Posts Tagged ‘JoEllen Killion’

“Ask the Expert” session #13 with JoEllen Killion

Monday, December 14th, 2009

JoEllen KillionWe are sad to announce this is the final “Ask the Expert” post from JoEllen Killion for 2009. We sincerely appreciate Ms. Killion’s time and look forward to our continued conversations with NSDC’s deputy executive director as PBS TeacherLine forges ahead in the constantly evolving world of online professional development. Stay tuned for our next series of “Ask the Expert” sessions coming in 2010.

Throughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This Q&A focuses on Web 2.0 tools for professional development.

Q. What are a few web 2.0 tools for sharing and collaborating that I could share and use with my mentees and other districts mentors? How would I use them?

A. The good news is that there are resources available and the bad news is that there are very few excellent resources. Tools such as Skype, iChat, Google apps, search engines, Delicious, PBWorks, and Bookshelf are tools and sites mentors and coaches can use. iMovie (readers are probably guessing now that I am a Mac user), Wikis, Twitter, blogs, Nings, etc., are all tools that can be used.

  • A mentor can send a tweet with a thought of the day.
  • A mentor could use iChat to have a face-to-face conversation or to observe in a classroom while not at the school.
  • Mentees can gather in a community on Google to talk about handling student assessment and share examples.
  • Mentors can share their Delicious libraries with their mentees as a way of letting them know what resources they have available.
  • A group of teachers teaching the biology in multiple schools in the district can set up a Ning community to share resources. This represents just some of what is available.

The possibilities are endless. PBS TeacherLine’s Peer Connection brings together the power of many of these tools, resources, and sites into one user-friendly, easily accessible site. 

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” session #12 with JoEllen Killion

Monday, December 7th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This Q&A focuses on goal setting.

Q. Can you recommend a good activity for goal setting that I can use for the first meeting I have with my new mentee’s this year?

A. Goal setting begins with deep analysis of student-learning data. By identifying the specific skills and concepts students are missing and prioritizing them in terms of importance as a foundation for developing future learning, schools develop their student learning goals. Teachers then use classroom data to develop their classroom learning goals that align with school goals. New teachers also develop performance goals that align with their performance standards.

To develop classroom-learning goals, mentors review with their mentees data about student achievement. From this review, they identify students’ strengths and areas for improvement. From the areas for improvement, mentors help their mentees consider which of those areas are fundamental to future success, which are aligned with the class or grade-level curriculum, and which are essential to students’ future success. From this prioritized list, mentors help their mentees write SMART goals about student achievement.

  • Specific
  • Measurable
  • Attainable
  • Results-focused
  • Time specific

Example: By November 1, 90% of the students will determine which of three problem-solving strategies is most appropriate to use for a given situation, and apply the process to a problem, and explain their rationale and problem-solving process.

Performance goals begin with a review of the district’s and/or state’s performance expectations for teachers. Using the criteria for teacher evaluation, a mentor and mentee would identify the mentee’s areas of strength and areas for growth. Together they would develop a SMART goal related to teacher performance standards. The mentor would then work closely with the mentee to determine what the mentee needs to learn to develop this area, what evidence will demonstrate increased performance in this area, and how best to work together to improve this area of performance.

Example: By November 30, I will implement a classroom and behavior management system that reduces disruptions to classroom instruction to no more than 1 per day and establishes routines so that students can access resources for independent work 90% of the time.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” session #11 with JoEllen Killion

Friday, December 4th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This Q&A focuses on adult learners.

Q. Research tells us that adults learn differently than children, what are some things I can do to ensure I am appropriately meeting the needs of adult learners?

 A. Adults are learners and they may or may not learn differently than children. Some research suggests that they do; some doesn’t. There is a wide body of literature on adult learning and a good deal of controversy on how adults learn. Some authors to know about include Knowles; Kegan; Cross; Cranton; Mezirow; Vella; Merriman & Caffarella.

 It is helpful to read about some of the theories of adult learning and development to develop a deeper understanding about adults as learners. Yet, there are some immediate ideas to keep in mind.

