HomeAirWaterEarthTalk For Educators
Umbra Fisk
Researcher Extraordinaire
I'm moonlighting for POV's Borders, but in my main gig at Grist Magazine, I unearth answers to readers' most pressing environmental questions and publish my findings in a column twice monthly.

I Recommend...
Audubon's Seafood Lovers Guide
Tailpipe Tally
True Food Network
American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy

Consumer Guide to Home Energy Savings from American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
The Consumer's Guide to Effective Environmental Choices: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists by Michael Brower and Warren Leon

Vertical header

Ask Umbra
astute advice on all things green

«  Something's Fishy Bigfoot Prints » 

The Environmentalist's New Clothes
Monday, Mar 15, 2004 (02:01 PM)

Dear Umbra,

I've never appreciated man-made fabrics -- polyester and its cousins invariably feel less comfortable to me than cotton or wool. Until recently, I thought this personal preference also had the happy side-effect of making me a greener clothes-shopper, since producing natural fibers doesn't involve long chains of polymers. A friend recently claimed otherwise, telling me that the growth, harvesting, and shipping of cotton from around the globe (indeed, my very favorite all-cotton shirt was manufactured in Burma -- yikes!) means it does more damage to the environment than the factories that produce the artificial fabrics. Is my friend right? Should I resign myself to a more Elvis-like wardrobe?


Dearest Steve,

I've got some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that you'll be hard-pressed to find a common textile which isn't soberingly toxic to produce. It makes sense if you think about the raw materials -- wood, cotton, sheep, oil -- and what it might involve to transform them into a soft blouse. So what's the good news? It's not clear that one fabric is far better than another, which means you can avoid the Elvis look. The modern environmental era has introduced techniques for evaluating the life cycle impacts of products such as textiles. Such an evaluation sometimes results in clear-cut guidelines for shoppers, but in the contest for The Environmentalist's New Clothes, I can't find a clear winner.

All textiles, as currently manufactured, require large volumes of water throughout the manufacturing process. Spinning, dying, weaving, scouring, sizing -- all involve flushing the threads or fabric with water at one point or another, and often that water comes away contaminated with chemicals used earlier in the process. Common toxins include Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and dioxin-producing bleach. Synthetic/cotton blends are usually treated with formaldehyde, which may account for the continued sightings of a well-preserved Elvis.

Thread materials are also water-intensive and toxin-heavy. Cotton is renewable in that it can be replanted, but it is not grown sustainably. It's said that cotton accounts for one percent of U.S. crop production but ten percent of U.S. pesticide use. Pesticides are used not only to deter pests but to defoliate plants for harvesting convenience. Rayon is made from cellulose (wood pulp, with its own relationship to poor forestry practices) -- and talk about toxic: Turns out that sulfuric acid is handy when transforming a tree into a chemise. Fabrication of petroleum-based fabrics like nylon and polyester is energy-intensive and greenhouse-gas producing. And, sheep are often bathed in organophosphates to control parasites. Thus completes our brief look at the laundry list of lamentable dilemmas for the clothed.

But you can still be thoughtful about the clothes you buy, and of course I'm full of suggestions for improving your eco-couture. To wit:

-- Buy used clothing. To the uninitiated it may seem that used clothes are dowdy, ripped, pilly, and available in unattractive stores. To the addicted, secondhand clothes are a treasure trove of budget-friendly fashion. There are shopping environments for all types, from Goodwill to the Gentleman's Consignment shop.
-- Continue to buy "natural" fabrics that need little laundry care. Customers' clothing use has a surprisingly significant environmental impact. Avoid clothing that must be dry cleaned, frequently bleached, or washed in hot water, and you'll do quite a bit to cut down your impact.
-- Buy sustainably made clothing when you have the cash. Organic cotton is becoming more readily available and doesn't leave pesticide residue on your neck. Polar fleece made from recycled plastic is labeled as such and is a good thing.
-- Buy fewer clothes. No, I did not say wear fewer clothes.



Send Me A Comment

«  Something's Fishy Bigfoot Prints » 

Past Entries
02/11 Every Drop Counts...
02/17 The Eternal Conundrum: Paper or Plastic?
02/23 D.I.Y.
02/25 A Cleaner Clunker?
02/27 The Diesel in the Details
03/01 Downside of Organic Produce?
03/03 Not Always Greener
03/05 Trash Art: the Director's Cut
03/08 The Rising Stocks of Anti-Ox
03/10 Plastic Not-so-Fantastic
03/12 Something's Fishy
03/15 The Environmentalist's New Clothes
03/17 Bigfoot Prints
03/22 Drinking Your (Re)fill
03/24 Fresh Frozen
03/26 Hydroponic Attacks

sod busters
no such thing as garbage
recycling plastic bags

Grist Magazine
Can't get enough Ask Umbra? Visit Grist Magazine, where you can submit questions and sign up to be notified every time a new column is published.

Environment Home  |  Air  |  Earth  |  Water  |  Border Talk  |  For Educators  |  Resources  |  Credits  |  Site Map
POV's Borders Home  |  About POV's Borders  |  Contact Us | 2005 Call For Entries
POV Home  |  About POV  |  POV Projects  |  Newsletter  |  About American Documentary
            Copyright © 2004. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by MOVABLE TYPE 2.64