Skip to content

   

Filmmaker Statement

In January 2009, The New York Times ran a story about the controversy around the arrest of two young men from Midland, Texas, for the possession of eight Molotov cocktails at the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul. The story immediately captured our imaginations. With the government characterizing David McKay and Bradley Crowder as domestic terrorists intent on murdering or maiming police and Republican delegates, and the defense asserting that the boyhood friends were victims of a charismatic mentor and an overzealous government, what was the real story?

A dozen phone calls and several days later, we were on a plane to Minneapolis to attend McKay’s federal trial. (Crowder did what nearly all those facing federal charges do — he took a plea.) The odds against McKay were long — the federal conviction rate is easily over 90 percent. He faced up to 30 years in prison.

We met David McKay at Sherburne County Jail in a prison jumpsuit, hands shackled, the day before his trial was to begin. We arrived with very little idea of who McKay was. Walking out six hours later we had begun to understand an idealistic, affable and very frightened McKay, yet many more questions remained unanswered.

Why, we wondered, did the FBI spend more than six months closely following political naïfs with no criminal history? What led these young men to build eight homemade bombs? Did the government save innocent victims from domestic terrorists bent on violence and destruction? Or were Crowder and McKay impressionable disciples set up by a dangerous provocateur? Or did the answer lie somewhere in between? With so many questions we were consumed, talking for hours about the characters’ relationships and how their personal experiences illuminated larger national issues and debates. By the time we left the trial and headed back to California we knew we had to make the film.

While our initial intent had been to cover the legal drama, it quickly became clear that a central mystery we wanted to unravel was what had happened between McKay, Crowder, and their activist mentor Brandon Darby from the time they first met at an Austin bookstore up until McKay’s and Crowder’s arrests more than six months later.

We started piecing the backstory together with a range of intriguing archival material: intimate jail house phone calls, audio of FBI interrogations, electrifying archival footage of Darby railing against the government in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, dozens of surveillance photos and video of street battles between protestors and police. We also learned that the Department of Homeland Security had granted $50,000 to the Twin Cities’ Joint Terrorism Task Force for surveillance cameras at the convention — and that we could access that footage through the Minneapolis police department. We screened hundreds of hours — capturing everything from the FBI following our characters as they arrived in town to McKay and Crowder shopping for bomb making materials to video from Darby’s handheld camera.

Working closely with our editor (Greg O’Toole), graphics designer/producer (Mike Nicholson), composer (Paul Brill) and cinematographer (David Layton) we developed a look, feel and sound for each strand of archival material with the goal of integrating them in a coherent aesthetic whole. And after gaining the trust of McKay, Crowder and their families and shooting with them day after day, we were able to capture, vérité-style, the intimacy and rawness of their experiences.

It was critical that the audience could feel key events that transpired before we came to the story (the meeting at Ventana del Sol coffee house in Austin, the van ride from Texas to Minnesota, the making of the Molotov cocktails...) and we were able to bring those moments to life though recreations — footage woven with recollections in interview. (Note to press: some of our vérité scenes have been mistaken for recreations. To be clear, we only recreate past events where we clearly could not have been present. The audience can distinguish these scenes because they are a mixture of treated, impressionistic footage and interview bites cut back and forth. Where we have intimate conversations between characters unfolding before the camera there is no staging or recreating.)

Over the two and half years it took to make the film, interviewing FBI agents, attorneys, defendants, family members, jurors and journalists, we were repeatedly surprised by the twists and turns the story took. At several points we were forced to re-evaluate our perspectives — debates about personal responsibility versus government accountability erupted in the field and the edit room. We learned a lot through the process and committed early on to building the twists, moral ambiguity and big questions we wrestled with into the film for audiences to experience.

Better This World has already inspired intense discussions around the country — encouraging people to grapple with what we see as some of the critical tensions of our time: between civil liberties and security and between democracy and dissent in a post-9/11 world.

— Katie Galloway and Kelly Duane de la Vega, Directors/Producers





Talk About This

Share This

Upcoming Films