  1. Adults are not children.
  2. Adults choose whether to learn.
  3. Adults seek respect and recognition for what they do know.
  4. Adults bring their backgrounds to their learning environment.
  5. Adults are protective of their integrity and self-esteem.
  6. Adults want learning to be efficient.
  7. Adult learners are challenging to classify.
  8. Adults have clear expectations for their learning; seek to understand them and meet them.
  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” Sessions 8-10 with JoEllen Killion

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

JoEllen KillionOur guest bloggers and the holidays put a kink in the “Ask the Expert” posts so I will provide 3 posts at once. Sorry for the delay!

Throughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This Q&A focuses on feedback and evaluation recommendations.

Q. I was recently hired as an elementary school literary coach. Can you recommend some good books or articles I should read to help prepare me for my new role?

A. There are several that I recommend.
Killion & Harrison, Taking the Lead
Knight, Instructional Coaching
Moran, Mary Catherine, Differentiate Literacy Coaching
Toll, The Literacy Coach’s Survival Guide
Lyons & Pinnell, Systems for Change in Literacy Education
Jay & Strong, A Guide to Literacy Coaching


Q. Where can I find out more information about providing effective feedback to my mentors?

A. NOTE: I want to clarify this question. Is it about giving feedback to mentors or mentees? Who is the person giving feedback? A program supervisor or teacher? I am going to share an answer, but it may not be correct.

Feedback requires clarity, factual information rather than judgmental or inferential information, specificity, timeliness, and ownership. Use this guideline for giving feedback:

  • Be clear about what you want to say
  • State it factually
  • Make it specific
  • Give it promptly
  • Use I rather than you
  • Use inquiry rather than indictment
  • Build understanding
  • Focus on the positive (what to do) rather than the negative (what not to do)

What’s the difference between these two statements?

1st Example: Your students were off task during guided reading and didn’t complete their work. They shouldn’t be doing that.

2nd Example: I noticed that students in class today moved around during guided reading groups. The assignments were written on the board and the materials were in the bins for them to get. Several went to the class library. Three went to their backpacks. Two sharpened pencils. Three left the room with the bathroom pass. I am curious about what the expectations are about their movement when guided reading groups are in process, how their adherence to the expectations is acknowledged, and what happens when they don’t adhere to the expectations. I am also curious to know your thoughts about how movement affects student learning in your classroom.

There are books about feedback available, yet the most powerful way to learn about giving feedback is to practice. Sometimes writing feedback in advance helps the mentor feedback that aligns with the guidelines suggested.


Q. How often should I be evaluating my mentees?

A. Unless specifically required (and in writing), mentors do not evaluate their mentees. Mentors provide feedback, as described above, to their mentees as frequently as possible. It is important to distinguish between evaluation and feedback. Evaluation is a judgment about performance. Feedback is information. Review the two statements below:

Evaluation: You are doing a great job.
Feedback: Students had a task to complete after you taught the lesson today. Students heard you give three directions and saw you model them. Then they worked independently. During that time, you walked around and helped individual students. I also noticed you writing on a clipboard. I am curious to know what your reason(s) was for giving the task, what the nature of the task was and how it related to what you taught, what kinds of questions students were asking you, and what you were noting on your clipboard.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” session #7 with JoEllen Killion

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This week’s Q&A focuses on mentors gaining repsect from the teachers they support.

Q. Recently, I have been mentoring a veteran teacher, per the request of the building administrator, who is very resistant to my ideas.  She feels her current practices are working and don’t need to be changed.  What are some quick strategies to gain her respect?

A. Veteran teachers have wisdom and want to be respected as people who are experienced and who are successful. Sometimes if is helpful to compliment, ask about what makes teaching such a rewarding profession for this person, ask the teacher what advice he or she would offer a novice teacher. In this conversation, ask what data the teacher currently uses to assess student learning and the effectiveness of his or her practice so the coach knows something about the teacher and what he or she values.

Data conversations may follow. The key word in this question is feels. What evidence supports that feeling? Identify what data are available in the school and classroom to help inform decisions about teaching and learning. Coaches may want to connect teachers to data by showing them how to access the data and how to interpret and use it. Begin first by identifying strengths from data and then areas that need attention. Recommend data gathering strategies for getting information about the effectiveness of teaching and learning.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” Session #6 with JoEllen Killion

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

JoEllen KillionOur guest bloggers have been blogging like gangbusters!

Unfortunately, that meant that I had to put the “Ask the Expert” sessions on hold for a bit, but they are back. Throughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

This week’s Q&A focuses on teachers actually implementing what coaches suggest.

