Any documentary filmmaker will tell you that getting a film into Sundance is a Herculean achievement in itself, but some also come away with an award. The prizes are more akin to a feather in oneâ€™s cap, secondary to the real prize most are hoping for at the festival — a sweet distribution deal — but no oneâ€™s going to knock it. Awards give credit to filmmakers whoâ€™ve toiled for years behind a camera or in an editing bay, so let emâ€™ have it!
They certainly do so in spades at Sundance, doling out no less than thirteen documentary prizes, as it did over this weekend, which marked the end of the 2012 film festival. The U.S. jury — Fenton Bailey (Inside Deep Throat), Heather Croall (Sheffield Doc/Fest), Charles Ferguson (Inside Job), Tia Lessin (Trouble the Water, Michael Moore films) and Kim Roberts (Editor on Food, Inc., Waiting for Superman) — and World Cinema jury — Nick Fraser (“Storyville”), Clara Kim (Walker Art Center), and Jean-Marie Teno (Sacred Places, Clando) — were typically A-list, so there must also be a large measure of personal pride in being recognized by oneâ€™s esteemed peers.
The winner of the top award, the Grand Jury Prize, went to The House I Live In, directed by Eugene Jarecki, who won the same honor for his Why We Fight in 2005. Jareckiâ€™s latest is a personal look into the war on drugs.
The U.S. Audience Award was won by Kirby Dickâ€™s The Invisible War, a film about the epidemic of rape in the military. Both films deal with subjects that donâ€™t necessarily ring 2012 — they each could have been made two decades ago, and for that reason, they deserve all the more attention because they address issues that have been festering in our society for too long.
In the World category, the top prizes went to The Law in These Parts, directed by Raâ€™anan Alexandrowicz, which won the Grand Jury, and Searching for Sugar Man, which nabbed the Audience Award. The Law in These Parts is about the legal system in occupied Palestinian territories — not exactly a subject that will put a lot of butts into theater seats, so the films needs all the publicity it can get. On the other hand, Sugar Man, about a 70s rock icon, won the same popularity contest as last yearâ€™s Senna, which did very well at the box office, so thatâ€™s a good sign.
In terms of prestige, the next best award is the Directing nod, and Lauren Greenfield won her first, for The Queen of Versailles, about a real estate empire under pressure during the recession. Emad Burnat and Guy Davidi won the directing prize in the World category, for 5 Broken Frames. Burnat, a Palestinian farmer-turned-filmmaker, who documents the conflict in his hometown, won over crowds with his humble acceptance speech.
Technical awards in documentary filmmaking are a delight to see. The importance of great editing and cinematography ought to be honored in documentaries. (Academy Award committee, take notice!) Those prizes went as follows: In the U.S. category, Chasing Iceâ€™s Jeff Orlowski won Excellence in Cinematography while Enat Sidi won the Editing Award for Detropia. In the World section, Lars Skree won for cinematography for Putinâ€™s Kiss and Lisanne Pajot and James Swirsky won for editing Indie Game: The Movie.
And, in a sign to the world that this is not your grandpaâ€™s film festival, organizers awarded some funky prizes, including a U.S. Special Jury Prize for Grace Under Pressure, to Macky Alston, for Love Free or Die. Malik Bendjelloul won the Celebration of the Artistic Sprit award for Searching for Sugar Man. And Alison Klayman won the Special Jury Prize for Spirit of Defiance for her Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry.
Appropriately enough, considering the award, during her accepting speech, Klayman asked the audience to extend their middle fingers at her while she took a photo, a very Weiwei thing to do, which she planned to send to the Chinese dissident artist, who lives in Beijing.
Read more posts like this one...