n the years between the Seneca Falls Convention and the Civil War, powerful links existed between antislavery and women’s rights advocates. Virtually all women’s rights advocates supported abolition. Not all abolitionists supported women’s rights, however; since some believed that it was inappropriate for women to be engaged in public, political action. Still, these differences among abolitionists did little to deter the common work of those who embraced emancipation for both slaves and women.

From 1848 through the Civil War, those who argued for wider roles for women generally called themselves women’s rights advocates rather than suffragists. The right to vote was included among their goals, but their agenda was much broader than any single issue. In addition, most women’s rights supporters had been introduced to reform efforts through the antislavery movement and specifically through the American Anti-Slavery Society (AASS) led by William Lloyd Garrison. Members of the AASS argued that abolition could only be achieved by persuading Americans—slaveholders and non-slaveholders alike—that human bondage was against God’s law. Many Garrisonians, including a large number of Quakers, refused to participate in electoral politics due to the government’s support of slavery and the U.S. war against Mexico. Garrisonian women did not necessarily oppose woman suffrage, but they emphasized instead the right of women to gain equal access to education and employment; equality within marriage, the family, and religion; and a married woman’s right to property, wages, control over her own body, and custody of her children. They advocated similar rights for African Americans and focused particularly on the sexual abuse of slave women as one of the strongest arguments for eradicating slavery.

The AASS provided women with opportunities to speak, organize, and write on behalf of slaves; and to hold office, raise funds, and edit newspapers for the cause. Lucretia Mott, co-organizer of the Seneca Falls Woman’s Rights Convention, was a Garrisonian abolitionist and a charter member of the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society founded in 1833, which included both African-American and white women in its ranks. Many Garrisonian societies were interracial and mixed-sex organizations, and all argued on principle for both racial equality and a woman’s right to a public role. Other antislavery groups, such as the Liberty and Free Soil parties, focused on political action as the best means of achieving abolition. However, they attracted fewer women to their ranks and relegated them to secondary roles, such as raising funds to support men’s activities and agendas.

It was only in the aftermath of the Civil War, when Republican politicians introduced the 14th and 15th amendments to the U.S. Constitution extending citizenship and suffrage to former slave men, that suffrage gained the central place in the battle for women’s rights. Then former abolitionist allies, including those who had long advocated women’s rights, divided over the movement’s priorities. Many abolitionists initially advocated universal suffrage, for both African Americans and women. When that was made impossible by the insertion of the word male in the 14th and 15th amendments, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, with support from African Americans like Sojourner Truth, campaigned against any amendment that would deny voting rights to women. Among their opponents were former allies like Lucy Stone, Antoinette Brown Blackwell, Wendell Phillips, and Frederick Douglass, who argued that it was “the Negro’s hour” and that women’s suffrage would have to wait.

As a result of this division, Stanton and Anthony founded the National Woman Suffrage Association, a women-only organization, in 1869 to promote a federal amendment guaranteeing woman suffrage. Stone and Blackwell formed a rival organization—the American Woman Suffrage Association—that included men as well as women and advocated a state-by-state campaign for female enfranchisement. Not until 1890 would the divisions created by the battle over black men’s enfranchisement heal, allowing suffragists and former abolitionist allies to work together again in the National American Women’s Suffrage Association. Nonetheless, even though the abolitionist-women’s rights alliance fractured in the late 1860s, suffragists owed a substantial debt to the antislavery movement, which had served as the most important training ground for its leaders and the most important repository for ideas of sexual as well as racial emancipation in the decades before the Civil War.

About the Author: Nancy A. Hewitt is Professor of History at Rutgers University. She received her Ph.D. at University of Pennsylvania in 1981 and taught at University of South Florida and Duke University before moving to Rutgers in 1998. She is the author of Women’s Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822-1872 (Cornell University Press, 1984) and Forging Activist Identities: Latin, African American and Anglo Women in Tampa, Florida, 1870s-1920s (University of Illinois Press, forthcoming). She has also edited a collection of articles, "Women, Families and Communities: Readings in American History," aimed at helping teachers integrate stories of women into American History courses. And she has facilitated curriculum integration workshops on gender and race for middle school, high school, and college teachers in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Illinois, and New Jersey.