Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourFUNDED IN PART BYChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting2
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSNEWS FOR STUDENTSSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Politics
Online NewsHour
Vote 2008: Presidential Election Coverage

Presidential Race

Obama Meets with al-Maliki in Baghdad

By Alexis Matsui on July 21, 2008

Presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama met with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Monday on the latest stop of his high-profile overseas tour as the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Sen. Barack Obama with Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq; AP Photo

Obama arrived at al-Maliki’s Green Zone headquarters where he also met with U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker as well as Iraqi national security adviser Mawaffak al-Rubaie, according to the New York Times. The senator also met briefly with Gen. David Petraeus, but is scheduled to have another meeting with him at a later time.

In what he described as a “wonderful visit” with al-Maliki, Obama discussed details of U.S. military involvement in the country as well as his plans for eventual withdrawal. After meeting with the Prime Minister, Obama met with Sunni politician Tariq al-Hashimi, for further discussion. The Illinois senator expressed optimism about progress in Iraq after the meetings.

“You see the activity that is taking place, the people in the shops, the traffic on the streets, clearly there’s been an enormous improvement,” he said, according to the Times.

Monday morning, Obama’s presidential rival Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, said he hopes Obama’s visit will cause him to rethink his strong stance against the war.

Obama’s visit to Baghdad followed a morning trip to Iraq’s second-largest city, Basra, where he met with Iraqi and U.S. military leaders and American troops at military base. The Illinois senator is traveling with Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., who are accompanying him during his trip through Europe and Afghanistan.

The presumptive Democratic nominee, a long-time opponent of the war in Iraq, has proposed a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq within 16 months, and a recent article in the German magazine Der Spiegel has raised controversy after reporting al-Maliki’s alleged support of his plan.

The magazine reported that al-Maliki was largely in support of Obama’s timeline, although a spokesman for the Iraqi government said the magazine’s translation of an interview with al-Maliki was inaccurate. A translation provided by the New York Times quotes al-Maliki as saying: “Obama’s remarks that — if he takes office — in 16 months he would withdraw the forces, we think that this period could increase or decrease a little, but that it could be suitable to end the presence of the forces in Iraq.”

McCain has lambasted Obama for his stance on an Iraq withdrawal, saying the Democrat should rely on reports from top military advisers on the ground rather than public pressure to back out of the war.

However, even the Bush administration, which has defended U.S. action in Iraq and resisted the idea of a timeline for withdrawal, signaled a change in its stance last week, saying the U.S. had reached an agreement with al-Maliki to set a “general horizon” for a withdrawal.”

“For the first time in the national security debate, Obama’s advisers believe that McCain has been placed on the defensive, since his reluctance to support a ‘time horizon’ now differs not only with the position of his Democratic opponent but also with those of the White House and the Iraqi prime minister,” Politico’s David Paul Kuhn wrote.

Make a Comment   |   Comments (2)    |   Email    |   + Del.icio.us    |   + Facebook   |   + Digg

Comments

  • Posted:
    07/22/08 at
    06:04 AM
    gdp : Re: Those wto politcal advisors commenting on obama and mccains position on iraq /afganistan. Comment: the Republican one was a robot, and a very intelligent sounding one either. You should have told him that: "democrats believe that a timetable of withdraw may lower violence by instilling a sense of confidence and independence". I think you needed to say this over and over like a robot just as he was saying a timetable would be dangerous and irresponsible.
  • Posted:
    07/23/08 at
    12:27 AM
    L.L. : Regarding the following: "McCain...saying the Democrat (Obama) should rely on reports from top military advisers on the ground rather than public pressure to back out of the war." If the military is not responsive to "public pressure" then there is a dissconnection between the interests of the people and the state. Idealy the state should represent the interests of the people, however I think in America it is clear that there is a widening gap between the wishes of the people and state. I also think that since the state is not representing the people, the form of governance is moving rapidly away form democracy and closer to totalitarianism.
Post a Comment:
(The Online NewsHour encourages readers to comment on our Vote 2008 blog posts. We seek comments that are brief, on topic, civil, truthful and not abusive. We pre-moderate comments, so it might take some time for your comment to appear. Thanks for waiting.)
Name: (required, pseudonym ok)
Email address: (required, will not be published)
Comment:
 

 
ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: Vote 2008
PRESIDENTIAL RACE
  Candidates
  Analysis
OTHER CAMPAIGNS
  Senate
  Governor
RESOURCES
  Reporters' Blog
  What's at Stake
  NewsHour/NPR Election Map
  Feeds
  Archive
  The Primaries
FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
  Lesson Plans
  the.Vote
Search Blog Entries

ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.