters in the South and abolitionists in the North. In 1820, legislators finally agreed to the Missouri Compromise that recognized Missouri as the 24th state and established Maine as a new, slave-free state to maintain the precarious North-South balance.

Yet, the state's struggle with slavery did not end with its formal admission to the union in 1821. The infamous 1857 Dredd Scott case -- in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled an African-American man was the property of his white "owner" regardless of whether he lived in a slave-holding or free state -- originated in Missouri.

When North-South tensions ultimately erupted into the Civil War, Missouri became one of the war's frontlines. Despite its pro-slavery laws, Missouri did not secede from the union to join the Confederacy like many southern states in 1861.

Throughout the tense pre-Civil War period and during the war itself, Missourians were sharply divided in their opinions about slavery and in their allegiances, aiding both Union and Confederate forces with troops and supplies.
For most of the 20th century, Missouri's Civil War political divisions persisted: Ancestral southerners in the north typically voted Democratic, pro-Union descendents in the southwest voted Republican, and the southeast was split between parties.

The geopolitical divide in the 21st century


Today, Missouri ranks as the 17th most populous state with most of the growth occurring in and around St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield. The state's dwindling population received a boost in the 1990s from an economic improvement in the trade, manufacturing and service industries.

Missouri's racial makeup remains predominantly Caucasian, comprising 84 percent of the state's population. African Americans make up roughly 11 percent and largely vote Democratic, Webber noted. The state has also seen a growing Latino population, though their voting patterns are not known, Webber said.

More important than racial or even socioeconomic demographics to voting trends is the state's geography, political scientists say. Veteran political correspondent Jo Mannies of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch sums it up as the "rural-urban" divide.

While rural areas were hugely influential in deciding Missouri elections during the 20th century, metropolitan areas and the burgeoning outer suburbs had the biggest impact on elections since then -- and will likely determine the winners in 2004, Webber told the Online NewsHour.

The remaining rural voters -- largely Republicans -- "will have less impact on the outcome of the gubernatorial race," he said.

Twenty years ago, many farm areas traditionally voted for conservative Democrats, but now tend to vote Republican, Mannies told the Online NewsHour. Only one Democrat, Ike Skelton, represents a district in the Ozarks that is predominantly rural.

St. LouisRepublican strongholds are found in the quickly growing Southwest region and most outer suburbs -- notably St. Charles County, the state's largest growing district located outside St. Louis City, and Greene County, outside of Springfield, Mannies said.

Meanwhile, Democrats continue to maintain their ground within the cities, such as St. Louis and Kansas City. But, Mannies noted, the immediate counties around these cities -- St. Louis County and Jackson County, respectively -- represent some of the largest voting blocs in the state and do not adhere to either party.

-- Compiled for the Online NewsHour by Liz Harper
Key Race

Main: Missouri Governor Race

Matt Blunt (R)

Claire McCaskill (D)

Missouri State Profile
Campaign Information

Claire McCaskill for Governor

Matt Blunt for Governor
Reports From Missouri
St. Louis Project Focuses on Local Issues
KETC/Channel 9 and FOCUS St. Louis will collaborate on the Democracy Project, an effort to increase community awareness of Missouri issues.
-- KETC, St. Louis
By the People Election 2004
The Online NewsHour's Vote 2004 is a part of PBS' By the People: Election 2004
Your guide to PBS election news and resources

    REGIONS | TOPICS | RECENT PROGRAMS | ABOUT US | FEEDBACK |SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS:
POD|RSS
SEARCH
Funded, in part, by:ChevronIntelBNSF RailwayWells FargoToyotaMonsantoCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.