Q. I have a teacher who seems open to my suggestions when we meet on-on one, but doesn’t actually implement any of them in the classroom based on my observations. Any ideas on how I can move her forward?

A. When it doesn’t appear that teachers implement what coaches suggest, I wonder about several things. One is whether teachers know how to do what coaches want them to do.  Another is whether they have the resources necessary to do it. A third is whether the teacher understands that coach expects him/her to do something. Another is whether they have the will. There are other reasons too.

So, the first strategy to use is to ask them to develop an action plan or helping them develop one so there is clarity about what to do. If at all possible, get specifics about when they will implement the strategy. Some teachers need those plans to be very specific and others don’t. The second is to ask about what they will use to do what is being suggested and how they will access those resources. Then, it is helpful to clarify that the coach is interested in knowing how it goes and that the coach will follow-up. Sometimes teachers don’t think that the coach holds any expectation for them to use the ideas suggested. Clarifying that can be as simple as, “I will be eager to know how it goes. I’ll check back with you on Wednesday.” Next is assessing willingness by listening for language that might suggest intent to act. It is also helpful to ask, “When will you do this?” “Who will be involved?” “When can I check back with you to learn about how it went?” “May I watch?”

Intentional follow-up is important and it can be brief. Plan to stop by and just ask, “How did it go?” “What’s next now?”

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” Session #5 with JoEllen Killion

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

Over the next few weeks, we will post these questions and answers to this blog. Our hope is to provide some answers to the same questions you may have asked yourself, and to spur new conversations around the roles of coaches and mentors and the professional conversations that take place with teacher leaders, and the teachers they support.

This week’s Q&A focuses on teacher respect for colleagues who now coach.

Q. I’m trying to get the teacher that I coach to understand that I’m there to support her professional development, not to help teach her class or grade papers. How can I explain this in a diplomatic way without damaging our great relationship?

A. This is a challenging situation and how a coach responds can potentially affect the coach’s relationship with the teacher as noted. Responses to questions 3 and 4 will be helpful to review too.

I might say, “Teaching is a multi-dimensional responsibility and learning to manage the various dimensions can be challenging. I know that you continuously strive to improve and that you want to be the best you can be. I can help you do that best in a three-step process that includes:

  1. I model for you in your classroom with your students
  2. You and I do it together with each of us taking equal responsibility for the work
  3. You model for me so that I can offer feedback.

This process builds your strengths as a teacher. Each part of the process will begin with us planning together what students will learn and how to teach that as well as time to debrief what occurred so we can refine the lesson and learn from our experience.”

I would clarify my role as a coach, share the goals of the coaching program, revisit the school’s improvement goals, and the scope of my work. I might offer alternatives that would meet the teacher’s needs that fit into the scope of my work so the teacher gained clarity about the parameters of my work—what I will and won’t do. I would stay positive, supportive, and encouraging and continue to offer acceptable alternatives. Try, “I can’t do that, however what I can do to help you accomplish that end is . .  .” For example, “I can’t grade the pre-test for you, however once you have the grades, I can help you think about how to differentiate instruction.”

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” Session #4 with JoEllen Killion

Monday, October 19th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

Over the next few weeks, we will post these questions and answers to this blog. Our hope is to provide some answers to the same questions you may have asked yourself, and to spur new conversations around the roles of coaches and mentors and the professional conversations that take place with teacher leaders, and the teachers they support.

This week’s Q&A focuses on teacher respect for colleagues who now coach.

Q. I have just moved from classroom teacher to math coach within my building, I feel like this may be difficult for some of my co-workers to respect this new role.  Do you have any ideas about how I can quickly gain trust and confidence with my co-workers?

A. My response to the question above covers most of what I would say, with one exception. I encourage principals with coaches who are new to their role, and especially if they have been in another role in the school, to introduce the coach to the staff as the coach. It is very important for the principal to identify the scope of work of the coach, how the coach will work with teachers, what agreements the principal and coach have formed about their work together, and the specifics of the coach’s work, stressing what the coach will do and what the coach won’t do.

As a new coach who has taught in the school where I am now a coach, I would meet with teachers in teams within the first few days of school and talk about my work and the services that I provide. I would meet individually with as many teachers as possible too, however that can be challenging if the staff is large.

