Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

   
the Online NewsHour
E-mail This Page Print This Page
the Online NewsHourFUNDED IN PART BYChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting2
BROWSE BY
REGION
TOPIC
RECENT PROGRAMSLOCAL TV LISTINGSSUBSCRIPTIONSTEACHER RESOURCESSEARCH


REGION: North America
TOPIC: Politics
Online NewsHour
Vote 2008: Presidential Election Coverage

Presidential Race

Colorado Delegates Front and Center on Invesco Floor

By Anna Shoup on August 28, 2008

DENVER — As Sen. Barack Obama accepted the Democratic nomination Thursday evening, the home-state delegation had a front-row seat — a tribute both to its work as host and its position as a key state in November. Sen. Barack Obama at Invesco Field; Photo: Alexis Matsui, Online NewsHour

Colorado has taken the stage as a new battleground state as the Democrats hope to deliver the state’s nine Electoral College votes to Obama and elect Senate candidate Mark Udall.

At this convention, the phrase “turn the state blue” echoed in many states’ delegate discussions as they strategize a plan against presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain.

Colorado, where Obama holds a razor-thin lead in a RealClearPolitics poll average, is no exception.

“We’re absolutely in play. As a state, we have a Democratic governor and both of our state houses and we are absolutely in a position, I think, and I think you’ll see it, to take the state for Barack Obama,” said Lynn Young, a first-time delegate from Colorado Springs.

Hosting the convention in Denver and opening Obama’s speech to 80,000 members of the public captured the around-the-clock attention of the world’s and the state’s media.

That, delegate Anthony Graves said, could swing the Centennial State toward Obama and draw attention to the concerns of Colorado voters.

“The big issues for most Coloradoans start with the economy. Coloradoans are impacted. They’re sitting around their kitchen tables, they’re talking about how the ends are not being met and they’re looking for answers. And I think that Sens. Obama and Biden, they have the answers for America.”

Stan Matsunaka, the former Colorado state Senate president, said the nation’s focus on domestic energy will give Colorado more attention on the political map.

“People here in Colorado know that the economy’s stagnant and that we have in Colorado a richness in renewable energy, and we’ve already made a commitment in this state. And if we go even further, Colorado’s always going to have a place at the table.”

Make a Comment   |   Comments (4)    |   Email    |   + Del.icio.us    |   + Facebook   |   + Digg

Comments

  • Posted:
    08/29/08 at
    07:00 AM
    Jacquelyn : I am so very Proud!!! I too was born in 1960, I was just a baby on 8-28-63 but I did get to attend to 30th anniversary of Dr King's Speech in Washington D.C. I began in politics at the age of 9 yrs old and have followed every since. This is a moment I did not think I'd live to see. GOD BLESS AMERICA
  • Posted:
    08/29/08 at
    09:54 AM
    Cherie : I'm very proud tonight of nearly everyone... except Gwen Ifill for letting Jesse Jackson get away with hijacking their interview. Give props, yes; tell history with appropriate perspective, absolutely... but for Ifill to ask "how did he (Obama) come so far in just four years" and let the Rev. Jackson run on about those who came before Obama without Ifill bringing the interview back into focus was just bad journalism. Shame on you, Gwen!
  • Posted:
    08/29/08 at
    08:34 PM
    Pokey : Over the entire time period of the election '08 primary and democratic convention my husband and I have chosen to watch the Jim Lehre News Hour over CNN because we trusted this program to report only those events and statements that are credible and as always, to select experts who provide analyses that are well founded on all sides of the issues. During the first year of the Primary season we were particularly pleased with the Mark Shields and David Brook Friday evening debates. However, there has been a marked decline in the quality of David Brook's reporting for the last five or more months. Having watched the News Hour since the 1980's we have enjoyed Shields performance for many years with Brook's predecessors, Gigot and Bergen. However, Brook appears to have lost his willingness to do more than express his emotional positions. His commentary last night at the Invesco Stadium represented a significant decline in the quality of his performance. His positions were sadly lacking in depth and historical justification. It was embarrasing on several occasions to hear his off-handed comments followed by Shield's fascinating commentary comparing last night's momentus event to previous historical conventions. The final blow came when Brook announced that he thought Obama's speach would go down in history as poor, suggesting that the News Hour historian from George Mason University would agree with him. The historian simply answered that he did not agree. Unfortunately Brook seems to have lost his will to be a meaningful participant in the News Hour debate with Mark Shield. In fact, there seems to be an emotional quality to his answers suggesting a shallowness that was not appearant in earlier programs. We would urge the directors of this wonderful program to explore other possible participants who naturally reflect conservative positions on political issues to appear opposite Mark Shields.
  • Posted:
    08/29/08 at
    08:58 PM
    Roger J Tijerino : Having the first black person "chosen" as one of two candidates for the US presidency was inspirational, historic, and yes, patriotic. That the speech was eloquent and emotional only made it the more pertinent. Given those facts, it was heartening to hear "right wing" commentators such as David Gergen praise Senator Obama's performance. Unfortunately the same can not be said for that ubiquitous PBS "talking-head" David Brooks. Of all the commentators that spoke last night, he was the only one who gave it a "thumbs-down." Although Mr. Brooks has tried to position himself as non-partisan � to no avail as far as I�m concerned -- this time he crossed the line; not only did he cross over to the right-wing lunatic fringe, but he�s at the threshold of the racist camp. His comments last nigh were so out of touch that PBS should can this academic want-a-bee, and restore some integrity to the Newshour; otherwise, even die-hard Democrats will have to switch to George Will on ABC. Or maybe the Newshour should let Rush and Cal Thomas join Brooks.
Post a Comment:
(The Online NewsHour encourages readers to comment on our Vote 2008 blog posts. We seek comments that are brief, on topic, civil, truthful and not abusive. We pre-moderate comments, so it might take some time for your comment to appear. Thanks for waiting.)
Name: (required, pseudonym ok)
Email address: (required, will not be published)
Comment:
 

 
ADDITIONAL FEATURES
  Main: Vote 2008
PRESIDENTIAL RACE
  Candidates
  Analysis
OTHER CAMPAIGNS
  Senate
  Governor
RESOURCES
  Reporters' Blog
  What's at Stake
  NewsHour/NPR Election Map
  Feeds
  Archive
  The Primaries
FOR STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
  Lesson Plans
  the.Vote
Search Blog Entries

ABOUT US | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS / FEEDS: 
POD|RSS
Funded, in part, by:ChevronPacific LifeVestasCorporation for Public Broadcasting
            Support the kind of journalism done by the NewsHour...Become a member of your local PBS station.
PBS Online Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996- MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.