ne of the best-kept secrets in the closet of American history—that’s what Susan B. Anthony’s absence keeps hidden. The United States government, professing to be “of the people, by the people and for the people,” was instead (in the words of one 19th century reformer) a government “of rich white men, by rich white men and for rich white men.” Anthony’s life tells a bold story of patriotism, of demanding that the country walk its talk: that it end a system of human ownership and bring slaves into the political designation of “people” and free all women from the bonds of sexism that they, too, might be considered “people” under the law.

With this movie, the secret is out. Women finally received the basic right of citizenship, the ballot, one hundred and forty-four years after Jefferson proclaimed equality the bedrock of American government. We should celebrate the birth of the republic on August 26, 1920, not July 4, 1776, because the “consent of the governed” didn’t became reality until then. The country just had a very long gestation period.

This truth is embarrassing, as we proclaim ourselves the model of democracy to the world when, in reality, the women of Russia and many other countries received political equality before United States women.

But this secret is nothing compared to the one blocking Elizabeth Cady Stanton from view. Woman suffrage has been achieved and, as Stanton said, once a reform has been won, everybody wonders what all the fuss was about. Stanton’s issues are still causing a fuss. They are, in fact, among the hottest political potatoes today. The “arch enemy to woman’s freedom skulks behind the altar,” she declared, and proceeded to demand that Christianity remove oppressive passages from the Bible, since they were, she maintained, the foundation of woman’s second-class status.

Stanton’s religious concerns were practical as well as theoretical. Her patriotism demanded that the wall separating church and state hold firm against the onslaught of Christian conservatives determined to put God in the Constitution and prayer in the public schools in the 1890’s.

Anthony, however, enticed conservative women into the suffrage movement, and they brought with them segregation and xenophobia. Stanton declared that she would rather never vote than let these women create a Christian state with the ballot. Anthony’s side won. Winners write history. They wrote Stanton out. Not men, but women—the new suffragettes—wrote her out. Male historians simply followed suit.

Ken Burns says, “if you don’t know where you’ve been, you can’t possibly know where you are and where you’re going.” Not knowing the battle for religious freedom that Stanton (and thousands like her) fought 100 years ago, we don’t recognize it today, or have the practical guide of historical experience to direct us in our patriotic struggle.

Should history be the numbing stories of comfortable (or boring) truths or should it shake us out of our complacency: sometimes outrage and sometimes delight and always empower us? If we choose to be challenged, you wouldn’t believe the legions of amazing ancestors banging on the door waiting to be let in to tell their stories! Stanton and Anthony are only the tip of the iceberg.

About the author: One of the first women to receive a doctorate in this country for work in women’s studies, (UC Santa Cruz), Sally Roesch Wagner was a founder of one of the first college women’s studies programs (CSU Sacramento). Having taught women’s studies for twenty years, she now tours the country as a writer, lecturer and historical performer, “bringing to life” Matilda Joslyn Gage and her better-known woman’s rights ally, Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Dr. Wagner is the Director of the Matilda Joslyn Gage Foundation in Fayetteville, New York.