Another strategy is to ask for feedback and support from teachers about your work as a coach. Say something like this, “Since I am new in my position, I look forward to your feedback and support. Please share with me ideas you have for how I can become a better coach so that we can work together to accomplish the school’s goals.” Coaching is a two-way process. If the coach models being a learner, teachers might be more comfortable being learners too.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” Session #3 with JoEllen Killion

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

Over the next few weeks, we will post these questions and answers to this blog. Our hope is to provide some answers to the same questions you may have asked yourself, and to spur new conversations around the roles of coaches and mentors and the professional conversations that take place with teacher leaders, and the teachers they support.

This week’s Q&A focuses on first year coaches.

Q. You have years of experience and formative research working with coaches; what are a few pearls of wisdom that you can share with me as a first year coach?

A. What I share might be a surprise. I find the challenges for coaches rarely reside in the work of the coaches, and almost always sit within the infrastructure of the coaching program. I recommend that new coaches understand the scope of their work, their job description, and the expected results of their work. I encourage coaches to develop a work plan with their immediate supervisors (and principals if the principal is not the immediate supervisor) that delineates what they will do each day in 30-minute slots of time.

The first few weeks of the school year, I recommend, are devoted to meeting individually with teachers and with teams of teachers, reviewing their individual classroom goals for student learning, explaining the range of services you provide and that align with the school’s and coaching program’s goals, and generating some ideas of possible ways to help the teacher, again that align with the school’s program’s, and teacher’s student learning goals.

I would urge new coaches to avoid doing anything they are asked to do and to think very carefully about whether what they do is what they want to be doing for the rest of the school year. It is very easy to fall into a trap of gathering resources and not focusing on student learning. It is sometimes helpful to share information with teachers asking them to share what they are working on as a part of their professional learning goals, what their goals for student learning are, what the coaching program goals are, how you can help them, and how they can contact you. Some coaches ask teachers to complete a brief information sheet or request for services sheet that identifies what the teacher wants from the coach.

Another important part of the early stage of a coach’s work with teachers is building a professional relationship that clarifies that the coach too has a set of goals and processes for working. 

Coaches at all times should be visible, productive, helpful, and focused on their primary goal of improving student learning. 

  • Share/Bookmark

“Ask the Expert” session #2 with JoEllen Killion

Monday, October 5th, 2009

JoEllen KillionThroughout the summer of 2009, we asked users of PBS TeacherLine Peer Connection (our tool designed to assist instructional coaches and mentors search, save, and share high-quality PD resources), to submit questions to an expert in the field of professional development. Our expert for this session was none other than JoEllen Killion, deputy executive director of the National Staff Development Council.

Over the next few weeks, we will post these questions and answers to this blog. Our hope is to provide some answers to the same questions you may have asked yourself, and to spur new conversations around the roles of coaches and mentors and the professional conversations that take place with teacher leaders, and the teachers they support.

This week’s Q&A focuses on the future of coaching and mentoring programs.

Q. The role of instructional coaches and teacher mentors has grown in schools and districts over the past few years based on research that shows teacher leaders improve the effectiveness of the teachers they support. Where do you see coaching and mentoring programs going in the next 5-10 years? And how do you see technology playing a part in teacher leaders’ skills and knowledge growth?

A. Coaching and mentoring are likely to increase in schools if the budget situation works out. However, even if it doesn’t, I anticipate the new federal efforts to differentiate teachers’ work and to develop teacher leadership opportunities as a means of keeping teachers in schools will mean there are more opportunities for coaching and mentoring. My ideal vision is that there are multiple coaches and mentors working in schools to support teams of teachers.

Technology will be essential for tracking communications, interactions, services, resources, etc. Several learning management programs have components that support coaches and mentors. Peer Connection is the only comprehensive program that provides a full range of the services to support mentors, coaches, and the teachers they serve. Others will surely pop up and may even be under development.

I am intrigued by long-distance, real-time coaching that occurs via multiple camera systems as another way technology supports coaching and mentoring. Other countries are using systems like this far more than we are. In China, for example, a master teacher watches a teacher hundreds of miles away and communicates in real time with the teacher via an ear bud and two-way video to offer on-the-spot coaching.

The most important thing to remember about technology is that it is a tool for, and not a replacement for, coaching and mentoring. The technology is not the coach or mentor, yet technology can increase the efficiency of coaching and mentoring and bring them to places face-to-face support is not accessible.

  • Share/Bookmark