 |
Robert
S. Baratz, MD, PhD, DDS is a practicing primary
care internist and the Medical Director of South
Shore Health Center in Braintree, Massachusetts.
Dr. Baratz has also practiced emergency medicine
since 1991, and has practiced dentistry since
1972. He formerly was a full time professor at
Boston University School of Medicine, in the Anatomy
Department where he taught Cell Biology and did
basic research on allergies, pattern formation,
embyrogenesis, diabetes and cancer. His interests
are broad and involve integrating all of his training
in solving complex medical problems. Currently
he is on the Faculty of Northeastern University.
Besides his academic background he has worked
in industry and has been the medical director
of several medical device companies, and has helped
form and direct clinical research on devices and
pharmaceuticals. He is considered an expert on
interactions of materials with the body, including
dental materials. Dr. Baratz has served as an
expert for the US Food and Drug Admnistration,
the VA, The US Air Force, The Centers for Disease
Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, The United States Senate, and numerous
state licensing authorities. He also has consulted
widely in legal cases regarding health fraud and
with the insurance industry. Dr. Baratz is currently
President of the National Council Against Health
Fraud. Dr. Baratz is also considered an expert
on the fraudulent aspects of claims for multiple
chemical sensitivity, chiropractic care, chelation
therapy, chronic pain, and a number of alleged
dental conditions, including temporomandibular
joint disorders.
|
 |
| |
|
|
For
links to Robert Baratz's home page and other related
infomation please see our resources
page.
Baratz
responds :
|
Bo
asks:
I
recently had a neck adjustment and have had a
headache ever since. I went back to the chiropractor
and had it done again and am still having headaches.
I have contacted 2 GP doctors who have pooh-poohed
the idea that the headaches can be related to
a neck adjustment. Neither one of them knew anything
about the possibility of an adjustment being a
precursor to a stroke and treated me as if I were
a total ignoramus. In fact one sent me to a supposed
neurologist and when I got to his office I discovered
that his background is in chiropractics. I have
absolutely no faith in anyone who has a background
in chiropractics and am at a loss at what to do.
Anything that you can suggest to me will be of
great help. Thank you for your response.
|
|
Baratz's
response:
Find a real neurologist. There are many causes
of headache, and getting a correct diagnosis is
important before any treatment is done.
|
|
Dr.
Matt Erickson asks:
Considering
the study by Dr. Scott Halderman D.C., M.D., PhD.
which demonstrated the risk of arterial dissection
to be approximately 1 in 5 million why are so
many MD's jumping on the band wagon over a flawed
Canadian study which court testimony by an MD
revealed that it was flawed because data was omitted?
In addition, why is the medical profession so
against chiropractors? Consider that between medical
errors and adverse reaction to prescription your
profession is the 3rd leading cause of death on
the planet just behind heart disease and cancer.
Also
consider that your profession is losing billions
of health care dollars annually to alternative
procedures. Consider how my malpractice insurance
is less that 2K per year because of how safe my
profession is. Consider just yesterday I had a
patient misdiagnosed with tennis elbow that required
a second opinion of another doctor to make sure
and then within 5 minutes of being in my office
the "tennis elbow" was completely resolved. Consider
that your own monstrating that flouride is toxic
and actually causes tooth decay. I would also
like you to provide me with the stats on effective
spinal surgeries. I would also love you to provide
me with one double blind placebo study that proves
that medicine outside of emergency medicine has
increased life expectancy at all in the past 100
years.
|
|
Baratz's
response:
Let's try to stay on point, or at least on
the topic. The risk of arterial dissection is
real and much higher than 1:5,000,000 as stated
by me and by many studies on the topic. Not wanting
to believe that this is a real problem will not
make it go away. There is no justification for
manipulating necks for the alleged "treatments"
being given for the alleged subluxations. The
first duty of a health care practitioner is to
do no harm. If there is no benefit and there is
clear risk, even if only 1:5,000,000, then the
procedure shouldn't be done. The FDA has taken
drugs off the market for lower risk numbers than
that.
|
|
Shandra
asks:
Re:
Chiropractic manipulation. How does adjusting
the neck form blood clots in the vertebral artery?
Aren't these arteries very well protected in the
body? What scientific evidence do you have that
this can lead to stroke? In the study that linked
chiropractic manipulations to stroke, were the
percentages of people that had a stroke any higher
for their age group than the people who never
saw a chiropractor? I appreciate your timely response.
Thank You.
|
|
Baratz's
response:
Rapid torque applied to a kinked blood vessel
stretched over a bony prominence can cause a tear
in the innermost lining layer of the vessel. Once
this lining is disrupted theunderlying connective
tissue (collagen) is exposed. Exposed collagen
causes platelets to stick. When the platelets
stick they begin the process of forming a clot.
The clot can then propagate. It can also break
off and travel, causing a stroke when it eventually
reaches and blocks a smaller branch of the vascular
tree in the brain. The percentages of people who
saw chiropractors that had a stroke were higher
for their age group than the people who never
saw a chiropractor.
|
back to top
|